Opening arguments at the beginning of the debate Opening the book is not necessarily beneficial

1.Today's classmates may like to read martial arts, romance only **, books and periodicals, sometimes to the extent of forgetting to sleep and eating, and not letting go of the book, once they are lost in books, they will go crazy, then they only think about books in class, and they don't have the heart to study, and their grades will plummet. There are also people who are attracted by some of the plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes go down the path of crime.

Isn't this a harm to yourself by reading books?

2.We read books and have a choice. Don't read books that aren't healthy and don't help us much.

If we want to read books, we should read some books that are conducive to our physical and mental health, and helpful to our study and life. Such a book is a good book, and only by reading a good book will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends, reading good books, that is, making good friends, will progress; If you don't read a good book, of course, you will make friends with people who can't make friends, and then you will regress.

Because those who are close to Zhu are red, and those who are close to ink are black! So, only good books will be good for you. Therefore, my opinion is:

Unbook is not necessarily beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can choose to read. And don't ruin your life by reading the wrong book, leading yourself astray.

3.Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness." "Since the book is a medicine, it has two functions: one is a good medicine, and the medicine is to eliminate the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it?

4.A bad book is like a bad friend, it can kill you." It's not false at all, now some students are obsessed with martial arts or romance**, reading those grotesque books all day long, and "throwing" their homework aside, resulting in a decline in academic performance, and finally creating a bamboo basket to draw water.

Think about it, can it be said that "opening" such a book "volume" is "beneficial"? "A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what kind of book is opened.

5.There are also many cases of crimes committed by reading pornographic books and periodicals in the community. Yes, in a way, there is some truth to what you are saying, but we should also see the other side of it, which is the negative side, and we don't think that opening the book is necessarily beneficial.

6.There are good books, bad books, and even "poisonous books", how can you open them and read them indiscriminately? Moreover, those so-called comic books such as "Oolong Courtyard", "Journey to the West" and "Winter Solstice Snow" seem to have a special appetite for our primary school students.

Do you think, what can you do if your eyes are staring at you motionless, the content is unhealthy, and your eyesight is declining? Not to mention the undesirable books about love killings, fortune telling, and malicious ridicule of historical figures, which have a very bad impact on us children, and it is really wonderful not to open the book.

7.Someone read a book about religion, fell ill and died, just chattering there, and finally died of exhaustion.

I think it's beneficial to open the book. Gorky said, "Books are the ladder of human progress."

Read more and you will increase your knowledge. Isn't Edison an example? He read a lot of books, got inspired by them, and did a lot of practice before he invented the electric light.

The world's famous Bacon once said: "History makes people wise, poetry makes people wise, mathematics makes people fine, naturalism makes people profound, and ethics makes people dignified." These many meanings can be summed up in one word:

Reading is a rewarding experience.. If we don't read much, where will we get so much knowledge? If we don't have knowledge, how can we discern who is right from wrong?

Books are the summary of historical experience, and books are the crystallization of social culture. Reading can lead to a thorough understanding of the truth of life; Reading can give insight into the vicissitudes of the world; Reading can help people all over the world. If we don't read much, where will we get the rich words to write essays?

Marx opened the book and benefited a lot. When he wrote Capital, he read more than 1,000 volumes of books from his own collection, and he also went to the British Museum to see books from three houses. If Marx hadn't opened the book, he might not have been able to write Capital.

Wen Ye, a sophomore student at Hangzhou No. 4 High School, has been reading books since he was a child. Not only has a wide range of knowledge, but also excellent in arts and sciences, he has also published more than 30 articles in many newspapers and periodicals, and won five awards for essays. Isn't it enough for a 17-year-old student to have such an achievement to show that "open books are beneficial"?

If people want to become talents, and if they want to help the world, they must open the book and read. We read a lot, and when we see books that are not healthy for our body and mind, we can identify them as soon as we read them, and we will not read them again and buy them again. "I have read more than 10,000 books, and my pen is like a god.

Another example is "Read 10,000 books, travel 10,000 miles." "Reading is good. I hope you will take action quickly!

You're on the right side, aren't you? When I was in college, I debated the first and fourth debates.

Here's how the argument goes:

First of all, enterprise development is a boat against the current, and if you don't advance, you will retreat.

The process of the enterprise is always in the environment of market competition, so it must continue to improve to have a stronger competitiveness.

Second, truth-seeking refers to being realistic, objectively or calmly observing in order to gain a correct understanding of objective reality. An enterprise's truth-seeking and practice are inseparable, there is a famous saying: the paper is shallow, and you must know that you have to do it; There is a proverb today:

Practice is the only criterion for testing truth. Therefore, if an enterprise wants to withstand the long-term test, it must start from the basic link in a down-to-earth manner.

