The difference between Canon600D and 7D, I don t know if it matches the 24 105 lens?

The 600D is Canon's entry-level SLR, with a plastic body and a relatively small body size and a body weight of 515g

The handle is relatively small, the five-sided mirror viewfinder is small and dim, and the other 9 focus points, only one cross focus point in the middle, no AF fine-tuning.

Metering is 63-zone metering, the upper shutter speed is 1 4000 seconds, the life is 50,000 times, and the continuous shooting speed is relatively slow, and the speed is relatively slow, and the speed is 1 second per second.

In addition, the skin area is relatively small, and the control is relatively weak due to the single wave wheel.

The 7D is Canon's APS-C flagship SLR, with a metal anti-splash body, a relatively large body, and a body weight of 820g

The handle is large, the pentaprism viewfinder is wide and bright, with 19 full cross focus points and AF fine adjustments.

Metering is 63-zone double-layer metering, with a shutter limit of 1 8000 seconds, a life of 150,000 times, a shorter time lag, and fast continuous shooting, 8 frames per second.

The skin area is large, the double wave wheel, and the control is relatively strong.

In short, this model has a poor positioning, and there is a 60d in the middle of them

It's fine with 24-105, it's just that the wide-angle end is equivalent, and the angle of view is too small.

Both of these are frame cutting machines, the 600D is relatively new, with some new technology, but the 7D can be said to be a quasi-professional flagship. Handling, focusing, etc. will be better. Just look at it. But if you go to 7D, it's really better to add some money to 5D2.

Also, if you want to match 24-105, the equivalent focal length of 38-168 lacks a wide angle. It is estimated that it will be more inconvenient to use. It is recommended to use 17-40 F4L, which is also more cost-effective.

I've also wanted to get a kit lately. I know that 7d is definitely better than 60d; As for the lens 18-135, it is enough for the purpose you mentioned, which is good. If it's equivalent, it's definitely the latter.

I checked it, and the set of 7D+18-135 is very suitable;

With such funds you can consider a 7D full-frame camera. A good shot can be considered slowly!

Hey, I really don't know how such a high level came about, 7D is said to be in full frame. If you're not a sports journalist, don't blindly use a high ISO, there is no difference between 7D and 60D. Lens 24-105 is Canon's red circle small ternary, the aperture is constant f4, and the conversion coefficient is enough, but if it is not enough, I will take 2 steps back.

18-135 are dog-headed and are not comparable. 60d with 24-105 recommended. I used 40d with 24-105 before upgrading the device

Why not buy a Nikon D90 with a 24-85mm F AF ZOOM-NIKKOR, 10000 IS ENOUGH, AND OVERALL IT SHOULD NOT BE INFERIOR TO THE CANON 60D.

12,000 dollars in a Nikon 24-120mm F 4G ED VR standard lens.

What do you want to shoot? In my opinion, neither of these is good

I have both, I like both of them, and they are indispensable.

Usually I use it for indoor space shooting, and it's the cheapest ultra-wide angle in the whole set. 24105 is a relatively mediocre set head, there are no shortcomings, there are no obvious shortcomings, many people say that the set head is not good, in fact, on the contrary, Canon's original matching head is very practical.

Inner focus,Basically no dust,The disadvantage is that there is no stabilization,Although it is said that such a focal length,But there is an anti-shake IS function1740 is perfect in my eyes。

Outer zoom, longer and heavier than 17. The wide-angle barrel changes, and the telephoto pillow changes. With 3 levels of stabilization at the beginning of IS, the stabilization is turned on with noise, and it is a cost-effective regular focal length red circle head.

As an ultra-wide-angle, plus a decade-old lens, the image quality is less than 24 sharpness, and the color is better than 24.

4.If you are more interested in multi-purpose shooting, it is better to match a 24 first to see if it is enough, and then match it with a 1740 or 70200 according to your needs.

