Is it possible to produce meat analogues from the indefinite proliferation of cancer cells from catt

Cancer cells can indeed proliferate indefinitely, and the most famous cancer cell line, the HeLa cell line, which is currently cultured, is basically equivalent to immortality. But when you eat meat, you will eat the taste, taste and nutrition of the meat. And both the mouthfeel and the taste actually require highly differentiated cells to provide.

For example, beef tenderloin and beef brisket are not the same texture at all, and the dishes made are not the same taste, not to mention a bunch of slippery cancer cells, which are not delicious no matter how you think about it. In terms of nutrition, various vitamins and trace elements other than the three major nutrients also need to be synthesized and enriched by highly differentiated cells。So cancer cells don't provide the satisfaction and nutritional needs of eating meat.

Cancer cells multiply indefinitely, and indefinite proliferation does not mean that an infinite number of cancer cells appear out of thin air. Cell proliferation itself requires nutrient inputs, regardless of whether these cells are cultured in vitro or in animals. The subject needs to get 500g of edible cells, so he needs to put in the corresponding nutrients, just like raising pigs and feeding feed.

Obviously, it is more economical to raise pigs for feed.

Most of the cancer cells have strong anaerobic metabolism, coupled with the lack of pipelines to transport metabolic wastes, the taste may be sour, and there is a putrid taste. What's more, the meat we usually eat contains a variety of different tissues, such as muscle, fat, connective tissue, etc., and the ratio of these different tissues produces the taste of meat.

Cancer cells are very, very delicate. It has to be kept in a constant temperature, constant humidity, and super clean place, which is one of the reasons why many anti-cancer drugs that are not good in vitro experiments are not used for body hair.

The above two items determine that cultivating cancer cells is an extremely expensive thingGiven that human beings have no long history of eating cancer cells, and traditional medicine has not mentioned the health care and health effects of cancer cells at all, such an expensive and unpalatable thing should not be sold. So most of this idea is not feasible.

No way. The production of artificial meat from cow cancer cells does not do any good to the human body if eaten and the Food Supervision Bureau will not pass the audit.

In vitro culture of cancer cells requires a very harsh environment, and the production cost will be quite high to achieve enough for the whole human consumption. Besides, if you cultivate cancer cells from cattle to make artificial meat, won't you feel unappetizing when you eat them? It's better to raise cattle.

This should not be advisable, after all, the harm is also relatively large.

At least the current technology can't do it, after all, there are still a lot of bad things about artificial meat.

No, the beef made in this way is not good for the human body, so you can't do it.

Maybe you can, but it's something that can be considered at a certain stage of scientific development.

I don't think so. First of all, there are significant security risks associated with this technology.

With the current technology, it should be impossible, and there are many flaws in the cold.

I don't think so, I don't know if the meat produced by the infinite proliferation of cow cancer cells will be harmful to the human body.

There is no harm in soy artificial meat.

1. There are two kinds of artificial meat, one of which is artificial meat, also known as soy protein meat, which is actually a soy product that imitates the shape and taste of meat. Meat analogues are mainly made from soy protein because it is rich in a lot of protein and a small amount of fat.

2. The other is artificial meat made from animal stem cells. Researchers "feed" stem cells with sugars, amino acids, oils, minerals, and a variety of nutrients to keep them "growing."

In the long run, after solving the problem of being full, consumers will pay more attention to their health. Artificial meat contains higher protein and lower fat, and is a good protein** food. With people's attention to nutrition and health, vegetarian plant-based meat has a certain market base and consumer groups.

However, the reality is that until now, no meat analogue has been mass-produced and approved to enter the market, let alone be put on the table.

But whether it is from the level of production technology, or from the perspective of meat nutrition, taste and quality, artificial meat is still not a short distance from really going to the table of thousands of households. At present, many people are unacceptable, and there is indeed a long way to go for this to go to the public.

It is very likely that artificial meat contains higher protein and lower fat, and is a good protein** food.

None of the meat analogues have been mass-produced and approved for the market.

There is a high probability that artificial meat is high in nutrients.

There is no meat analogue that can be mass-produced.

Very likely, because neither farming is used.

I don't think so.

I don't think it's possible to replace natural meat.

Artificial meat should be a good alternative.

African swine fever has greatly affected the domestic pig production capacity and consumption psychology, and how to make up for the pork gap in the later stage and the research and development of pork substitutes have also received widespread attention.

The reporter said in an interview that artificial meat is only a statement that is convenient for the public to understand, and it should be clearly stated on the food label and ingredient list that it is artificial meat.

