The Two Sides of War 20, The Two Sides of War

No matter what, it's all good and good!

War can be reborn or perish!

Look at what kind of war it is, if you use nuclear **, it will definitely hinder development, damn it, let alone development,,, the ecological environment has been destroyed, and it cannot be regenerated, if it is a cold war, then the countries will compete. It is in the development of the strength of various countries

Categories: Society, Culture, >> Military.

Problem description: Some people say that war is like two sides of the same coin, on the one hand, it promotes the development of science and technology, and on the other hand, it hinders the progress of society. Do you agree with this idea?

Analysis: As soon as the cannon sounds, **10,000 taels, war will only promote social progress, and it will not be the opposite, throughout the ages, any great social change will eventually be completed by a decisive war, otherwise, what means do people with awakened ideas rely on to overthrow slave owners and feudal rulers?

It has brought great changes to the wisdom of friends, but also brought disasters to people.

The country is best at making war money in war. The country's economy was damaged.

On the one hand, war promoted the development of science and technology, and on the other hand, hindered the progress of society.

As soon as the cannon sounded, ** ten thousand taels, war will only promote social progress, not the opposite, throughout the ages, any great social change, in the end, is completed by a decisive war, otherwise, what means do people with awakened ideas rely on to overthrow slave owners and feudal rulers?

It has brought great change and disaster to people.

The United States is best at making war money in war. The country's economy was damaged, and you didn't give much points, so. That's pretty much for you.

There is a problem with this topic.,The opposing side can't play.,It's recommended to modify the next topic.,Change it to the pros and cons more reluctantly and you can still fight.,This kind of problem is naturally proven.,The positive side only needs to prove that the war has an advantage.,The opposing side loses.,Serious bug.

Benefits: War is the most effective way to advance civilizations.

War will rapidly promote the development of human science and technology, and almost every scientific and technological revolution is related to war.

Computers, nuclear technology, rocket and space technology, the greatest technologies of mankind today, are all products of World War II.

War not only promotes the development of human science and technology, but also promotes the political, economic, and cultural development of mankind.

War will wipe out the decaying civilization that has fallen behind; So that the excellent civilization gets more resources. Only an excellent civilization can make better use of resources and develop a more advanced civilization, and the survival of the fittest will promote the political, economic, and cultural progress of mankind.

For example, the Europeans invaded North America and destroyed the backward and primitive civilization there, and established an advanced civilization like the United States. This is definitely progress for the entire process of human civilization.

For human civilization to make rapid progress, war is necessary, but peacetime is also indispensable, and peacetime is a period of preparation for war. The wealth accumulated in peacetime will make war better for human progress.

If peace is a period of quantitative change in human progress, then war is a qualitative change in human progress.

This kind of debate is purely an egg pain, nonsense can't solve the problem, no matter which side is non-dialectical, for the sake of face to fight for red-faced, the baby who came out of this question is wooden.

Benefits: You can make huge profits, rapidly develop national strength, and become a hegemon

Disadvantage: Once it fails, the family is ruined

The two sides of war are nothing more than losing and winning.

Winning the war, opening up the territory and making contributions.

If you lose, you will cede the land and pay compensation, and you will be humiliated and sued for peace.

It's like the Opium Wars. Britain fought China, Britain won, and China ceded land and paid reparations. What happens if Britain loses?

It is estimated that the Chinese fleet is approaching the English Channel. In fact, the most typical should be Germany during World War I, Germany launched World War I and was defeated. Forced to sign the extremely humiliating Treaty of Versailles, the negativity of the war came to the fore.

After the First World War, Germany faced almost an entire national existential crisis.

Therefore, the launch of a war depends on strength. Strength combined with wisdom will develop on the good side, otherwise it will be the opposite. This is the two-sided nature of war.

War is like two sides of the same coin, on the one hand, it promotes the development of science and technology, and on the other hand, it hinders the progress of society.

There is some truth to this statement.

In times of war, in order to meet the needs of operations, many countries did not hesitate to concentrate large amounts of manpower, material, and financial resources to conduct military scientific research. Many of the products we use today were originally used in the military: electronic computers (used to calculate ballistics in World War II), launch vehicles, nuclear energy (atomic bombs), and so on.

In a sense, war does promote the development of science and technology.

However, it must be emphasized that the destructiveness of war far outweighs its constructiveness, and its negative impact is even more serious. If the wealth consumed by all the wars in the history of mankind is accumulated, it is enough for everyone in modern times to live a happy life. The scientific and technological advances brought about by the war were only a by-product.

Therefore, this statement cannot be used as a justification for war.

Agree that because war can indeed promote the development of science and technology, it prompts people to develop new and more advanced technologies, so that they can win victories and work harder to engage in scientific research, which can speed up the development of science and technology, because no country wants to lag behind other countries At the same time, war will also bring destruction, many people may be displaced, and there is no place to live or eat, so who will pay attention to the development of society, and if a country focuses on war, Then you won't care about the development of other undertakings in this country, and the society may be unstable, just like some Middle Eastern countries and African countries that often fight wars, just like that, there will be a lot of unstable factors, then, of course, it will hinder social progress, so war has two sides, in fact, there are many things in the world that have two sides.

Many things exist in contradiction, just like people, they are also a unity of contradictions.

Agreed. Because war itself has two sides, there is a good side and a bad side, and the good promotes the development of society....(The answer is in the question).

I agree! There are two sides to everything. I suggest you take a look at the Naruto update that has just been updated. You can know better.