Does Meidu Property Company have the right to sue us?

Personally, I don't think the management company can win the lawsuit.

1. First of all, the owner checks whether the property management company has management qualifications when managing the community, and if there is no owner, he can not pay the property management fee.

2. The owner pays the property management fee according to the contract, so whether the agreement signed by the property management company and the community owners' committee is valid. Judging from the situation introduced by the landlord, it is obviously invalid. The owners' committee is only an executive body of the owners' general meeting, and cannot replace the owners' general meeting to make decisions, so the decisions made are also invalid.

A qualified strata company should know that this situation is invalid. Now that it is known that the contract is still signed, there is obviously a suspicion of fraud. In addition, since there is an agreement in a written contract, it is debatable whether there is a de facto contract.

3. Even if the contract is "valid", as stated on the first floor, the first property management company to subcontract the property as a whole is a violation of the "Property Management Regulations", and the contract that violates national laws and regulations should obviously not be supported by the court.

Therefore, the court should not support the lawsuit filed by Meidu Property Management Company. Of course, the specific results also depend on some specific problems, and the above is just based on the description of the landlord, which may be a little biased, for reference only.

1. If you do not pay the property management fee, no matter whether the existence of Meidu is reasonable or not, it is a fact that they provide services for you, and the services provided by the property management company are a whole, not because individual people do not enjoy them, or because they are not satisfied with the service, the owner does not pay the property management fee.

2. As mentioned in the property management regulations, the property management company can subcontract certain items of the community, but not all of them. It's not the right thing to do.

3. Regardless of whether the United States is a community that is taken over through the nature of subcontracting, as long as an agreement is signed with the property committee, it is legal. If there is no contract, Meidu Property Management Company has no right and obligation to provide services to you.

When you know that you have not signed a contract agreement with the United States, the property management committee does not take corresponding measures, therefore, the property management company provides services to you, and if you do not pay the property management fees, the United States has the right to sue.

1.You can sue the property management company for unilateral repudiation.

2.Mido Property Management has no right to sue you. Because you owners have no agreement with him.

3.Is the owners' committee elected by the owners and has the right to represent the owners? This is the crux of the matter.

The property is not entitled to a fine because it is not a **department.

Unless it reports your illegal demolition of the wall to the Construction Authority.

In your case, you don't need to dismantle the load-bearing wall, just go to the local construction bureau to file a case, and after the normal procedures are taken, you don't have to take care of the property.

Fines you 3000 and you give them the money, I don't think they dare to take it, if you really take the money, you sue them.

I also do property.

If your electricity bill is not collected by the property management company, the property management company will definitely not be able to cut off your electricity. You can complain to the electricity administration and let them solve the problem for you. Also, if you don't owe electricity bills and the utility company wants to cut off your electricity for any other reason, it's illegal.

For example, if you are to the electricity supply bureau. Then the property has no right to shut off your electricity!

Most of them are paid by the property now, so they can listen to your electricity.

The administrative department in charge of property management - the Housing Authority, of course, the property company is actually afraid of any administrative department, the Health Bureau, the City Appearance Bureau, the Taxation Bureau, etc., just to see if their work is done well, they are not afraid of checking!

The property management company does not have the power to forcibly turn off the electricity in the customer's home.

The parties to the power supply contract are the owner and the power supply company; The parties to the property management contract are the owner and the property management company, and the two are different legal relationships. The right of power outage is an important right of defense for the performance of the contract of the water supply and power supply enterprise, and the property management company is not the power supply person in the community, so it naturally does not enjoy the right to supply water and electricity.

In the property management contract, it is agreed that in the case of the owner's arrears, the property management company can take the water and power outage as a means of punishment, which belongs to the contract law to set up other contract clauses, according to the law, such clauses should obtain the consent of the right holder, otherwise, it is an invalid clause, and the owner can pursue the property management company's tort damages liability.

It is recommended that you consult the property contract first.

The contract spells out how the property will not fulfill its duties.

Any problems must be resolved through negotiation.

Although the property company does not have the right to cut off the power, it is a breach of contract if you unilaterally refuse to pay.

Jian Xuan Cong called on the owners who had not paid the fees to discuss the Zheng judgment with the property.

1.The property does not have the right to cut off water and electricity, and the hydropower facilities belong to public facilities, and the ownership does not belong to the property.

2. If the service quality is not good, you can coordinate with the property through the owners' committee, either to improve the quality of service, or to reduce the property fee, and then you have to sue.

1. The property company provides property management, according to Article 2 of the "Property Management Regulations", the term "property management" in these regulations refers to the activities of the owner through the selection of property management enterprises, and the owners and property management enterprises in accordance with the property service contract to repair, maintain and manage the housing and supporting facilities and equipment and related sites, and maintain the environmental sanitation and order in the relevant areas.

Therefore, the property management company has the right not to use the elevator to transport the construction slag, and inform in advance before the renovation.

2. The property management company and the owner are in a contractual relationship. The property management company provides management and services for the owners of the community according to the contract.

3. The property management company is not a law enforcement department and has no right to impose fines on the owners. Take your case as an example, the property management company has signed a property management contract with you, and arranged the work according to the requirements of the regulations, and you have breached the contract, the 200 yuan cannot be called a fine, but can only be called: liquidated damages.

Upstairs is right, go sue them.

The strata company does not have the power to sue the landlord by fining them.

1. The property company is an intermediary service organization.

2. The contractual relationship between the property company and the owner is an equal subject.

3. It does not have the power to apply a fine system to property owners.