Where do you think the boundaries between plagiarism and borrowing are?

You put someone else's essay on the table and glance at someone else's writing of your own. Then you are plagiarizing. On the other hand, if you read other people's articles first, and then you write your own articles, you don't read other people's articles.

The written article naturally has the shadow of that person's article. This can barely be counted as a reference, of course, if the article is only one or two hundred words, it is difficult to judge. This is probably vaguely used as a boundary.

Plagiarism is very shameful, it is simply the copyright of the impression of others, the original meaning of plagiarism is to move other people's original text over to change the name and the name of the protagonist, for a period of time it was very popular that Guo Jingming plagiarized "Inside and Outside the Circle", and changed this book to "How Much Do You Know About the Flowers in Your Dreams", of course, the similarity of this book is as high as 80%, except that the title of the cover book and the full text of the protagonist are basically the same. Borrowing from this is not everyone can do a good job, for example, borrowing is to decorate and package other good articles through their own language to make more exquisite articles, compared to plagiarism, it is also talented, just like science and technology are on the basis of the original to make it more perfect, more gorgeous, so as to show their own unique style!

Plagiarism is a form of disrespect for the copyright of the original author, without the will of the original author, and without declaring in one's own work that it is based on a certain text. It's like ** citation and annotation, but plagiarism is directly used to become your own. And borrowing is just a trigger for inspiration.

It's like a detective solving a crime, the same little thing inspires the detective clues, and the work takes this opportunity to create something of its own, with its own label.

If it's common sense, it's not, like a general sense introduction and explanation of history. As follows: History, abbreviated as history, generally refers to the history of human society, which is a discipline that records and explains a series of historical events in the course of human activities, and most of the time it is also a reflection of the current era.

If it is just a summary and mapping, then history, as an existence, should disappear. The problem of history is to constantly discover the true past, to use materials to speak, and how people can become discussable issues in reality. History is extended.

History is the inheritance, accumulation and expansion of culture, and the trajectory of human civilization. In addition, when borrowing, we should at least write the name of the writer, which is the least respect we have for the creator. It's best to write the source like writing **.

This avoids the suspicion of plagiarism.

From the legal context of the Copyright Law (Copyright), "plagiarism" should be dismantled as "illegal-copying", and "borrowing" can be disassembled as "legal-derivation". Whether "copying" or "deduction" itself is neutral. Without the permission of the copyright owner and without a statutory exemption, it may be illegal to perform an act controlled by an exclusive right (reproduction or derivative act).

In this way, it is also possible to "borrow" immorally!

Borrowing is the consistency of thought, it is the integration of other people's thoughts into your own thoughts, you have to think about it with your brain, and in the end what you get is the result of your wisdom. In fact, sometimes borrowing is unavoidable. For example, if you particularly like an author and always read his articles, then you will unconsciously use his penmanship and thoughts when writing articles.

Borrowing is borrowing other people's ideas to support or support one's latest arguments, while plagiarism is filling all or the main results of oneself with other people's ideas.

First, the reference is different.

1. Reference: Compare with other people's or other things in order to learn or learn from them.

2. Plagiarism: copy other people's works and answers as your own.

Second, the focus is different.

2. Plagiarism: Focus on copying without alteration.

3. Different citations and usages.

1. Reference: Qin Mu "Art Sea Picks Shells: Southern Bonsai": "Art departments can always learn from each other. ”

You must understand the difference between borrowing and plagiarism, otherwise you will never get ahead and will lose all your money.

Imitation is the first step in creation, and imitation is the first form of learning. , while plagiarism takes the cloning "shortcut" of CTRL C; The results are even more different:

2. Difference in meaning. The result of imitation is innovation, and the result of plagiarism is to get it for nothing and plagiarize the results of others.

3. Legal differences. Plagiarism refers to the act of infringing the copyright of the other party, and to determine whether a work enjoys copyright, it is necessary to have a certain degree of originality and can be reproduced in a certain tangible form. To constitute plagiarism, there are generally two conditions:

The first is the principle of contact, and the second is substantial similarity. Borrowing is a case where the above two conditions are not met.

In the confirmation of plagiarism, it is often necessary to distinguish it from the slag that is similar in form

1）.Plagiarism and exploitation of ideas, ideas, and opinions in copyrighted works. Generally speaking, the author's freedom to use the themes, themes, opinions, ideas, etc. reflected in another work to create new creations is legally permissible and cannot be considered plagiarism.

2）.Plagiarism and use of other people's works historical background, objective facts, statistics, etc. The copyright laws of various countries do not protect the historical background, objective facts and statistics expressed in the work, and anyone can use it freely.

However, completely copying the words of others describing objective facts and historical background may be found to be plagiarism.

3）.Plagiarism and fair use. Fair use is the legal basis for the author's exploitation of another person's work, and its scope is generally determined by the copyright laws of each country. Anything beyond the scope of fair use generally constitutes infringement, but it is not necessarily plagiarism.

4）.Plagiarism and coincidence. Copyright protects original works, not original works. If a similar work is created by the author completely independently, it cannot be considered plagiarism.

1. Plagiarism is to copy other people's articles and works privately as their own patience to publish; Borrowing is to compare it with other people's reputations or things in order to learn from each other's strengths or weaknesses or learn lessons. The difference is that the former is "transcribed according to the Chang Deficiency Sample", and the latter is "Reference Photo".

2. Plagiarism is a serious infringement of the copyright of others in the literary world, and it is also an act that is difficult to identify in the practice of copyright adjudication. Borrowing refers to the critical inheritance of excellent culture.

3. From a legal point of view, plagiarism infringement, like other infringements, needs to meet four elements: the act is illegal; There is an objective fact of damage; There is a causal relationship with the fact of damage; The perpetrator is at fault. The above conditions are not met.

Generally speaking, "borrowing" is to get some inspiration or routines from other people's works, and then synthesize your own ideas, so as to create better, in short, "learn from others' strengths to make up for your own shortcomings". "Plagiarism" is to carry the things created by others as they are, that is, to steal the fruits of others' labor, ignore the hard work of others, and directly transfer the content painstakingly managed by others into their own works. But sometimes the so-called borrowing is also a euphemism point of plagiarism, so it is difficult to distinguish the line between borrowing and plagiarism.

2."Plagiarism".In the traditional sense, plagiarism is an easy-to-understand word, that is, to carry the work of others as it is. It's not so much plagiarism as stealing.

Someone else creates an apple and moves the apple to their own bowl, which is plagiarism; Someone else planted rice, but he harvested it without saying a word, which is plagiarism; Someone else stands in a certain position and stands in a specific position themselves, which is plagiarism. Plagiarism is the wrong act of stealing someone else's heart.

3.It's hard to measure between "borrowing" and "plagiarism."In many cases, whether a work is borrowed or plagiarized is a controversial issue. To a certain extent, borrowing is also a certain degree of plagiarism of the works of predecessors, but later after their own processing, they become their own things.

It's like the Internet**, the appearance of various stalks must be original in the beginning, maybe one or two people develop according to this line of thought is plagiarism. But there were more people, and then it slowly developed into a style of writing, which had nothing to do with plagiarism at this time.

Borrowing is to summarize a small part of the opinions published in an article, and plagiarism is to write the opinions published in an article word for word into one's own work, and there is an essential difference between the two, plagiarism is against morality and copyright infringement.

Borrowing is to create an innovative creation based on someone else's work and then learning someone else's writing, while plagiarism is to directly copy someone else's things without making changes.