Husbands and wives who are reluctant to evacuate from the floods trapped in the flood are typical of

Updated on society 2024-04-29
22 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Personally, I think it is a typical example of wanting money rather than life. Life is more important than everything, and without life, what is the use of money? They are completely unaware of the preciousness of life and the serious consequences of doing so.

    Just like this couple, if they don't evacuate, they are trapped in the flood, and in the end they have to spend more manpower and material resources to save them. Such an act is also too selfish, and it costs more of the state's possessions in order to protect one's personal property. <>

    This incident also objectively educates us that in the face of flood disasters, we must be calm and decisive in making trade-offs, which is the best way to deal with ourselves and society.

    First of all, it is necessary to objectively judge the situation and obey the command of the party and the state. If the country is in need, it can contribute its own strength to fight the flood and rescue together, which is the best situation. After all, everyone has a responsibility to protect their homeland, and to contribute their own efforts to protect their homeland is to protect the people and property they care about most.

    Even if you don't have the ability to contribute, then resolutely obey the command of the party and the state and move to a safe area. Remember that if you don't have enough time to retreat, you must follow the principle of life safety first. If you have enough time, bring your important documents and belongings that are convenient for you to carry.

    When the flood waters reced, we will rebuild our homes. <>

    Second, we must have a calm mind and deal with the crisis problems we encounter. If you accidentally enter the water, be sure to protect your body, look at the desirable objects around you, and try your best to swim to a relatively safe place and wait for rescue. As long as you are in a relatively safe area, there will definitely be our disaster relief personnel to save you, and it has always been the belief of our party and country not to abandon or give up any compatriot.

    Most of the time, natural and man-made disasters are unavoidable, but we must treat them properly. Don't lose your most important life for personal possessions. We must try to learn from the couple's incident, and don't lose a lot of money and money.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Husbands and wives who refuse to evacuate from the floods trapped in the flood are indeed typical of asking for money and not dying. A couple in the suburbs of Tongling and Yuezhou were reluctant to leave their belongings and locked themselves in their homes to avoid being persuaded to leave. Unexpectedly, the water level was too fast, and after dark, they realized that the situation was not right, and they had to call the police for help when it was difficult.

    This kind of behavior is very undesirable, and you can't ask for money and die!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Husband and wife are reluctant to evacuate from the trapped flood if they are reluctant to give up their finances, which is a typical example of asking for money and not dying, and the future property is greedy enough regardless of personal crisis!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Be. Refusing to evacuate because of the reluctance to finance, resulting in being trapped in the flood and worrying about his life, is typical of asking for money and not dying.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    This is a typical example of asking for money rather than dying. In the face of natural disasters, money is outside the body, and the most important thing to consider is the safety of their own lives, which not only harmed the couple, but also made the work of rescuers more difficult.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    This is indeed an example of wanting money and not dying, which is really undesirable, in a critical moment, money is something outside the body, and saving life is the most important thing.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    This is a typical example of asking for money and not dying, money can be earned again, life is gone, there is no more, life is only once.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It should be, the money can be earned again, but if the life is gone, it will be gone, and the green mountains will be left, not afraid of no firewood.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Here it isTypical money-hungry is dead, maybe the family is poorer and takes money more seriously, after all, money is more important than anything else in the eyes of the poor.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The typical couple had a hot brain and did stupid things. A miscalculation may have been at home for a while longer, and the disaster would have passed. You can keep your belongings, but you don't have to go out and run around. But how can a disaster be predicted? Don't play with life.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Scrooge has, what's the use of life without finances? Stay in the green mountains without worrying about no firewood! People who love money like their lives end up with nothing but money!

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    This should be a portrayal of reality, and it is also a manifestation of most people's humanity. As the saying goes: people die for money, birds die for food! That's it.