Totally consider 24 105! 17 40 is far less practical than 24105 The wide angle of 24 is enough for the average person, the ultra-wide angle is not easy to control, and the limitations are large, 24 105 is very good for tourism, and the wide angle of 24 is generally enough.

For the average amateur, the 24-105 focal length is commonly used, which is much more common than the 17-40.

If you are on a tight budget, you can use one of the commonly used ones first, and add the others later.

Personal recommendation 24-105.

The main consideration is an economic issue. In fact, both lenses are more practical, but if you buy the 17-40 first, and use it for a while, you will find that the telephoto end of the 40 does not meet the needs at all. Even if you shoot landscapes, once you want to shoot a sunset or macro flowers and plants, 40 is not enough at all (sometimes 105 is not enough!).

So even if you buy a 17-40 first, you have to buy a 24-105 sooner or later, so that you are buying two single lenses. If you buy 24-105 first, it is a set, which can save thousands of dollars.

D600 Focus is complete6D, don't pay too much attention to the wifi GPS function, too entertaining, Nikon is real.

The lens is recommended to take into account both 24-70 landscape portraits.

Both of them are red circle dog heads, add money to 24-70, there is a qualitative improvement, or buy two general fixed focus.

Don't bother. Very simple. 24-70 works better in this range than 24-70 in 24-105. In addition, compare the aperture, are they all 4. The wide angle also looks at the aperture.

**Factors have to be considered, I believe that the higher the price, the better the lens.

First, in terms of the body, both D300S and 7D are APS-C format, and 5D2 is 24x36mm full-frame, as you said, the imaging quality is better than the former.

Second, in terms of lenses, Canon's 24-70 and 24-105 F4 are both L-heads, and the image quality is needless to say, but the 24-70 aperture standard zoom head is better than the 24-105 large zoom Tianya head in any aspect, as for the Nikon AF-S DX 17-55, I dare not comment on it.

Summary: If you arbitrarily match the three fuselages and lenses, the best is 5D2 plus 24-70, if you limit the above three collocations, 7D plus 24-70 The imaging effect is slightly better, because the main thing that determines the quality of the imaging effect is the lens, I hope it will help you.

The key is which door to enter and what system to enter.

C also has 17-55, although the grade and N are not the same level, but it is not too watery, I personally prefer D300S+1755

But you probably can't help but buy it in the future At this time, there is a difference in the door of entry There are many types of lenses in C, and the quality of N is generally better than that of C, but it is also more expensive.

Regarding the fuselage, the full set must be APSC, which cannot be compared, but many times the gap is not so big, but the lens ** is much more expensive.

By the way, 7d+24-70 is purely an egg pain, and the focal length is too difficult to use, or you will be ruthless to buy a 5d2+24-70

Upstairs is quite right, add.

17-55 is a half-width bull's head, the picture quality is not said, do not upgrade the full frame, D300S+17-55 is the half-width top configuration of the mud pit;

The best match is still 5d2+24-70, if the budget does not allow, it is better to still 7d+24-70, and it is not too late to study the full width when the price of 5d3 is reduced, and 24-70 is not outdated for ten years, but 5d2 has long been frozen at that time.

There are still advantages to recommending a 5D full-frame body.

15-85 is a good choice if **reasonable, but unfortunately its price is too high and not worth it!

And the half-frame high-end lens has poor relative value retention. It will also be more difficult to upgrade in the future.

24-105 people think it's great value. (on a half-frame machine).

Maybe a lot of people should question this. No more wide angles!

105 This cranial edge is of poor quality, but the center sharpness is good. The F4 is also perfectly fine, and the center part is exactly preserved on a half-width machine, both at the edges and in the center.

What if you don't have a wide angle?! Consider taking a Sigma 10-20. With these two lenses in hand and a large-aperture lens, basically all subjects are all-encompassing. (Except for bird hunters).

