Traffic accident problems are rewarded with 100 points urgent

According to your supplementary explanation, it can be understood that this is not a question of the helper and the helped, and it can be handled as a simple traffic accident. Your friend is your passenger, and since the traffic police have ruled that you are fully responsible for the accident, you should be responsible for your friend's ** expenses and the vehicle on the opposite side. It depends on the insurance situation of your car, the car you hit can be handled by the traffic police, the insurance company will pay according to the amount of third-party liability insurance, as for your friend to see whether your car is also in the occupant insurance, if there is an insurance company will also compensate him, it is not easy to do it, only you bear all his costs.

In fact, introducing the project to your friend is to help him make money, and no one wants to have an accident, if your friend is a sensible person, it is better to do it, otherwise you will be unlucky. Let's discuss it with your friend and see what his attitude is. It really couldn't be negotiated, and I had to meet in court.

It's no problem for you to lose money when you go to the court, but the court will deal with it according to the regulations, and he won't open his mouth.

Good luck here and pay more attention to safety in the future.

The person being helped should be compensated. If the contract is signed, it will be done according to what the contract says, and if it is not signed, the person being helped will make a verbal agreement since someone else has helped. Being helped to have a profit or a benefit.

There should also be corresponding responsibilities. It has been said on TV on this legal issue that it is a passer-by who rescues a lost child, and the rescued person is rescued, and the rescuer dies, and the rescued person must be compensated in law. There are many more cases of the same.

You're in charge of this! It doesn't matter where you drive in a traffic accident! I just care if you are responsible for a traffic accident, you have insurance! Then it'll be fine! The responsibility is for you! Your friend's medical expenses are also sure to be paid by you! ~

According to the description of the accident, although you have called the police due to the situation of the injured at the scene, you have taken the injured to leave the accident scene before the traffic police arrive at the scene to collect evidence, and there is no monitoring data on the accident road section as proof of the accident, if the traces left by the accident scene are not enough to prove the accident process or the basis for the analysis of the cause of the accident, according to the current situation, it is more likely that the motor vehicle party will be mainly responsible or fully responsible. (Because there is no evidence at the scene to prove that the other party is obviously at fault, and the other party's electric vehicle is usually identified as a non-motor vehicle type, coupled with a comprehensive analysis of the serious injuries of the other party's personnel, it shows that the evidence is unfavorable to the motor vehicle party).

On the issue of advance payment, in principle, before the traffic police issue a formal certificate, no party has the obligation to advance expenses, it is recommended to keep the relevant documents of the advance expenses, if you can no longer afford to pay more expenses can be temporarily stopped, waiting for the identification of the traffic police department. If it has not been reported to the insurance company for the record, it should be done as soon as possible.

At present, the amount of compensation cannot be accurately estimated, and the loss costs of the other party are basically composed of medical expenses, lost work expenses, direct property losses, death and disability compensation (such as further development of the subsequent injured person's condition), etc., which can only be determined after the injured person's condition is stabilized.

Guangdong Traffic Accident Lawyer:

1. Rear-end collision accidents depend on whether your brother's car was speeding at that time, whether it was driving normally, whether there was a problem with the lights of the other party's car, whether there was a slowdown for no reason or a sudden failure and needed to pull over. Since your brother is no longer there, the cause of the accident may not be investigated. If the accident certificate issued by the traffic police says that "the responsibility for the accident cannot be clarified", then in fact the responsibility is fifty-five points.

2. The law only stipulates that the case must be reported in a timely manner. It cannot be understood as an accident at 2:41, 2:

If you report the case at 42 points, it is a timely report, and if you report the case at 2:43, it is a delay in reporting the case. According to the specific situation, the other party should have saved people and fires before reporting the case, and it should not be too late to report the case at 3 o'clock.

In addition, the time of reporting the accident generally does not affect the determination of accident responsibility, unless an accident occurs today and the case is reported tomorrow, it must be fully responsible.

Rear-end collision should be fully responsible, but it is necessary to figure out whether the other party is exercising or parking, and if the other party is parking, it should also bear a certain responsibility, which is generally secondary responsibility. The Evening News case is not directly related to traffic liability.

Parking on the side of the road, obstructing traffic, and being responsible for accidents.

Drunk driving, unlicensed, and negligent collision into a parked vehicle on the side of the road are primarily responsible for the accident.

Normally, in addition to compulsory traffic insurance, the primary liability is 70%, and the secondary liability is 30%, considering that the motorcycle in this case did not wear a helmet to aggravate the head injury, the motorcycle side can be greater than 70%, and the other party is less than 30%.

Unlicensed has no effect on accidents, and the specific treatment is as follows**.

