Celeron D is still a flash dragon Celeron D and Shining Dragon are good

Is Celeron D or Shining Dragon at the same frequency powerful?

I can't stand you, but the people above make me even more unbearable

If you think about it, the low-frequency flashing dragon is the same grade as the Celeron D, so will the high-frequency flashing dragon be worse than the Celeron D with the same frequency as yourself???

If you want to play the game, the flash dragon is better.

Each has its own advantages, each has its own disadvantages, the so-called fish and bear's paw can't have both, alas, it's easy to do it if you have money, buy a Celeron D, and then buy a flash dragon won't solve it!

It's up to you to do it, if you play games, use Shining Dragon, if you use Celeron for office.

August 30, 2005 News:

NVIDIA is ready to release their latest AMD integrated chipset chipset on September 20 with MCP51 Southbridge chip, after NVIDIA said that the C51G chipset will integrate NV44 GeForce 6200 graphics cores in the northbridge chip, but now Nvidia has decided to integrate GeForce 6150 graphics cores in C51G, and it is not clear about Geforce Whether the 6150 performs similarly or below GeForce

6200 graphics core. At present, the basic technical parameters of the C51G chipset are as follows:

Supports AMD ATHLON 64 FX ATHLON 64 X2 ATHLON 64 SEPRON

Integrated GeForce 6150 graphics core.

Supports 2000 1600 mt s hyper-transport

4 x DIMM slots, supporting DDR400 333 266

1 x PCIe x16, 1 x PCIe x4, 3 x PCI slots.

Dual Gigabit Ethernet.

Intel's CPUs are mainly used for multi-** applications, while AMD's 3D capabilities are stronger, at least now most of AMD's CPUs have 3D NOW technology.

No, what NV was going to do for Intel fell through for some reason, because Intel gave the order for low-end motherboard chips to Ati.

Personally, I think Celeron D is good, and the 347 model and above are incomparable to the Sparkling Dragon.

Green vegetables and radishes have their own love.

Totally personal preference.

To play the game, use the Shining Dragon.

AMD is much faster, it won't be close, it's far behind, in fact, the CD is very slow. If you want to buy it, it's still AMD, it has less calorific value, and it's fast.

It is purely a personal preference for the public to eat wontons and the woman to eat noodles. I just like CD and should be for me not to play games.

What's popular now is Sailong.

AMD has been nominal for a long time, using nominal values to nominate CPU performance. On what is PR nominal value for example:

The Athlon3000+ stands for a CPU with comparable performance to Pentium 4.

But it's not that fast ( Athlon64 3000+ E6 only.

This 3000+ performance may be stronger than the P4 in some ways, but it may not be as good as the P4 in some ways. Because it takes the median value, it is named 3000+.

The same is true for the CPU you are referring to above, after all, Intel and AMD have different design routes.

So if you want to compare, use the Sepron 2600+ and the Celeron D clock speed to compare around.

2600 means equivalent to the performance of the main frequency of the Pentium Four, AMD has his technology, but the main frequency used to be spelled, so a set of conversion schemes was designed, and I don't know the specifics.

Celeron D performance is not good, I have installed both of these for others.

AMD's processors have never relied on frequency to win, they rely on more sophisticated algorithms and better designs that make it achieve better performance at lower frequencies.

Recommend the landlord to buy sempron!

It is better to go with a board from nforce.

What I said upstairs makes sense, but in fact, the second-level cache of the two is different.

Semblem +6100 has stronger gameplay.

Saiyang +910GL compatibility is relatively good.

In general, you should still choose the Sempron platform.

6100 I hate integrated graphics the most.

The AMD system is better, and the cost performance is relatively high.

Both are outdated CPUs,Only Mu Yu can be on the Internet,Office performance,The two are relatively judged to be CD 356 is better,Generally according to the former K8 structure of the Semptosaurus3000 corresponds to the performance of Celeron,Besides, the performance of CD356 is better than the performance of the 90nm process of Celeron,The original secondary cache is 256KB,CD356 is the secondary cache of the 65nm process is 512KB performance will be better,The relative heat is lower than the original 90nm process。 So the two are relatively better than CD356. CD356 is recommended, if the heat dissipation is better, it is better to overclock it.

The comprehensive performance of Celeron D331 and Sembransaur 2600+ is almost the same, but the stability of Celeron is a little better, and the speed of Sembleon is slightly better, which is suitable for gaming!

Celeron D336VS Sparkling Dragon 2800+ Ditto!

It depends on what you're used for, and of course you use a sparkling dragon to play the game. Use Celeron for pictures and movies.

Strong 64-bit processing power is built on the support of 64-bit system and software, currently supporting 64-bit operating systems in addition to Linux, only Windows XP 2003 x64 version, and the driver must also be 64-bit to be installed on this type of operating system And this alone is not enough, the software used must also be 64-bit compilation Although Microsoft claims that compiling from a 32-bit program to 64-bit is very fast, However, the existing 64-bit programs are extremely rare. In other words, as long as the operating system, drivers, and software do not conform to 64-bit, your 64-bit CPU will only work in 32-bit compatibility mode. So at the moment, 64-bit is not very useful for home computers.

Of course, when it comes to CPUs like the Athlon64, which are already very powerful in their own right, it doesn't matter if it's 64-bit or not. ps.Although WindowsX64 runs 32-bit programs in a compatible way, some programs are still not perfectly compatible, such as input methods.

Not necessarily!

AMD's Sempron is divided into 32-bit and 64-bit, to tell whether AMD's processor is 64-bit, you can see if it supports x86-64 extended 64-bit x86 instruction set.

It is said on the Internet that AMD's gaming performance is stronger than Intel's, and it is true after many tests. In general, AMD's processors have lower frequencies than Intel's, but their performance is not reduced. The AMD Athlon64 3200+ is no slouch in the face of the powerful Intel Pentium4 630.

So buy according to your own situation.

Now 64-bit doesn't do anything.

The game is definitely better than the Shining Dragon.

A 64-bit CPU is no different from a 32-bit CPU if it does not use a 64-bit operating system.

AMD is good, but now Saiyang is very cheap, and the boxed Saiyang 346 is only 450 yuan. At present, Intel's model-to-price ratio is significantly higher than AMD's.

The AMD Sempron 2800+ has better gaming performance than the P4506! Playing games must be a flash dragon 2800.

Each has its own merits, the daily operation of office procedures is slightly better, and the game AMD is better.

It's definitely AMD Sempron 2800+ from the point of view of ** and performance ratio, AMD Sempron 2800+ is superior.

tom'S's evaluation, Sempron's game performance can exceed P4 in many cases, and Celeron is not even qualified to participate in the evaluation, and many large foreign CPU evaluations only have Sepron and no Celeron.

Play the game at the time.

Not a level.

Racing sheep DD is too far off.

But I still like AMD, and I always think that AMD's is better than Ceyand, maybe because they have their own strengths.

Actually, it's pretty much the same.

Now Seyan D has raised L2 to 256K, which is very good.