Eating doesn't make much of a difference. There are two types of artificial meat and pork artificial meat, the first is processed from soybean and other plant proteins, just like "vegetarian meat". No, if artificial meat becomes a substitute for pork in the future, then there will be more meat in the future.

I think it's probably possible, but it's going to take a long time, and it's not good.

Because it's a trend, a trend.

From a health point of view, the current artificial meat burger has 15% less fat and 90% less cholesterol than a beef burger. Therefore, artificial meat has always been an important technology in the food field. Let's take a look at the human exploration of artificial meat burger technology.

In 2013, the world's first artificial meat burger appeared. At the press conference, this artificial meat burger was eaten on the spot. The person who funded the study was Google co-founder Sergey Brin.

The cost of making this burger is as high as 330,000 US dollars, or more than 2 million yuan. The principle of this technique is to take a small amount of cells from an animal, then grow them in a laboratory, nourish them with a special nutrient solution, and allow them to produce muscle tissue.

To put it simply, it is to let animal cells grow directly into meat in the laboratory.

However, both companies that are leading the way in the field of analogue meat today have adopted new technologies. The names of the two companies are "Impossible Foods" and "Beyond Meat", which literally translates to "Impossible Food", or IF, and "Beyond Meat", which is abbreviated as BM. Among them, iF has received investment from big names including Google, Bill Gates and Li Ka-shing.

At present, the product has been sold in more than 5,000 restaurants.

The new technology is no longer to produce meat by growing cells in the laboratory, but to produce meat on a plant-based basis. IF uses heme produced by genetically modified yeast to make artificial meat burgers. Heme can give the meat its color and taste.

BM uses pea protein to make ground beef. BM's products are available in chains including Whole Foods in the United States. The artificial meat needed to make the burger is just minced meat.

So artificial meat is being produced all over the world.

What's new.

The American magazine "Science" recently said that laboratory-grown "artificial meat" will soon appear on the dining table of Americans. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said they would jointly oversee the production of the meat so that it could be safely delivered to consumers across the country.

What is Artificial Meat?

A small piece of muscle tissue can grow 10,000 kilograms of meat.

In the Netherlands, Mark Post, a professor of physiology at Maastricht University, is working to grow edible meat in the lab, an innovative technology that could revolutionize the table. And the first step to start this revolution is only a small piece of meat, small enough to be extracted from a living animal.

Artificial beef patties are similar to normal meat and have a milder texture.

In 2013, Post presented his first "artificial beef patty" to the world. Artificial beef patties are lighter in color and lighter in flavor than normal beef patties. But Post points out that the milder flavor of the faux patty comes in exchange for a more efficient protein production.

Artificial meat benefits:

It can "reduce the burden" for the earth and save soil, water and other resources.

However, from a broader perspective, the issue of "artificial meat" is related to the future of humanity and even the planet. Scientists expect the world's population to reach 9.6 billion by 2050. If humans continue to eat meat as they do now, they will consume excessive amounts of natural resources such as land and water, while also exacerbating climate change and species extinction.

Water is a resource that is consumed in large quantities during the production of meat. 3,300 litres of water are needed for every kilogram of eggs produced; 3,900 litres of water are needed to produce one kilogram of chicken; 4,800 litres of water are needed for every kilogram of pork produced; Up to 5,000 litres of water are required to produce one kilogram of cheese; The most surprising thing is that 15,500 litres of water are needed for every kilogram of beef produced.

While consuming the earth's resources such as land and water, animal farming and meat production also produce large amounts of greenhouse gases.

Studies have shown that the CO2 emissions from producing one kilogram of beef are roughly equivalent to those of an economy car driving 100 km. The CO2 produced by one kilogram of pork or poultry meat is equivalent to the emissions of a car driving about 50 kilometers.

In contrast, lab-grown meat is more environmentally friendly and economical. Compared to raising, slaughtering, and processing a beef patty, making an artificial beef patty in the laboratory can save 99% of water, 93% of land, 90% of greenhouse gas emissions, and 46% of energy consumption.

Factory farm farming has severely devastated animal growth.

Since the 60s of the last century, industrialized countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom have begun to industrialize animal breeding. In the United States, more than 95% of meat comes from factory farms, where the environment is not suitable for animal growth.

Animal welfare, resource pressure, climate change, human health, all these factors have led to the development of artificial meat. At present, there are a number of companies in various countries that are working on the development of artificial meat.

Recently, the concept of artificial meat has become popular all over the world, and the concept of "artificial meat" has been born, and crazy "fake meat" is impacting the traditional pork market.

