If a primary school student wins a national prize for his genetic research, will the award be invali

I think it's going to be invalid. For the sake of fairness, elementary school students must participate in the competition independently. Of course, there will be some people who feel that this is too harsh, after all, parents only provide some help, and it should not be invalidated. <>

Let me start by talking about the reasons why I think it will be invalid. There are several reasons for this: fairness; in terms of the purpose of the competition; Autonomy aspect.

Let's talk about fairness first, it is a competition between children, and the competition must emphasize a fair principle. The theme of the primary school student research contest indicates that the main body of the competition is primary school students. If parents are also involved, is it still called a primary school student research competition, or simply a family research competition; In terms of the purpose of the competition, the purpose of holding this competition is also to develop and motivate children's research interests and wisdom, and parents' participation in it obviously affects the child's potential and cannot be enough to show the child's talent; Finally, the autonomy aspect.

Parents help to do research, some parents are too doting on their children, and will help their children complete the research on this topic throughout the process, so where is the child independent, will it leave the parents, and will not be able to complete other subject research? Moreover, relying on the awards won by parents, it is not its own. Will it derail the child's outlook on life and think that only winning awards is the most important thing?

These are just a few of the opinions that I think it will be invalidated, and there are some people who believe that it should not be invalidated, and the reasons for this are analyzed from the following aspects.

First of all, in terms of children's training, parents help them participate in competitions, which is an encouragement, action and moral support for the children themselves. Nowadays, many parents are negligent in disciplining their children, especially in their children's learning, and they can't help at all. Looking at the degree of help from parents, most of the children's participation in the competition must be children's thinking, and parents only give help and hints to a certain extent, which does not affect the child's thinking and the initial effect of the entry. <>

In any case, it is certainly a child of courage to participate in the competition, and regardless of whether this award will be invalidated or not, the child can be regarded as having experienced this growth. Even if there is no trophy, the children have learned a lot of knowledge and increased their knowledge, which is the original purpose of our participation in the competition.

Of course, it will be invalidated, because this is a competition for elementary school students, and if there is parental intervention, it will be considered cheating, and the results will of course be invalidated.

I don't think it will be invalidated, although the parents have given a lot of help, but their own efforts are also very important, and they are still a child, so the award will not be invalid.

If the parents help him, the award should not be invalid, because after all, he still won the grand prize overall.

A primary school student in Kunming won an award for his research on colorectal cancer gene knockout, which attracted attention. The Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences responded on the 13th: After preliminary verification, the students of the award-winning project are the sons of researchers at the institute. At present, the institute has set up an investigation team to conduct an in-depth investigation.

Recently, a winning work entitled "Research on the function and mechanism of C10ORF67 in the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer" in the National Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition has attracted widespread attention. Some netizens found out that the parents of the primary school students involved were researchers from the Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and questioned that the child may have completed the research with the "help" of his parents.

On the 13th, the Kunming Institute of Zoology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences announced that after preliminary verification, the students of the award-winning project were the sons of researchers from the Kunming Institute of Zoology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. In response to this matter, the Kunming Institute of Zoology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences attaches great importance to it, and has set up an investigation team to conduct an in-depth investigation, and will timely feedback the relevant investigation results to the society.

The extracurricular scientific research projects of primary school students in China are more popular than the research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in terms of research topics.

In fact, the extracurricular research projects of middle school students are just as inexplicable, and the purpose of doing these is nothing more than a paper certificate, nothing more!

On July 12, Chen Moushi, a sixth-grade student of Panlong Primary School in Kunming City, Yunnan Province, won the National Youth Science and Technology Innovation Award by studying the mutant gene "function and mechanism in the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer", which was widely disseminated in social **. This incident has been questioned by netizens. Some netizens pointed out that such a level of scientific research is far beyond the cognitive range of a sixth-grade primary school student, so why can the student still win the award, and don't the judges question it?

Due to the doubts of the majority of netizens, the incident quickly fermented, on July 13, the Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences** issued a statement on the public opinion related to the award-winning results of the National Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition "Research on the function and mechanism of C10ORF67 in the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer": Recently, a national youth science and technology innovation competition named "C10orf67 in the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer function and mechanism research" The winning works of the National Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition have attracted widespread attention on the Internet and have been preliminarily verifiedThe students of this award-winning project are the sons of researchers of our institute. In response to this public opinion incident, our firm attaches great importance to it, and has set up an investigation team to conduct an in-depth investigation of this matter, and will timely feedback the relevant investigation results to the society in the future.

It is understood that there are now many children who have been given the label of "prodigy", and there are not a few similar "tall" primary and secondary school student research projects, so the judges may not have thought much about it.

Maybe it's because the judges feel that there are a lot of gifted elementary school students now, and it's normal.

Maybe there's some secret behind it. A primary school student can write such a high-level ** judge without questioning it, which must have something to do with the student's parents.

Mainly because the ability of this elementary school student is very strong in itself, and even if there is guidance, it is very normal.