    Often, in the face of the hard-earned family business, they would rather use their lives to maintain it, and they will not hesitate to do so, in this case, people usually lose their minds. If there is no life, what is the point of having more family property and possessions? If we had thought rationally and calmly, we would not have made such a senseless sacrifice.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    This is the nature of being a human being, generally reluctant to give up money, only to force themselves to the most dangerous moment, often people at the end of their lives, will regret it, do not listen to anyone's persuasion, will be drunk, hope to save the straw, but it is too late, missed the best time, this is the greed of human nature.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    It shows that the couple loves their profession very much and is afraid that the unit will lose money to protect the financial evidence, and their husband and wife's performance is worthy of praise and praise.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    People die for money, birds die for food, a true portrayal.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Heavy rains have led to flooding in many places, and we all know that when the flood comes, in order to protect our own safety, we must evacuate in time, which is the safest way. In Tongling, Anhui Province, however, there was a couple who were reluctant to evacuate because they were reluctant to leave their belongings, and locked themselves in their home to avoid the staff who persuaded them to leave. Due to the heavy rain, the water level is very fast, and it will soon flood the village, after dark they perceived that the situation was wrong, the flood was about to spread to the home, so they had to choose to call the police for help, after receiving the alarm, the flood control headquarters immediately sent armed police to assist the police station to rescue, because the trapped people's mobile phones failed, unable to judge their location, rescuers can only rely on shouting loudly to find, after three and a half hours, finally succeeded in rescuing the couple.

    I think these two people are gambling with their lives, the flood is merciless, and money is not worth mentioning in front of life. <>

    When our lives are threatened, we should choose our lives without hesitation, because we don't know when the flood will come, and there is no point in guarding money, and we will lose our lives in vain. Money can be earned again when it is gone, life is only once, and only when we are alive will the money be meaningful. It is normal for people to lose their minds in the face of hard-earned family business, but if there is no life, what is the point of having more property?

    In this case, it is even more important to remain rational and not to make unnecessary sacrifices. <>

    Moreover, the two did not evacuate when they should have evacuated, and later asked the officers and men of the armed police to spend a lot of energy and time to come to the rescue, which is an irresponsible behavior; the officers and men of the armed police were already working very hard to fight the flood on the front line, but they had to distract their energy because of their obstinate actions, wasting the country's resources. <>

    Because he didn't give up his money, he pushed himself to the most dangerous time, and this incident also taught us a lesson, at all times, life comes first, and never give up life for something else, it's not worth it.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Yes, this is a gamble with life, because you refuse to evacuate and are trapped in the flood, and your life may be threatened later.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    This is called ignorance, who has been trapped in the flood and his life is threatened, but he is reluctant to give up his finances, and he is really gambling with his life.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Yes. In the precedent of the catastrophe in danger the property is incomparable. When a person is alive, he can start over with anything, but when he dies, everything is gone.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    This is really asking for money and not life, I really don't understand these people, their lives are gone, what's the use of asking for these things? No matter when it is most important to save your life, everything else can be done again.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    It's really gambling with their lives, because they see money as more important than their lives, which is very dangerous.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Husbands and wives have been in the water for finances, just gambling for money. It's very wrong, and it's also relatively stupid, and this kind of approach is just not correct.

Related questions
3 answers2024-04-29

1. There is a diligent path in Shushan, and there is no end to learning from the sea. >>>More

5 answers2024-04-29

1. Persuade the gentleman to drink a glass of wine, and there is no one in Yangguan in the west. —Wang Wei, "Weicheng Song". >>>More

24 answers2024-04-29

Wedge: engraving; She: Stop. Constantly carving, a metaphor for perseverance and perseverance. >>>More

16 answers2024-04-29

1. Rejection of luxury.

Not only themselves, they don't see others living a luxurious life, and when they find that the people around them are wasteful, they will reprimand each other mercilessly. After staying in this environment for a long time, the child will also be influenced by this view, and then he will follow their habits and become frugal in this regard. There are even times when the degree of frugality surpasses that of the parents, to the point of a kind of stinginess. >>>More

8 answers2024-04-29

1. I shake goodbye to you with my heart, and I hope that life will bring you countless hopes and lead you to the ideal world. >>>More