Judgment Expository Questions Philosophy is an impractical piece of knowledge, and as such, it is us

Mortimer. j.Adler in How to Read a Book.

Argumentative books are divided into theoretical and practical types, and philosophy, history, and science are divided into theoretical types.

Unlike the pragmatic type, philosophy as a theoretical type seems to be less "practical", but not being "practical" does not mean that it is useless.

The book explains the differences and connections between theoretical and practical books

Theory is concerned with understanding or understanding something, focusing on the knowledge itself; Practicality is related to a certain effective practice, whether it is immediate or long-term, they are concerned with what knowledge can help solve the problems of life, and they also pass on knowledge, but always with a view that emphasizes the practical application of knowledge;

Therefore, it can be considered that theory is the precursor to practicality.

For example, science and technology, one emphasizes theory and the other emphasizes practicality, but is science that represents theory useless?

There is no necessary connection between the practical and the useless. Furthermore, the so-called "impractical" is probably only because you have not yet discovered or recognized its practical value.

Wrong, philosophy does not directly act on things, its role is to change the way people think.

Wrong. Philosophy is a practical knowledge. Theory can guide practice, and philosophy can provide theoretical guidance for our modernization drive.

Philosophy, unlike religion, belongs to the category of theory and has the role of guiding practice.

Summary. Hello, philosophy is about the generalization and summary of natural knowledge, social knowledge and thinking knowledge, the study of the most general laws in the field of nature, society and thinking, and the study of the specific laws of a certain field or a part of the objective world, many people have some mistakes in philosophy.

Hello, philosophy is the summary and summary of natural knowledge, social knowledge and thinking knowledge, the study of the most general laws in the fields of nature, society and thinking, and the study of the special laws of a certain field or a certain part of the objective world.

Philosophy is a kind of knowledge that produces knowledge, and this is wrong.

Why is it wrong because it doesn't produce knowledge or because it's not knowledge.

He is the summation of knowledge.

CD The objectivity of truth has two implications: first, the content of truth is objective, and second, the only standard practice to test truth is objective.

aSaying that truth is objective reality. Let's look at the definition of truth, which is the correct reflection of the nature and laws of objective things. That is to say, truth is a reflection of cognition rather than objective reality, which is a property of matter.

b Saying that truth is a law. If we look at the definition of law, law is the necessary and stable connection of the essence inherent in the process of the movement of things. Laws are connections, while truth is reflections, and the two cannot be confused.

The answers to c and d are all in the book.

All truths are objective and contain two meanings: first, truth contains objective content that is not subject to human will; Second, the criterion for testing truth is objective social practice;

A False, truth is a philosophical category that corresponds to subjectivity and objectivity, as long as the knowledge that correctly reflects the thing itself is the truth, the full name of truth is the knowledge of truth, and knowledge is the category of consciousness, which is objectively imaginary, not material, and is objective reality.

bFalse, truth is different from law, law is the inevitable, stable, intrinsic, essential connection between things. In other words, phenomena are not laws, but the understanding that correctly reflects phenomena is the truth. Such as:

The sun rises in the east and sets in the west. (It is the truth, but it is not a law because it is a phenomenon).

c Yes, the knowledge of truth, the content of which is objective, (there is an archetype in life), and the form is subjective and changeable.

D Yes, the only criterion for testing truth is practical activity, which is also objective, not subjective.

All 4 are right!

It should be added that it is true that truth is objective, but truth is also subjective!! Most of the philosophies in human history are the result of the subjective world of philosophers, and as long as they express correct laws and spiritual existence, they can be called truth!!

The answer is c and d; A objective reality refers to matter, truth is people's correct reflection of objective things and their laws, the content comes from objectivity, but the form is subjective and belongs to the category of cognition, so A and B cannot be chosen.

Answer] :d According to the difference in the second aspect of the basic questions of philosophy, philosophy can be divided into agnosticism and agnosticism. Agnosticism holds that the world can be known, and that thinking and being have the same nature as Zen Maeano

Agnosticism holds that the world cannot be known or fully known, and denies the identity of thought and being. Therefore, the correct answer to this question is d.

Original question: The following statements about the basic problems of philosophy are correct (b, d) a, and the basic problems of philosophy are the questions of what is the origin of thinking and being, or matter and consciousness.

b. The basic problems of philosophy run through the development of philosophy and are questions that cannot be avoided by philosophers.

d. The basic problems of philosophy are not only the premise and basis for solving all other philosophical problems, but also the basic problems of people's practical life.

e. The difference in the basic question of "whether thinking can reflect existence" constitutes the two basic schools of philosophy.

Material 1 Descartes's view that Marxist philosophy is dualism, that is, it cannot explain who comes first and who comes after the spirit, and Descartes's philosophical school is thus idealism (called "rationalist epistemology" in the history of Western philosophy) with reference to Marxist philosophyHegel's point of view is that the reason why people can understand matter is because of human thinking, so reasoning that spirit precedes matter is typical idealist monism, so Hegel's philosophical school is idealism under the reference of Marxist philosophy.

Material 2 is naïve materialism. Both are the same, believing that the origin of the world is something like water or fire.

Material 3 is dialectical materialism. The content and meaning of the celebration can be seen everywhere on the Internet, which is the content and significance of materialist dialectics in Marxist philosophy. That's a lot or too little.

However, in the critique of materials 1 and 2, we can briefly talk about the themes that revolve around the themes of matter and spirit, how unreasonable idealism is, and so on.

Note: What I have said above is only for some ordinary lovers or advocates of Marx's philosophy, and for the philosophy of Descartes and Hegel, the logic is strictly unassailable, and if there is anything bad about their philosophy, it can only be said to be outdated.

a.What is the primacy of thinking and being?

b.Can thinking produce theories.

c.Whether there is an identity between thinking and being.

d.Whether the mind can correctly reflect existence.

Parse. In the first step, this question tests philosophical knowledge.

The second step, item a: What is the primacy of matter and consciousness is the basis and fundamental starting point for the establishment of the theoretical system of all philosophy, which stipulates the basic nature of philosophy and the basic direction for solving all philosophical problems. Therefore, Engels took the difference between thinking and existence as the only criterion for dividing the two basic philosophical schools of thought and idealism.

Item A is in line with the title and is elected.

Item C: The question of whether thinking and existence are identical, that is, whether the world can be known by people and whether people's thinking can correctly reflect the real world, belongs to the basic questions of philosophy. This belongs to the scope of epistemology in the history of philosophy, which deals with the nature of knowledge, the possibility of knowledge and its realization, etc., so that philosophy can be divided into two basic views: "knowability" and "agnosticism".

Item c is in line with the title and is elected.

Expand. Item B: Whether thinking can produce theories is not the basis of the fundamental question of philosophy. Item B error, exclude.

Item D: Whether thinking can correctly reflect existence is not the basic problem of philosophy, but the concretization of the basic problem of philosophy. Item D error, exclude.

Test Centers. Politics.

Marxist philosophy.

Philosophical Overview.