Recently, the global artificial meat giant Beyond Meat was listed on the U.S. stock market, soaring 163% in a single day, breaking a number of IPO records, and the artificial meat boom swept Wall Street. The popularity of artificial meat seems to have been foreshadowed, Burger King has announced on April Fool's Day that it will try to sell artificial meat burgers in many stores in the United States, and it didn't take long for Nestle to announce plans to produce artificial meat burgers.

Overnight, the consumption of new species of artificial meat has become the darling of the global capital market, completely detonating the entire agriculture and animal husbandry sector. In fact, artificial meat is not as tall as we imagined, on the contrary, it is a very ordinary soybean products, artificial meat is mainly divided into vegetarian meat and cultured meat, vegetarian meat is a plant protein as raw material imitation of meat, such as vegetarian chicken commonly eaten in Guangdong, and the practice of cultivated meat is more advanced, with animal cells to proliferate muscle fibers, the taste is also closest to the original meat, the only deficiency is that the technology is not mature, the cost is high, and the price of the finished product is also expensive.

In developed countries in Europe and the United States, people prefer steaks, hamburgers, chicken thighs and other high-calorie staple foods, KFC, McDonald's, the two major FMCG chain giants, consume tens of thousands of meat raw materials every day, but in order to obtain these raw materials, it is necessary to occupy a large amount of arable land to raise livestock, consume more energy, coupled with the surge in the global population, which means that more meat needs to be consumed, leading to a vicious circle.

In order to speed up the slaughter rate of livestock, so that the meat is full, people do not hesitate to add a variety of growth hormones to the feed, and the high blood pressure of carnivorists, the prevalence of fatty liver is much higher than that of qualitative people, artificial meat can not only meet the daily dietary needs of carnivores, but also does not contain various additives, growth hormones, etc., and eats environmentally friendly and healthy.

The biggest benefit of artificial meat is to be able to resist systemic risks in the meat market, the recent African swine fever has led to a surge in pigs, resulting in a large consumption gap, for consumers, either spend more money to buy ** meat, or eat less meat, if artificial meat can replace part of the pork in the future, then without increasing the burden of land and resources, we can still meet the existing human meat consumption needs.

There are several main reasons:

1 Market pressure - Vegetarians are on the rise.

According to Euromonitor, veganism is increasing globally, with the corresponding global meat substitute market growing by 22% in 2018 and 18% in 2017, and in Australia and Canada, more than half of adults surveyed said they are reducing their intake of red meat (meat from mammals such as pork and beef).

According to a survey by Mintel's consumer analysts, 40% of UK respondents believe that "I eat less meat now than I used to"; Among young people aged 18-24, 28% of respondents believe that "by 2025, my diet will probably be largely meat-free".

2 Environmental pressure - greenhouse gas emissions.

Beyond Meat CEO Ethan Brown started the company with the environment in mind, with at least 23% of greenhouse gases coming from meat production, according to Johns Hopkins University, and cow farts (yes, you read that right) account for 41% of global methane emissions, which is a major component of greenhouse gases. In other words, "artificial meat" also contributes to a large extent to the suppression of climate change.

3 Resource Pressures - Population growth and limited resources.

"Artificial meat" can also solve the contradiction between population growth and resource consumption.

According to United Nations statistics, 60% of the world's food crops are currently used to raise livestock – that is, pigs, sheep, cattle, etc. Taking beef as an example, the production of 1kg of beef requires the consumption of 7kg of staple food, and the production of 1 kg of staple food requires 1000kg of clean water, so theoretically the production of 1kg of beef needs to consume more than 7000kg of clean water.

In addition, according to Clark & Tilman's 2017 statistics, the area of land required to produce each gram of protein in beef and lamb is square meters, which is far more than other food types.

It is estimated that by 2050, only 3 billion to 4 billion people will be able to be fed by a meat-heavy diet, and 9.5-10 billion people can be fed by a plant-heavy diet. According to the official projections of the United Nations, the earth will welcome 10 billion people by 2050.

Therefore, if "artificial meat" replaces intensive agriculture as the industry standard, it will have a great positive effect on environmental protection. And theoretically, meat produced only from plants will also be cheaper than "real meat" after the technology and production capacity are improved.

4 Food Safety - Lab Clean Culture.

Raising animals is a "dangerous" thing, especially in some countries and regions where industrial farming has not been popularized, farmers may suffer from zoonotic diseases such as swine Japanese encephalitis and filariasis. In addition, the misuse of antibiotics in animals by farmers is also invisibly increasing the resistance of the virus, which may lead to the birth of "super viruses", and meat consumers may also suffer from foodborne diseases.

However, "artificial meat", especially "cultivated meat" in the laboratory, is absolutely safe and clean during the production process because it does not come into contact with external pollution sources.