Because the owner is drunk, unlicensed, and not wearing a helmet, he should pay 80%-90% of the responsibility, and you should pay 20%-10% of the responsibility! Also, I don't know if parking is possible on that national highway! The current law is:

In the event of a car accident, both parties should be held responsible, regardless of whether one party is at fault or not, and the party at fault should pay most of the responsibility.

Secondary Liability. The injured person is primarily responsible.

On September 1, 2004, Yang Shilong drove his younger brother Yang Shihu's light van from Sichuan to Shaanxi. Due to fatigue driving, when the car drove to the Mianning Expressway, a traffic accident occurred with Wang Tao, who was riding a bicycle with two people, causing one death and two injuries on the spot. The traffic management department of Ningqiang County determined that Yang Shilong was primarily responsible, and Wang Tao and three others were secondarily responsible.

In September 2004, the Ningqiang Court accepted the lawsuit filed by the relatives of the deceased, demanding that Yang Shilong. During the trial, the plaintiff increased its claim for moral damages.

The court found that the Mianning Expressway is a fully enclosed, toll-type high-grade highway that prohibits pedestrians and bicycles. The senior management office is the manager of the highway, and the highway management office did not repair and strengthen the damage to the protective nets on both sides of the highway in a timely manner, and the defendant Wang Tao, the victim Luo Runlin, and Xia Baolin all entered the highway through the damaged gap, and the defendant Wang Tao violated the law by riding a bicycle on the highway and leading people before and after, and should bear the corresponding civil liability; The defendant's senior management office was the manager of the expressway, and due to management defects, he failed to repair the damaged parts of the protective net in a timely manner and lost his protective function, so he should bear the corresponding fault liability, and the victim Luo Runlin was a person with limited civil capacity, and his guardian failed to conscientiously perform his guardianship duties, and should also bear corresponding responsibility for the consequences of the damage. The trial court ruled that:

by Yang Shilong, Yang Shihu,. Dissatisfied, the senior management appealed.

After hearing the case, the Hanzhong Intermediate People's Court held that the senior management office was the manager of the expressway, and failed to fulfill its management duties in the exercise of its management duties, failed to repair the damage to the expressway's protective network in a timely manner, and failed to take other necessary safety measures, so that it lost its protective function, and therefore did not support its appeal request for not being liable, and the court of first instance found that the facts were clear and the law was correctly applied, and ruled to reject the appeal in accordance with the relevant provisions of Article 150, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. The original judgment was affirmed.

In the event of a traffic accident, the parties should keep the scene and call the police, call 120 (send to the hospital**) to treat the injured in a timely manner, and drive a motor vehicle on the road to have the principle of giving way, slowing down and stopping first.

If you can be sure that it is not caused by a traffic accident, ignore the other party.

If you can't confirm it, you can go to medical insurance.

Parents of children are responsible, because the children are still young, and the parents do not fulfill their supervisory responsibilities, which will reduce the responsibility of the driver.

However, in any case, it is the driver who is mainly responsible for encountering a child, unless there is an external interference, such as a car that happens to hit you, and you hit the child in order to avoid danger, but if this situation does not occur, then the driver is still mainly responsible.

In the case of an incapacitated person, the guardian of the incapacitated person and the driver are jointly responsible, and the driver bears the main responsibility.

The responsibility of the traffic police determines that the car must be fully responsible. However, when compensating, you only need to pay between 50% and 80%, and the specific amount can be negotiated or decided by the court.

The child's parents have not fulfilled their guardianship duties, so they have to bear at least about 20% of the responsibility. If the child is replaced by an incapacitated person, the result is the same, and the guardian bears the responsibility for the failure of guardianship.

Whether the owner of the car should be held responsible depends on the accident determination of the traffic police department, but the parents of the child should bear part of the responsibility.

In particular, this lawyer reminds that any legal issue has its own particularity and complexity, and that some facts and truths may not be in line with their original legal status after being examined with a non-professional eye. Therefore, in the absence of the original materials and the detailed description of the events you consulted, the lawyer only makes an advisory opinion based on your simple description and in accordance with laws and regulations, which is only used as a reference for your analysis, and cannot and should not be directly used as a guide for you to handle legal affairs and guide legal proceedings.

If my answer is helpful to you, for, thank you.

Zongheng Legal Network-Shandong Shunqi Law Firm-Yang Guoying Lawyer.

First, if the accident occurred in the daytime, the tractor driver has driving qualifications (with a driver's license), and the safety performance of the tractor vehicle meets the standards, B drunk driving the motor vehicle does not ensure the safety of driving and does not maintain a safe distance sufficient for emergency braking from the car in front is the direct cause of the accident, and should bear full responsibility for the accident.