If you follow common sense: 10-20, 17-55, 70-200

Then according to the configuration of 105, if there is no telephoto demand, the basic two lenses are OK. Maybe you will know when you use it, 24 is not enough in half a frame only in rare or special cases. Of course, it also has something to do with personal shooting habits.

So at least save a telephoto head, and maybe don't use the ultra-wide angle. Add a large aperture to fix the focus, why not.

The biggest problem of 24-105 is that there is no wide angle, if there is no such concern, of course, it is to be red, the quality is completely different, and the second-hand market is also good.

You can use an 18-55 to make up a wide angle.

That's it.

15-85 is more suitable, 24-105 is the full width of 15-85, 15-85 although it is not a red circle, but the image quality and lens quality, sharpness is not lost to the red circle, mainly because 15-85 is only suitable for apsc format, and the aperture level is reduced (landscape photos themselves do not use a large aperture), cancel the dustproof and waterproof function (for people who usually love lenses, it is true that the dustproof and waterproof function is not used), so the positioning is not a red circle, and the simplified part is exactly what is not usually used, Therefore, the head of 15-85 is more suitable for 7D, 24-105 is only better than 15-85 in portrait photography when used in 7D, and most of the portraits use such a fixed focus effect, so the combination of 15-85 is better than 24-105, the price is not too much, and the wide-angle portraits are complete.

First 6D + Sigma 24-70 + lights, enough to pat the wedding to make money, and then have money to slowly toss others.

1. Full-width preferential, regardless of whether it actually makes sense, but many people look forward to entering the full frame after entering the APSC, and have never seen anyone looking forward to entering the APSC after entering the full frame.

2, don't care how much 5D2 has more advantages than 6D in some aspects, the fuselage, absolutely buy new and not old (not referring to the meaning of second-hand), and it feels like 6D is better than 5D2 is more important than 5D2 is better than 6D.

3. The budget is really limited, so don't think too much about the lens, with the purpose of having enough, in fact, if you don't mind the deputy factory, I would recommend you to buy a second-hand Sigma 24-70 first, anyway, 24-105 is not good.

4, it makes a lot of sense to add an external flash, it is recommended to buy a new one, and the budget is only enough for 430, but it is enough.

It is advisable to save some more money and put it into a full pair. For example, 6d, d600, of course, 5d2 is fine. It's better to buy 7D than D7000, 1W5 can be equipped with a better lens.

For example, 16-85 (second-hand) one, 85 second-hand) one, 35 one, almost with a flash. It's enough for you until you don't want to. But after all, it's an APS-C machine.

7D is also an APS-C machine.

See the use... If it's just the daily class of the spectroscopic class, the 7D or D7100 that I haven't thought about investing too much is enough, and if I want to study this aspect deeply, it's still 6D

10,000, the budget is not up or down, and it is uncomfortable.

It feels better to be heavy and light, and the whole frame is definitely no play, unless it is second-hand.

As for the lens, the landlord must have a lot of choices, so I won't repeat it.

The 1W5 Invincible Rabbit Setup contains 24-105 F4 L lenses, which can be 5D2 plus EF24-70

This standard zoom lens has a wide aperture, which is larger than the 24-105 f4 L aperture of the suite.

When shooting people, you can shoot beautiful background blur.

It would also be nice to take pictures of items that are not very small.

It is recommended to wait for the Nikon D7100 to be released at the end of February, a very awesome machine.

60D, D7000 this is fine, the operability function is good. D600, D650 estimated operability and function difference, less dial or something, and others are fine.

It is not very recommended that 6d be put into 5d2 plus 17-40

6D is full-frame but does not support RAW, you will lose confidence in SLR when you buy the sixth brother. The seventh brother of the intercept frame is the top of APSC, equipped with a very powerful processor, the speed of eight consecutive shots per second, with 2470 is perfect, and it can also be used when upgrading to full frame 2470 in the future, and 24105 is a complete dog head.