Speaking of truth-seeking, I can't help but think of the recent "capsule incident" that has had a huge repercussion. CCTV in early April.

**Some enterprises in Hebei use leather waste to boil industrial gelatin, sell it to some unscrupulous enterprises to make medicinal capsules, and finally flow into pharmaceutical companies and enter the abdomen of patients. What a sin this is! Poisonous jelly and poisonous old yogurt are still suspicious, the poison capsule turmoil has risen again, and there is even a spoof joke on the Internet that "leather shoes are very busy".

Busy being refined into industrial gelatin, adulterated into food by unscrupulous businessmen, and eaten into the stomach by consumers. Plus the previous Sudan dyes.

Black-hearted eggs, gypsum noodles, poisoned milk powder, gutter oil.

Clenbuterol - what else can we eat with confidence? What else can't be faked?!

It is true that innovation is important, and innovation is a prerequisite for a business to flourish, but please don't forget what is this, what can be done, and what cannot be done! If an enterprise can't even be "realistic", then in the face of it, the lieutenant general will perish!

To sum up, we believe that truth-seeking is more important than innovation in the development of enterprises!

Thank you! ——In a debate, first explain the definition of the words in the viewpoint, then cite the scriptures, list examples, and express them in contrast, argumentation, comparison, lyricism, etc. Especially those related words.

Be sure to accentuate the tone and be imposing! The last paragraph should be lyrical. It's best to memorize the manuscript during the competition, and then face the judges and the audience generously.

And don't forget to use polite language.

Well, that's about it, and if you don't know what, ask me again.

These are written by me based on the materials, but you can also find more information and organize the language yourself. Hope it helps!

Many things in the world are pros and cons, and the Internet is no exception. The Internet is like a big river, churning down with pearls and sediment, spreading civilization and dumping garbage, opening up people's wisdom and creating ignorance. In terms of the relationship between it and the development of college students, on the one hand, the Internet, as a new mass communication medium and communication mode, greatly meets people's needs for information resource sharing and communication beyond time and space limitations. On the other hand, the network itself has certain shortcomings, and the network environment is often complex and lacks effective management and protection.

We believe that the impact of the Internet on college students will do more harm than good. Due to the fact that the psychological development of college students is not very mature enough, some college students lack the ability to screen and filter information such as "network culture", network environment and network communication. Therefore, in the current situation where school education focuses on academic performance, and some students cannot keep up with the pressure of academics and employment, the Internet can easily become a "bomb shelter" for some college students to avoid the burden and pressure, so that some people are addicted to it and cannot extricate themselves.

As a result, a small number of students are addicted to online entertainment and have no desire to learn, and some students use the Internet to cause a decline in their moral level, which is shown in the survey results and mentioned in the example above. They all agree with the view that "there are three major harms in the online world: violent games, addictive chatting, and excessive pornography", and the phenomenon of online dating occurs from time to time.

In the survey of college students' views on online dating, only 49% of them are against online dating, and 51% can try online dating. Some students also have online dating experience. College students spend too much time on the Internet, which reduces the time spent on outdoor activities, which is not conducive to the communication between classmates, and also easily leads to the decline of physical fitness.

For example, the unfavorable factors of addiction to the Internet, which not only affects learning, but also increases the financial burden of parents, have affected the learning and physical and mental health of college students. There are even some students who are addicted to the Internet during the holidays and ignore a lot of things they really do. Therefore, we believe that the impact of the Internet on college students will do more harm than good.

Opening books that are unhealthy and age-inappropriate is not only harmful, but also harmful to the body and mind!!

What is it? I don't know, I'm here too.

Against: Yes, that's exactly what you said.

First of all, your bounty is too stingy for the opening argument. When others ask for a theory, I will only take a look at it if there is a reward of fifteen hungry points. I don't think you're likely to get a serious argument.

I won't be celebrating, but I'll tell you about it. I'm just a matter of pointing.

Your thesis is: humans are not destroyers of the environment.

Definition: What the environment is, in the broadest possible way, to include human beings in the environment. Destruction?

What is sabotage? Cutting down trees? Take out the trash?

The farts released by cattle and sheep create exhaust gases that cause as much damage to the ozone layer as car exhaust every year. (Check it yourself if you have the information).

Arguments: First: the environment is not static, but changes all the time, what is destruction and what is construction and maintenance?

Second: Human beings themselves are created by the environment, and they are held in the environment, we are just changing the environment, why is it called destruction?

Do the above work yourself, and then it's time for your opening argument.