How do you prove that motion dwells in matter and not that matter comes from motion? 50

The landlord said that the thinking from the principle is objective idealism, which is not correct, from the definition, the principle is our conceptual thing, from the principle and then thinking about the world, it seems to be idealistic, but the important thing is that theoretically speaking, the principle or the law, itself is the basis or the root is the determining point of its nature, if the principle is based on objective matter, the law, its nature must also be objective. The fact that laws are objective has become evidence that we often think philosophically about problems; Realistically, you don't have to be hands-on to understand something, you always need some inherited truth or indirect experience.

Therefore, as long as we are reasonable and well-founded, we do not need to care about formal limitations.

How can it be objective idealism? No, if you think about it, you'll understand! Didn't you say that the principles you were born with came down from the sky?

It's reflected in your brain, and your brain isn't born with it! It's all kinds of things that are objectively reflected in your mind. You first know that everything is in everything, especially the principles that the objective laws are thinking about by your clever brain, think about it carefully!

Is it completely consistent with Marx's philosophy, think about it, think about it, you will definitely figure it out, I was also troubled, but now I really think about it. You'll definitely figure it out. I wish you to figure it out soon, and don't let the confusion bother you anymore!!

The way of thinking condensed by the laws of human thinking is the self-propulsion of the pure spirit, and is fixed in some fixed structure to form some kind of principle or rule.

Objective idealism is a worldview that is meaningless in isolation from the basic questions of philosophy (textbook of Marxist philosophical principles).

Therefore, any way of thinking is not idealism or materialism. There are essential differences between the world outlook and the laws of thinking, and they should not be confused.

If, as you said, "thinking is based on principles", isn't materialism a way of thinking, or that materialism contradicts itself?

All mental images are a reflection of the real material world, including the way of thinking, which is rooted in the knowledge and experience of human beings in real practice and gathered in the brain, and then makes some kind of "definite" thing, and this certain thing accumulates into a principle. Thus, both spiritual and material movements have matter as their original carrier, regardless of the degree to which human intelligence and spirit can process or elevate them.

Very simple! Motion is just a concept, it is not a physical existence, it is a concept created by man!

It was created to explain the change in the physical position of matter! Without matter, the concept of motion cannot exist!

Matter is a substantial being, so it can still exist even if it is detached from motion, or even from the concept of matter itself!

So movement dwells in matter! Matter does not dwell in motion!

At the beginning of the birth of the universe, there was matter, which is a bit of matter that is absolutely static, the mass is equal to the whole universe, but space is infinitely small, and time is equal to rest, so matter does not originate from motion! Because the original matter is stationary!

When we ask the most essential question of a philosophical question, we are not proving its correctness, because the correctness is not provable, we are only justifying it.

In fact, you know it from the meaning of the word. What is Sports? Movement is a verb and he lacks a subject. Whereas matter is a noun that can be established alone.

So motion without matter is inconceivable, but matter without motion is conceivable (although there is no matter at rest).

According to Zhou Yi Taiji's theory, there is born out of nothing, and your thesis itself is wrong. There are representative substances, and there are no representative movements. Matter and motion are one and the same, and they are just two different manifestations of energy.

Principle is the product of the processing and condensation of the active reflection of objective things by individual consciousness, or it is derived from reality, and the broad sense of reality is matter.

This is very simple, the ontology of motion is matter, without matter, there is no movement, so what do you think?

If you do want a source, I can't tell you, after all, I read books to understand, not just memorize.

I think that matter and motion are equivalent to each other. There is no primordial or secondary.

There is no movement without matter.

The vast majority of matter is in relative motion with each other, and until now no matter has been found to be stationary with respect to all other substances. Thus, rising to the height of philosophy leads to the conclusion that the motion of matter is absolute, and that rest is relative.

In this way, it can be understood that motion is the fundamental property and mode of existence of matter.

Motion is the fundamental property and mode of existence of matter, which can only exist in motion, and matter that is absolutely stationary and does not make any motion does not exist.

