Can war solve economic problems? Does war promote economic growth?

To be precise, changes in the economy as a whole cannot be shaken by a single war or a single country. However, there are also aspects of writing, such as World War II, the Iraq War, and now the Libyan War, which can indeed enhance the economic power of one's own country to a certain extent by plundering resources and controlling the sovereignty and territory of other countries.

Generally speaking, war slows down the pace of a country's economy and affects economic development. However, in the case of war masters, the result is the opposite. Referring specifically to the several wars fought by the United States in recent years, it has not only won militarily, but also gained economic benefits.

Before and after the Opium War, the Western powers also reaped the benefits of the war against China.

If you can make good use of war, you can solve economic problems, such as the United States.

The economy is the way to rule, war is the means, and politics is the end!

In fact, it is to transfer contradictions.

You can understand this ,,, if you look at the end of Germany and Japan in World War II.

Some articles refer to the United States' participation in World War II.

It has promoted the growth of GDP and accelerated the development of the economy. This is an important statement that war leads to economic growth. In fact, when we have an understanding of productivity, we will find that this logic is fundamentally wrong.

Under the state of World War II, the economic operation of the whole society is centered on the manufacturing of military weapons, so a large amount of steel will be invested in the manufacture of **, such as **, aircraft, and ammunition. These will use a lot of metal, which means that a lot of steel will be destroyed at a fairly high rate in a war. This is a huge waste of material resources for Bilu.

These metals could have been used in civilian industry, could be used to improve the lives of the public, could be used to produce automobiles, and could produce many civilian consumer goods, but due to the war, these metals were diverted to military use, and they were quickly destroyed in the war. This means that there will be a stagnation and repression of civilian industry. In the United States, during World War II, the nation's economy was regulated.

As steel is consumed by munitions, civilian industry is deprived of the necessary resources. At this time, ** stipulates, which industries can be developed and to what extent. If you want to replace the car, you can't do it, because there are not so many raw materials, so your civilian consumption power is suppressed.

Therefore, we can see that the GDP statistics of the United States during World War II were very high, and it was driven by arms, but steel was quickly consumed in the war. Although the GDP data is high in the spring, at the same time, there is a suppression and downturn in the civilian consumption industry, that is, everyone's consumption power is greatly suppressed. This is in the United States, and the conditions are not bad, because there is no direct participation in the war, but in Britain, France, Germany and other belligerent countries, there will be material control, rationing, as much as possible to reduce consumption, suppress consumption.

So in a state of war.

The economy is not prosperous, suppressed, and regulated, especially the consumer goods industry, which is greatly compressed. War itself cannot promote economic growth, because war consumes, and this consumption stems from the real savings of society as a whole. Since real savings are massively consumed, there are no resources to invest and no resources to consume, so the economy is bound to shrink and slump.

Although the GDP figure is high from the point of view of war statistics, it is bound to be a depression in the field of private consumption.

What would be the economic impact if there was a war between countries?

The author believes that in the event of a war between countries, what is fought is comprehensive national strength, and what is fought is money, if the battlefield is on which side, people, money, and materials will lose more, the main battlefields of the two world wars are in Europe, Asia, and Africa, and the losses in these places are very heavy, while the United States is far away from the battlefield, so the two world wars did not cause any damage to the United States, on the contrary, the United States also made a lot of war wealth through these two world wars, although it lost a little at Pearl Harbor, but from the end of the entire war, the United States is more to earn and lose less.

From a practical point of view, the world is not peaceful, such as Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen and other countries, are still in a state of war, the ordinary people of these countries suffer from the war, many people have become refugees and homeless, and even many civilians have lost their lives because of the war, it is because the war has too much harm to the ordinary people, so the mainstream of today's world is still peaceful development, after all, only peaceful development of ordinary people can get recuperation, can also live a peaceful life. Only those warmongers or lunatics would want to start a war.

You know, the war will not only cause a large number of civilians to suffer, but also will have a huge negative impact on the economies of the two countries, such as once the war starts, danger, insecurity, and instability will appear, and when that time comes, a lot of capital will choose to withdraw, withdraw funds, and then run away with money, for capital, this is understandable, after all, capital is always chasing interests, they are not willing to stay in turbulent areas at all. Once the capital is withdrawn on a large scale, it will cause the ** to collapse, a large number of companies will go bankrupt, and finally prices will skyrocket, so that the people who suffer from the disaster are still ordinary people.

