Please help me analyze these two cameras

Updated on number 2024-05-13
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The difference between the two cameras (I won't write about the same).

    Canon Nikon.

    Effective pixels: 10,100,000,16,020,000 (Nikonsheng), optical zoom 12x, 18x (Nikonsheng).

    There are many opinions about the digic 5 Expeed 2, some say that the Nikon is better at processing speed, but I've always felt that the Canon's processing feels more feminine).

    Pixels and types 100000 pixel LCD screen 10000 pixel LCD screen (Nikonsheng) Product weight 135g (body only), 155g (including battery and memory card) 209g (including battery and memory card) (Canon).

    Suggestion: Both can be bought, both are trustworthy brands, Canon's is more beautiful and user-friendly, but obviously Nikon is cheaper and stronger in terms of performance indicators, especially since it has an 18x zoom! If it were me, I would sell Nikon (I like the brand), and if a girl asked me, I would recommend her to buy Canon.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    If you can, it is recommended that you don't buy a card machine, a mirrorless bar, which is more practical and much better than a card machine.

    Sony NEX-5N set.

    Panasonic DMC-GX1 standalone.

    are all good choices.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    If you want to choose from this, I recommend choosing Canon.

    Both of these are new machines that have not been used by anyone, Canon's is a new processor, and Nikon's is an old one. Moreover, this CMOS is also new, why not use 1600W pixels instead of 1010, those who understand should know that this is an act that takes into account the image quality, that is, the same level of CMOS, the lower the pixels, the better the image quality is relatively speaking. Both are telephoto machines, with similar other parameters, fully automatic, and are very suitable for the general public.

    A little advice.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Canon S95 Large CCD 1 Images are clear. Pretty good card machine.

    **Reference**. At.

    flickr to see more parameter samples.

    canon s95

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The sensor of the ZS7 is 1, which is too small and not cost-effective.

    The WX5 uses a back-illuminated sensor, which is very good in terms of focusing speed, noise control in low-light environments, and handheld night mode. Now it has begun to distribute goods, **1800 or so, which is much more cost-effective than ZS7.

    The F305 is very strong in terms of parameters, but it doesn't seem to be on the shelves yet, so there is no sample evaluation at the moment, so it's hard to say.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The three cameras you choose are all good, but unfortunately they are not traditional camera manufacturers, and the cameras produced by traditional manufacturers have considerable skills in imaging quality, light metering elements and metering methods. In addition, it is possible to produce lens products with high standards. They are, in order; Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Pantex, Minolta (now said to have Sony trademarks after being acquired by Sony).

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    This doesn't have to be tangled, definitely Fujifilm F305 is the best!

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Panasonic's anti-shake is the best in the industry, the card machine is not recommended to consider the Canon brand, you should know that its advertisements are flying all over the sky, and it is a SLR machine, and cards are not its main business; Sony's battery life is very poor, and the fuselage is small and fashionable, but God will definitely close another door for you when he opens a door for you, which means you should understand; Fuji's cost performance is very high, but**That jitter is quite powerful, and electronic anti-shake is fooling; Nikon's, if you're not panicking about burning money, you can buy it and experience what garbage is.

    I suggest you consider Panasonic FH1, which is very good, about 1000 yuan, and 12 million pixels. It doesn't matter, the lenses of the card machine are 1 larger than this, the sacrifice is quality if the pixel is high, the key to choosing a camera is to look at the lens rather than the pixel, that is all fooling people, the average household 8 million can be washed out very good**, do you want such a big ** to make advertising posters? It is recommended not to pursue high pixels, useless.

    Panasonic's cards have always been the boss in Japan, but they are very low-key and have no ads, so they are extremely cost-effective. You can take a look at this FH1 in Zhongguancun, and you will know that Panasonic's stuff is really good after using it.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    If I were you,I have 1500 pieces, I will choose SonyW390,14 million pixels,Optical image stabilization,Can meet the requirements,The maximum aperture is much better than the adaptability of the general card machine in the dark; There is also a panorama scanning function, which is very practical and fun.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Panasonic's ZS5GK, Leica lens, 8x zoom, good results.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    If you think the G11 is too thick, we recommend the Canon IXUS 210 and Canon SX210 IS.

Related questions
19 answers2024-05-13

Since you love, don't give up, wait for the day he will be moved! In short, don't let yourself regret not loving! >>>More

10 answers2024-05-13

1.The two-and-a-half results were positive for hepatitis B virus core antibody and surface antibody, indicating that they had been vaccinated against hepatitis B or hepatitis B virus infection and had immunity. Your second positive indicates that you have hepatitis B virus antibodies, the core antibodies may gradually turn negative over time, or they may be carried for life, you can quantitatively test the titer of surface antibodies, if you < 10 miu ml, a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine. >>>More

3 answers2024-05-13

Hehe, roughly meaning:

**Weather for the day ahead. >>>More

7 answers2024-05-13

Magotan has only opened, C5 has been driven, feel free to say some feelings, brother, refer to it yourself. >>>More

33 answers2024-05-13

As far as the description is concerned, it is recommended to describe the problem clearly. **Blurry, it is recommended to dare to take close shots. >>>More