If the position of the judgment object has changed relative to the reference object, the object is in motion; Conversely, the object is at relative rest, and two objects moving at the same speed and in the same direction are at relative rest.

:(1) Dialectical materialism holds that matter is an objective reality that does not depend on human will, and motion is all changes and processes of all things.

2) Matter and motion are inseparable. This is manifested in the following: on the one hand, motion is the movement of matter, and movement is inseparable from matter.

Because matter is the subject and objective basis of all movement in the world, the movement that is conceived without the material subject will inevitably advocate the movement with consciousness as the main body, and eventually fall into idealism. Such as the movement of Hegel's "Absolute Idea". On the other hand, matter is a moving substance, and matter cannot do without motion.

Because motion is the form of existence and the fundamental property of all matter in the world, it is necessary to assume that matter without motion must assert that stillness is the essential property of matter, and eventually fall into metaphysics. Such as the European metaphysical materialist view of matter.

3) Dialectical materialism holds that motion is the fundamental property of matter, and that matter and motion are inseparable, essentially admitting the absoluteness of motion, but this does not mean completely denying the existence of stillness. On the contrary, dialectical materialism holds that there is a certain state of relative rest in absolute motion, but relative rest is not an essential property of matter, but a special state of absolute motion.

Objective reality is the fundamental property of matter, the common, general essence of matter, which is manifested through motion. Matter itself is known through the knowledge of its movement, which is the highest abstract philosophical category that encapsulates the general nature of all changes and processes, including those in nature, in human society, and in the human mind. Matter is in motion.

Matter is the bearer of motion, the real basis of all movement and development; Motion is the fundamental property inherent in matter, and it is the mode of existence of all forms of matter. Noisy search.

Matter and motion are inseparable. On the one hand, matter is a moving substance, and there is no matter that does not move. Motion is the fundamental property inherent in matter and the mode of existence of all forms of matter.

On the other hand, motion is the motion of matter, there is no motion without matter. Matter is the bearer of motion, the real basis of all movement and development, and the cause of movement also leaks from matter itself.

1) Movement is the mode of existence of matter, the process of change and development that marks all things and phenomena in the world, from the simple position of movement to the human mind.

2) Matter is a moving substance, and matter and motion are inseparable. Everything, whether it is a microscopic particle or a macrocosm of the universe, is in the midst of interconnection and interaction, and it is this interaction that causes the movement, change and development of things. Therefore, everything in the whole world is in a process of movement, change and development.

Metaphysical materialism denies or does not understand that motion is the fundamental property of matter, and believes that things are essentially immobile, and even if there is a change in motion, it is a shift in position or an increase or decrease in quantity under the action of external forces, and there will be no macro-biological changes.

3) Matter is the bearer of motion, and there is no movement in the world that is separated from matter. Although there are many forms of movement, there are low and high levels; There are simple and complex, but their bearers are all material. There is no movement in the world without material bearers.

If you don't think that a movement without material bearers will inevitably fall into idealism. Objective idealism, for example, sees movement as the movement of absolute ideas that exist independently; Subjective idealism only acknowledges the existence of sensations or self-consciousness, and movement is said to be the movement of sensations or consciousness.

Matter is the substance of motion Motion is the movement of matter, and matter is the bearer of motion.

But the law is material and does not change with the change of human consciousness. So the law is material. (Here are the more obvious mistakes, nothing else).

Apples, bananas, cherries are fruits. And then the fruit itself does not exist.

All we can say is that this watermelon is a fruit. This thing is a fruit. But it is never possible to find out the fruit itself.

Because fruit is not a substance. He is something of a spiritual nature. I can't talk about the relationship between spirit and matter.

But your problem is solved. Laws are not substances. That's something else that exists.

You can't be deceived just because it's literally similar, and you have to keep in mind the difference between the two.

But motion is absolute, there is no matter that is separated from motion, but the law is eternal and unchanging, so the law is always static. This is contradictory.