911 is a clear example of this, where the World Trade Center was hit and the immediate result was economic turmoil. Many investors thought it was not safe at the time, and began to withdraw capital, a large amount of capital outflow, that time to the United States was a very big blow, a large number of companies out of the line capital chain broken, ** crash, economic depression, and the United States ** at that time was to do their best, only to gradually restore the economy, it can be seen that this is the shadow of war on the impact of capital, many companies, enterprises will choose to withdraw when they feel the danger, in such an environment, the economic regression is very rapid, You must know that 911 is not a real war yet, and if it happens, the economic blow to a country will be several times more serious.

This is why, people will say that war is economic strength, but the people of the world are looking forward to peace, hoping that there will never be a war, only peace can allow all the people in the world to recuperate, this is also the consensus of the people of the world, after all, the war brings people a lack of life, either death or injury, and even a home can not go back, and finally become a refugee, so it is better not to appear in the war.

First of all, the economies of these two countries will face a state of stagnation, secondly, other countries that have economic dealings with these two countries will also follow the market**, and finally, the world's market will fluctuate because of the economic problems of these two countries, which will cause a worldwide economic depression.

If there is a war between countries, the economy will be devastated. Because once a war breaks out, all resources will be used on the battlefield. Economic development will stagnate.

In times of war, the economy will definitely be on a downward trend, because a lot of military supplies are needed.

War and the economy are inseparable, and the two influence and restrain each other. The economic impact of war is significant, as it undermines a stable social order, destroys economic infrastructure, and severely undermines economic development. In times of war, the state needs to mobilize a large amount of resources, materials and funds for war support, which will cause great pressure and burden on the economy.

At the same time, the war will also bring about certain problems such as inflation and fiscal deficits, which will deepen the difficulties of economic development.

However, war can also promote economic development, because the need for war mobilization forces the country to mobilize social resources, which in turn promotes the development of various emergency technologies and key technologies, accelerates the application and promotion of new technologies, and at the same time increases the support for domestic industries and further promotes the development of industries. In times of war, due to the mobilization and upgrading of various production resources, many technologies have made breakthroughs, and this development has also provided practical technical support for the long-term development of the economy.

There is also a close synergy between the economy and the war. Under certain conditions, economic stability can provide the necessary and powerful support and guarantee for a country's military war. In some advanced economies, the goal of a special military operation can be achieved only by relying solely on abundant economic resources to avoid war and the profound impact on the economy.

It is conducive to stabilizing the economy, optimizing resource allocation, and improving the technical level. At the same time, it will also contribute to the creation of a stable social environment, promote various innovations and the development of new industries, and comprehensively improve the country's economic and defense capabilities.

In short, war and the economy are inextricably linked. In times of war, the interaction between the economy and war serves the long-term interests of the country and the people. Grasping the close relationship between the economy and war and balancing the pros and cons of the two is of great significance to achieving comprehensive economic, political, and social development.

Exports have shrunk severely. Foreigners don't dare to sign a contract with you, because appearance contracts are generally long-term;

Inflation rises first and then falls. Out of fear of war, manufacturers will cut the scale of production, and residents will have a panic buying mentality, which adds up to rapid prices**. But since it is a local war, this inflation will not be vicious.

** It will strongly control prices, and it is not excluded that strict purchase restrictions will be adopted in some places. At the same time, a large number of war bonds will be issued, which is to borrow residents' money to fight the war and further stabilize inflation.

House prices are likely to be polarized, with skyrocketing** coexisting. If there is a risk of war, the holiday will be ** - the devil knows that the house will not be there in two days; Housing prices have skyrocketed in economic and political centers such as Beijing and Shanghai – the safest place for a local war. But the real estate market is likely to be heavily regulated, and the above-mentioned surge** is carried out in secret.

The industrial sector, especially the military sector, is running at full speed, while the tertiary industry and light industry are shrinking.

War is closely related to the economy. War is the continuation of politics, but also a means to solve political problems through violence, and the strength of the economy determines a country's strength and international political status, so the economy has a direct and objective impact on the victory or defeat of the war, there is a strong enough economy to back up to win a war is basically not a problem, if there is no strong enough economy to back up the war is basically more auspicious, however, although war is a violent act, While destroying the economy and destroying the economy, it is unconsciously pulling the economy forward, and in the process of its development, the economy is engaged in endless wars that are visible and invisible around various interests.

Economic warfare. Economic warfare has a long history, and ancient wars interrupt the enemy's grain and other combat materials, which is a way of economic warfare. In modern and modern warfare, economic warfare has received more attention.

In World War II, the struggle between Britain, the United States, Germany, Italy, and other countries to maintain and destroy the width difference between the Atlantic lines of communication, as well as the attacks on each other's industrial production bases, had a great impact on the course of the war.

Economic war! It's definitely about the economy.