-
Don't just look at frequency. Actual performance speaks for itself. 3000 is definitely stronger.
Needless to say, after the overshooting, it must be 3000 strong, don't question it at all. On the advantage of cost performance 3000, the hot sales since its birth are proof, although it has been discontinued, but it is definitely a classic product in recent years. It is recommended to buy 3000.
I bought it on April 1st, 760 yuan, in bulk, plus TT Silent K8 939 cooling fan 160 yuan.
-
AMD is more suitable for gaming, the stability is slightly worse (the reason is that the motherboard heart support is not good), the frequency comparison you give the two, the display is AMD low, the actual performance is slightly higher.
-
It has always been recognized that inter is relatively stable, but AMD is more stable after overclocking, the most important thing is that it is very cost-effective, and the speed depends on all aspects, don't just look at the frequency. I feel that the AMD3000+ is very cost-effective right now.
-
I'm very responsible to tell you, if you buy 3000 now, you won't be wrong.
-
It's stable without overclocking.
AMD is more stable than Inter when overclocked.
Of course, overclocking must be done with a CPU fan with high cooling efficiency.
-
If you want AMD's 3000+, although its main frequency is not high, its performance is definitely good. Much higher than the CPU performance.
-
It depends on what you're going to do, if you're mainly playing games, 3000+ is recommended, but if you're going to run large rendering software, it's still fine
-
High inter frequency and low performance, low AMD frequency and high performance.
-
It's all eliminated, and playing games is definitely not good, so you can only choose Pentium.
-
As a simple example, the LGA775's P4 is definitely better than the Stock939's AMD Athlon™ 3000+.
In terms of high-end processors, Intel spikes AMD!!
-
I don't know which model of Intel Pentium you're talking about? If you compare it with Lao Ben 3 Ben 2 or something, it will definitely not work, but in terms of neutralization performance, Intel is better than AMD, especially the core core processor.
-
In terms of performance, the Pentium D is better than AMD's.
In fact, it still depends on your use, if you just want to play games on the Internet, then you can use AMD, AMD's is cheaper than Pentium.
If you have a video, design or run some big software, then I recommend you to buy Pentium D.
-
AMD Athlon3000+ is relative to Intel 630, now in the low-end I think AMD's cost performance is relatively good, but at the high-end, I recommend Intel's Coro2 Duo, a very good CPU.
Before CORO came out, I never recommended others to choose Intel's CPU, although Intel's CPU frequency is very high, but the power consumption is high, the heat generation is large, the execution efficiency is low, and the overall performance is similar to the AMD CPU with a much lower frequency, or even low, and the price is higher than the same grade of AMDCPU.
But after Coro came out, Intel took a big dive, and the CPU price dropped a lot, but in terms of comprehensive performance. All I can say is the current PD and Athlon, depending on what you like!!
To point out another mistake to you, the Core 2 3600 should be the Core 2 (Coro2) 6300, not the 3600, the CPU you listed, the best performance is it! , but the price is about 1400 expensive.
The performance of the Athlon's 64 x2 3800+ is slightly inferior to the Coro2, not to mention the Pentium D, which is a replacement for the Pentium D in its own right, and it can be said that the Pentium D is a complete Intel failure.
-
AMD is significantly better than Pentium for gaming, but Intel has a big advantage when it comes to handling data!
-
Which model is better between the Cool 3600 and the Pentium D?
-
Not a brand.
Why is it equivalent to Benji?
The CPU depends on the main frequency, front-side bus and other parameters, which is meaningless.
The AMD3000 is already pretty good.
-
The frequency is about 2400, but the processing effect is better than all.
-
AMD has always had a CPU of the same frequency much faster than Intel's, just as everyone used to like to use AMD's CPU for overclocking. The AMD3000+ should be equivalent to the Intel Ben 5.
-
AMD and Pentium are suitable for different groups of people.
If you are a gamer, AMD3000+ is better than Pentium 4, if you use it for office, then Pentium 4 is much better than AMD3000+** features, AMD is also good, and the price is cheap.
-
This simple AMD is a company name Pentium is the name of Intel's product family.
-
PR value, which is equivalent to 3GHzIt's all almost symmetrical.
Although the frequency is low, AMD is highly efficient.
-
Good point of AMD. Your 3000+ is better than Ben 4's.
-
It's equivalent to running three, I wish you a happy Internet
-
3G, AMD's PR nominal is for Intel's main frequency.
-
AMD's processor is not the higher the model, the better, on the whole, the 3000 is relatively cost-effective. It should be very high. AMD games don't say much here.,Actually, AMD's drawings are also good.,A friend of mine uses this drawing.,He mainly makes renderings.,He used a month's time.,It's no worse than Intel's.。
Now the computer is enough, and what we need to consider under the premise of enough is the cost performance.
-
It is recommended to use AMD3000+ for 6000 yuan, and 3200+ can also be matched with AMD3000+
Motherboard NF4Ultra
Memory kingston512*2
HDD Seagate 160G SATA2
GraphicsShadow Gallop Heavy Gunner 6600
Display Optional.
The chassis is optional. Mouse and keyboard are optional.
-
At present, it seems that these two U are bad, and you have to pick a good AMD3000, after all, it was once brilliant.
-
Pentium has slowly withdrawn from the market, and it is recommended that you use AMD.
-
Generally speaking, AMD's heat production is high, Pentium is a series of Intel, Intel's motherboard is more expensive than AMD's, of course, it is only the same ** relative. Intel's current Core i3 i5 i7 is good, AMD's current Phenom II 4-core 6-core and Athlon-series.
-
AMD is cost-effective, Intel's CPU ** is not kind, low-end AMD completes Intel, and high-end is reversed Intel completes AMD
-
Now Intel is good. AMD has completely lagged behind Intel in terms of productivity and overclocking performance. However, AMD is cheap, if you have a small budget, buy AMD, and if you want high performance, buy Intel!
What is Pentium?,It's all Core now.。。
-
It mainly depends on the running speed of the CPU, and the performance is good if the speed is high. Nowadays, mainstream CPUs can generally reach speeds of around 3GHz.
-
Don't ask such a novice question, this kind of question has been asked hundreds of times on the Internet, you need to know what is the use of being so detailed.
None of them are better.
Look at what you're using it for, and then choose which one is right for you.
-
It's better to buy 5000+ now! The CPU within 1000 yuan is not his opponent, as long as it is about 400.
Choose Pentium, the comprehensive performance is much stronger, AMD is very cool to play games, but Pentium is not inferior to it, you can't tell the difference between 60 Zhen and 80 Zhen at all. It's wise to choose Intel now, and it's easy to upgrade.
Generally speaking, the main difference between Pentium and Celeron is that their second-level cache is not the same, the second-level cache of the Pentium CPU, the CPU of the game Yang is twice as large, and then the CPU of Cyd has the second-level cache of cy, and the CPU of Pentium is at least 256M of the second-level cache, and now the CPU of Pentium D is a single 1M cache, and the double has reached 2M, and the CPU of AMD is the best for game enthusiasts, and the CPU of Pentium is the best choice for friends who are mapping There are too many specific differences between them to be said.
Personally, I recommend using the e2180
While the conventional wisdom is that AMD's CPUs are better than Inter's, that's because it was a few years ago, but that's no longer the case. >>>More
a) Stable, fixed bugs.
b) and not much different, just fixed some bugs. >>>More
Of course, it is the strength of the computer, which can be upgraded to a high performance, many mobile phones are fixed capacity, and they cannot be upgraded, and the computer is much better.