I think this elementary school student must have been helped by his parents, but he should have some opinions on this aspect, and he should not have written everything according to his parents' words from beginning to end, but should also have his own feelings. I think we should learn to encourage a primary school student to have such a self-motivated spirit, rather than that many people will question him wildly as soon as this incident happens, which will also hit the child's self-esteem and self-confidence. In general, many people question this elementary school student, because they feel that this elementary school student understands too much and writes a little too high a level of essays, so they don't believe it.

Studying genes? This kind of research requires a lot of knowledge and scientific equipment, which is not available to primary school students. It's definitely fake, don't be deceived by online rumors.

His father was a researcher, with a Ph.D. or master's degree under his command, and he used the results of their work for his own children, probably the kind of teacher who was said to have forced his students to death.

The genetic results of the research may be true, but it is not a primary school student who did it, either a doctor under his father, or his father himself went into battle.

Zhihu looked at it.

Recently, the news that a sixth-grade primary school student in Kunming, Yunnan Province, won a national award for his research on cancer genes has detonated major networks. So can elementary school students have that much potential? I don't think so, even if the IQ of an elementary school student is reached, it is unlikely that he will have the physical fitness to complete such a high-intensity experiment, and from the revocation of the grand prize, it can be known that it was all faked by his father, and the father who did all this I think should beThose who should be punished, after all, scientific research must have the spirit of seeking truth and cannot be deceitful

It is understood that the project won by the primary school student is to study the mutated gene of colorectal cancer, and this kind of project is not completely sure that even if some doctoral students come, they can do it well. In the past, there were also some middle school students in China who were able to publish ** on the knowledge network, but it was a middle school student, and now the high-end project of studying cancer genes was actually taken away by a primary school student, which is really like what some netizens said: The main force of China's scientific research turned out to be primary school students.

Recently, the Chinese Academy of Sciences also issued a statement confirming that the parents of the primary school student who won the prize in the National Youth Science and Technology Competition are researchers of the Academy of Sciences. Then this matter becomes interesting, is this elementary school student really a child prodigy, or are these two researchers' parents desperate for their children's future path?

Now the situation that elementary school students can win the cancer gene project award can be exposed to the table, which shows how unauthoritative the judges of this kind of competition are. And the experimental report presented in this award shows that this elementary school student didn't even know what genes were at first, so how did a primary school student who didn't even know about genes complete such a high-end project as a cancer project in just a few months?

Even if someone instructs the child in the detailed experimental operation steps, then a primary school student does not have the idea to complete this kind of experiment, let alone a primary school student can really enter the cell room to perform such a complex experiment? Does he have the relevant operating qualifications? You must know that the cell line in this experimental subject has a certain oncogenes, and once it is not operated properly, it is easy to be infected with the virus, and the child's entry into the cell room itself is a violation of the operation, not to mention that if the primary school student really operates it himself, will his parents rest assured?

I believe that although our country advocates innovation, we should not cheat on our children's academics. Although there are countless cases of parents arranging competitions for elementary school students in various places, it is not too inappropriate to do this on such a high-end topic. Although the short-term may bring a lot of honor to the child, it is easy for the child to form a dependence in the long run, and the child's growth still depends on himself after all, only in this way can he not run into a wall in the future society.

Such a father must be punished, the upper beam is not right and the lower beam is crooked, his behavior is cheating, he will teach bad children, and in the future, children will learn what to do with him, and they must let them know the seriousness of the matter.

Penalties must be given. Knowing that primary school students will not be able to complete this, and still engaging in these to help primary school students complete them, is actually contributing to a bad atmosphere. If it is not punished, such things will be indispensable in the future.

Such a father who pursues fame and fortune really shouldn't work in the research institute, whether as a father or a researcher, he shouldn't do such shameless behavior, elementary school students don't know anything about the world, and this father should be dismissed from his job if he does this.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences responded that an investigation team has been set up to conduct a thorough investigation into this matter and will give them the truth.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences responded that the child who won the award was the child of a researcher at their institute.

The competition in the innovation competition for primary school students is becoming more and more fierce, and some parents are trying their best to pave the way for their children in order to win above the starting line. A student has been questioned about winning an award for his research. The Chinese Academy of Sciences responded, saying that the student was a child of their research institute, and whether their research results belonged to the child's own research would be followed up by a detailed investigation and then announced to the public.

Such an achievement is a big role for small people, and it can be done very well. He's already a genius. Some of the most powerful people, super cows.

In fact, there is the help of the researcher's father, which is the research result of his father.

In my opinion, this is certainly not something that a schoolboy can do, it must be his parents who gave him the results of their research.

This is because elementary school students have grown up in a scientific research environment since childhood, and they are very intelligent and have a very good IQ, so they can make such achievements.

Because the parents of this elementary school student are people who study related technologies, he gave his results to his children in order to win the award. The parents of the schoolboy were also dealt with seriously afterwards.