Second, if the incident occurred at night (with very poor visibility) or in bad weather such as rain and snow, the tractor did not drive in the prescribed lane or the tail warning light was damaged, etc., it may bear a secondary responsibility.

Third, it goes without saying that the compensation in the first case depends on the specific age of the deceased, the location of the household registration, and whether there are dependents.

Thanks, plus points.

There are too many factors that determine responsibility, and you are not too detailed, listen to me give you an analysis:

The first type: If you are all complete with the license procedures for people and vehicles, you are all motor vehicles, rear-end collision, and the rear car will pay full responsibility; Party B can only claim 10,000 yuan for personnel and 100 yuan for property loss according to Party A's compensation for non-liability property loss according to the compulsory traffic insurance.

The second type: your license is complete, his procedures are not complete, then it depends on the way the traffic police deal with it, it is estimated that your responsibility is very little, but the other party is dead, it is estimated that you have to pay some, the responsibility is 1-2, not more.

The third type: your procedures are not complete, then it is difficult to say, the traffic police will determine the division of responsibility accidents according to the situation on the spot, such as whether it is speeding, violations and other factors. It is estimated that 55 points are more likely!

Death compensation is more standard in the area where the deceased is located, and it has something to do with his work and household registration, so you need to investigate! For example, if the other party is a worker, you have to pay his later wages and support, and if he is only a farmer, you have to pay mainly for support. However, there is a minimum payout in each place.

You need to explain yourself and the other party's situation again, and we can give you specific analysis and suggestions!

If you say it, then it is B rear-end, it should be B who is fully responsible, and the tractor is insured?? At least there is a compulsory traffic risk!! It's easier to deal with this way!!

I think the latter is more responsible, and it is recommended that the traffic police issue an accident certificate.

The main cause of this accident is that Party B's vehicle rear-ended Party A caused Party B's personnel **, if Party A's vehicle documents are fully verified, the motor vehicle compulsory traffic insurance is valid, and there are no other traffic violations (such as speeding, overloading, etc.), the traffic police should determine that Party B is fully responsible.

If it is determined that Party B is fully responsible, Party B can only claim a maximum of 10,000 yuan from Party A for the amount of non-liability compensation personnel and 100 yuan for the loss of non-responsible property according to Party A's compulsory traffic insurance.

In fact, if Party A has a traffic violation or is not the main fault that caused the accident, because Party B has personnel, it is also possible that the traffic police will determine that Party A bears certain responsibility, but it will not exceed the amount of secondary liability. If Party A determines secondary liability, then Party B can claim compensation from Party A for car damage, personal injury**, lost time pay, death compensation and other claims, which need to be calculated according to the local income level. After the maximum amount of Party A's compulsory traffic insurance of 10,000 yuan is paid in full, Party A or its commercial third-party insurance shall bear 30% of the excess

1. The determination of responsibility is subject to the traffic accident certificate issued by the traffic police, and it is necessary to see the evidence of the accident, including the vehicle inspection report, etc., but according to the analysis of the situation you provided above, under normal circumstances, B should be fully responsible, and A is not responsible.

2. The provisions of traffic accident compensation are inconsistent in many places, and traffic accidents between motor vehicles and non-motor vehicles in many places, even if the motor vehicle is not responsible, it should also bear a certain amount of compensation liability, generally not more than 10%, and some local regulations do not exceed 20%, and the specific proportion and amount of responsibility need to be determined in combination with the provisions of your province, autonomous region and municipality directly under the Central Government. Under the premise that Party A is not responsible, if the tractor has compulsory traffic insurance, the compulsory traffic insurance shall first bear the liability for compensation, and if there is no responsibility, the compulsory traffic insurance shall bear 11,000 compensation for death and disability, 1,000 for medical expenses without liability compensation, and 100 for property loss without liability compensation, totaling 12,100 yuan. If there is no compulsory traffic insurance, because the owner of the tractor is at fault, within the scope of the compulsory traffic insurance, the 12,100 yuan that should be borne by the uninsured compulsory traffic insurance shall be compensated first, and then Party B shall be compensated according to the compensation limit stipulated by the local regulations.

3. If it is the primary and secondary liability, the tractor's compulsory traffic insurance will be compensated within the liability limit of 122,000, if there is no compulsory traffic insurance, because the owner of the tractor is at fault, the compensation of 122,000 yuan should be borne by the uninsured compulsory traffic insurance within the scope of the compulsory traffic insurance, and the remaining part will be shared according to the local accident liability standard. The compensation ratio of each province, autonomous region and municipality directly under the Central Government is different, and it needs to be determined in conjunction with local regulations.