Which is the hero Liu Bang or Xiang Yu???

A very old topic, since ancient times, these two have mixed reviews, some praise, some bad comments. Of course, no one is perfect.

For Xiang Yu, they all think that this is a hero, his life is also a standard tragic hero, and the tragic hero is more emotional, people sigh that Xiang Yu values love and righteousness, loves soldiers like sons, and is brave and good at fighting, but Xiang Yu pits to kill and surrender soldiers, burn Xianyang Palace, steal and dig the mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang, and kill the righteous emperor, it is rarely mentioned, although Xiang Yu says that he loves soldiers like children, but he is not popular with the people, Xiang Yu's army slaughtered the city and buried all the people in the city alive. He was hated by the people, but the people of that time were no longer there.

For Liu Bang, he is often evaluated by later generations as a villain and a hooligan. But I think Liu Bang is a hero!

1 After Liu Bang entered the customs, he was loved by the local people, and they were afraid that Liu Bang would not be the king of Guanzhong.

2 Liu Bang has clear rewards and punishments, and he will use people.

3 Liu Bang is generous.

4. Liu Bang understands that there is no informality in big things.

I think both of them are heroes.

The above is just a personal opinion, please put forward any other comments.

I think it's Xiang Yu, although he said that he became the king and lost the king, but after Liu Bang became the emperor, he killed all his brothers who were born and died, and the cunning rabbit died and the dog cooked, Liu Bang is just a villain, a bear.

Liu Bang is not a hero, he is not good at doing things, he can be said to be a hero, he doesn't have much ability, the most successful place is to employ people, Han Gaozu's team can be described as very perfect. Xiang Yu belongs to the tragic hero, in fact, he is not a hero, he is basically a lonely person, but because he has no scheming and does not know how to engage in conspiracy, he is a very simple person, with the evolution of history, he has been constantly elevated, and he has almost become an idol, and he is almost the same as a hero.

Both, from a different point of view.

Liu Bang can bend and stretch, persevere, know people and make good use of them.

Xiang Yu is brave and ambitious.

Liu Bang: The winner is king, the loser is the villain, and this kind of person can live very well.

Xiang Yu. The charisma is very strong.

At that time, there were countless fans.

Of course, it's Xiang Yu, a tragic hero. Liu Bang is a hero.

It depends on how you understand the word "hero".

Since ancient times, Cheng Kou worshipped Kou, but only Chu and Han were exceptional, and Cheng Kou worshiped the king's ......

1, Xiang Yu is a subordinate minister, and he is now in Suqianxi, Jiangsu; Xiang Yu, whose real name is from Suqian. At the time of birth, the nationality belonged to Chu, and the Chu people were also. The general of the King of Chu Xiongxin, the general of the Chu Emperor Xiongxin, Sun Lu. Xiang Yu's fifth ancestor, Xiang Ying, a native of Gusu, was born in Yue.

2. Liu Bang is a native of Zhongyangli, Fengyi, Pei County, and is now a native of Fengxian County, Jiangsu; Liu Bangzhi, whose real name is Ji, is a native of Pei County. Born in Pei, grown up in Pei, the incident is called Pei Gong Kuan. At the time of birth, the nationality belonged to Chu, and the Chu people were also.

The general of the King of Chu Xiongxin, the general of the Chu Emperor Xiongxin. Succeeded, he was canonized by Emperor Xiongxin of Chu as the King of Han. Liu Bangzhi, whose real name is Ji, is a native of Pei County.

Born in Pei, grew up in Pei, and called himself Pei Gong when he started an incident. At the time of birth, the nationality belonged to Chu, and the Chu people were also. The general of the King of Chu Xiongxin, the general of the Chu Emperor Xiongxin.

Succeeded, he was canonized as the king of Han by Emperor Xiongxin of Chu.

The difference between Liu Bang and Xiang Yu determined the direction of the Chu-Han War, and the difference between the two can be described as earth-shaking, we mainly list the following points:

1. Liu Bang is good at employing people, while Xiang Yu lacks the insight to recognize people. Liu Bang knows people well, and his subordinates have gathered a group of capable materials. Take the most famous "Han San Rang Nianjie" as an example, Zhang Liang, who can strategize, can strategize under him; Xiao He, who is good at operation, dares to hand over the rear to him; Military genius Han Xin, he dared to directly seal the general.

Liu Bang is good at putting the right people in the right position to attack and annihilate, and he is eclectic in employing people. Xiang Yu is not good at employing people, Xiang Bo is far away from Fan Zeng, although Xiang Yu has five tiger generals, but it is difficult to hide the defects in his employment, his employment is all based on personal likes and dislikes, Han Xin, Chen Ping have been under Xiang Yu, because they can not play their own value before switching to Liu Bang.

Second, Liu Bang is good at listening to opinions, while Xiang Yu seems to be stubborn and self-serving. "What to do for it" is Liu Bang's most praised mantra, but everyone knows that this frank Zen trap shows Liu Bang's great wisdom, Liu Bang's subordinates can rest assured and boldly put forward opinions to him, and for his most trusted adviser Zhang Liang, Liu Bang has always been obedient. In contrast, Xiang Yu couldn't get a lot of good advice here, and if he didn't listen to Fan Zeng's words and let Liu Bang go at the Hongmen banquet, he really let the tiger return to the mountain, leaving a huge hidden danger.

Third, Liu Bang has a villain style, while Xiang Yu is a frank gentleman. Liu Bang was born in the city, has the self-interest of a businessman, is ruthless and hypocritical, and has kicked his children out of the carriage three times for his own life, and is vulgar and likes to scold people. In contrast, Xiang Yu was born in an aristocratic family, was frank and open-minded, acted above board, and had a strong heroic spirit.

Of course, a gentleman often can't be a villain.