Is it beneficial for the backward countries to resist the aggression of the advanced countries

From a rational point of view, it is not beneficial, and it is an action that hinders the progress and development of human civilization. But in terms of moral sentiments, it is beneficial, for example, the Inca Empire resisted the invasion of the Spaniards, which was a way to protect its civilization, its culture, its race, but if it failed, it would destroy the country, and it was also sad that the Indians were no longer visible in South America.

For example, if aliens invade Earth, and they are many, much more advanced than us, will our resistance be beneficial? I'm sure 90% of the people on earth would say it's beneficial.

This statement is false.

China adheres to the path of peaceful development, firmly pursues an independent foreign policy of peace, respects the right of the people of all countries to independently choose their own development path, upholds international fairness and justice, and opposes imposing its will on others, interfering in the internal affairs of other countries, and bullying the weak with the strong. China will never develop itself at the expense of the interests of other countries, nor will it give up its legitimate rights and interests, and no one should fantasize about or create differences and contradictions between China and other countries. China adheres to the basic national policy of opening up to the outside world, pursues a mutually beneficial and win-win strategy of opening-up, promotes high-quality Belt and Road cooperation, advances the Global Development Initiative, and promotes the building of a global development community.

Support the multilateral system, promote the construction of an open world economy, and promote economic globalization in a more open, inclusive, inclusive, balanced and win-win direction.

Therefore, backward countries should not invade and resist advanced countries, but should seek ways of peaceful development and improve their own development level and competitiveness, so as to better cope with global challenges and development opportunities.

Definitely, the inevitability of history, when the advanced countries are rich, there will be no wars, and the poor countries will slowly grab the resources because they need them, and finally there will be wars!

It is now a globalized world, governed mainly by the United Nations, and moving towards a situation in which one superpower and many powers are many, peace and development are the main themes of the times, and the chances of a third world war are slim.

Don't wait for the future, not now. Now it is the advanced countries that bully the backward countries, such as the United States fighting North Korea, Vietnam, Iraq.

Safeguard national dignity and maintain cultural diversity.

It is necessary to improve the ability of independent innovation and rely on the development of science and technology to promote the development of productive forces, so that the national economy will have a low degree of dependence on foreign technology.

Mobilize the power of the masses of the people to reform and make the country rich and strong, and enhance its international status.

Imperialist theories of aggression, subjugation, control and exploitation of others, the old imperialist gunboats and financial or commodity means, that is, military or economic means to achieve their own goals.

Socialism is the highest concentration of power in the main regime of public ownership, so you can unite the country.

Most of the developed countries are internal and war countries, the exploitation and control of the landlords and capitalists of the capitalist countries of the countries of the means of production, and the control and exploitation of the old empires of the means of production.

Overthrow the current regime and build a stronger state than imperialist and economically developed countries.

The only way to do this is to become a system that is freer and better than that of the West.

In addition, in the second sentence, even the outbreak of the Opium War only reduced China to a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, not a colony.

It is agreed that the Qing Dynasty's policy of closing the country to the outside world was to resist the colonial aggression of Western countries and make China a colony of Western countries, but also because of the isolation of the country, China could not learn the advanced culture of the West and did not have enough strength to resist the invaders.

The policy of closing oneself to the outside world has a certain effect on resisting foreign aggression, but the harm brought by the policy of closing oneself far outweighs the benefits. Closing the country to the outside world is that China is isolated from the world, and cannot have advanced information in a timely manner, improve the system, military affairs, etc., so that it cannot defeat the foreign powers later, but it is only to make China a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, rather than a complete colony.

First of all, the reason why the retreat policy was implemented was because the Japanese pirates at that time often harassed the coastal residents, which affected the normal life of the coastal residents, and in the initial stage, the retreat policy effectively maintained the security of the coastal areas, but also blocked China's exchanges with the world, resulting in China's development lagging behind the world trend in the later period, and it was also blind and arrogant, missing the development opportunity.

To correct it, China has never become a colony, and at worst it is a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society.

This is to be seen dialectically. In the early days, it was indeed able to defend against foreign enemies. However, in the later period, the shortcomings of the closed country gradually became apparent.

Because of the long-term isolation from the outside world, it has led to the inability to keep up with the trend of world development, and the ideology and utensils, and the political aspects are backward with the Western countries. So much so that in 1840 it began to degenerate into a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society.

Of course not, to a certain extent, the retreat policy promoted the small-scale peasant economy, although it hindered the economic development to a certain extent, but it still made the Qing Dynasty have a certain period of prosperity.

I don't agree, because if it's already closed, it won't become a colony of Western countries.

It's not a retreat policy, it's retreat arrogance. Communicate with others and learn more, so you don't have to be embarrassed by Namo!

It is precisely because of the retreat that he is arrogant and cannot see the advanced and powerful of the West, and he has fallen so badly.