In the tangle of buying Panasonic LX3 or Canon D3000 set...

Such a state should consider your choice in the future (that is, whether you want to invest in the bottomless pit of equipment) Two suggestions: Pullover: The future is not very optimistic, after all, the depreciation of the fuselage is always faster than the lens, but the pullover is not suitable for the future.

PS: If you are on a DSLR, it is recommended to use a better lens. Get ready for an upgrade. (Don't blame me for burning it).

There is a manual function, so there is no problem with hand practice. After all, it can also be used as a standby for SLR in the future.

1. D3000 is cost-effective, but it cannot be said that D3000 is the most suitable for you.

2. The D3000 sleeve is very, very, very practical. As for whether it is enough, LX3 is not enough to cover the head, LX3 is enough, and the head is basically enough.

3. LX3 should not be too price-reduced.

As for which one to choose, it varies from person to person.

The D3000 does work better than the LX3:

1. The details are better, and you can shoot more clearly (use the software to adjust it, and the gap will come out).

2. Slightly better low-light shooting, 3. Much better playability, and you can also play telephoto with a lens, such as time control.

4. The handling is much stronger, including the time taken to adjust the parameters, standby time (you can open it all day and shoot when you see it), battery life (you can shoot 600 photos without changing the battery), feel, stability of anti-shake (because it is more stable because it is close to the face), etc.

But there are also quite a few flaws than the lx3:

1. White balance is not accurate, especially at night and indoors. The camera can be adjusted, but not fine-tuned.

2. Bigger, less portable, but not tired to hang around the neck.

3. There is no camera function.

4. Some functions are missing, such as: bracketing**, panoramic shooting.

There is no perfect machine, and in my opinion, if you don't care about volume and weight, buy the D3000. There will be interest in buying a DSLR license, and a small camera is a small camera after all.

The LX3 I bought seven months ago was only 3300RMB, why is it still so expensive?

If D3000 is really similar to LX3**, of course, D3000 is cost-effective, LX3 is positioned as "quasi-professional portable", but there is still a bit of a gap with low-end SLR.

The telephoto end of the 18-55 sleeve is not enough (which is similar to the LX3), of course, depending on what you usually shoot. The lens quality of the LX3 is very high.

But according to your current situation, it's still lx3, I think it's definitely enough for daily use for so long, it's very feature-rich, and you're a newbie, right? Practice with LX3 first, and then use SLR if you are really interested in photography.

The LX3 is the best camera in its class, and if you are new to photography, you will definitely not regret buying it. Its opponent Canon G10 was beaten all over the ground by it, and some time ago Canon released the G11 and withdrew from the pixel battle in order to achieve high image quality, which is exactly what LX3 does, which indirectly shows that Canon is defeated.

The focal length of the LX3 and D3000 is about the same, and I recommend using the LX3 for girls, for the simple reason that the LX3 is the last camera from Panasonic to use a Leica technology lens! That's enough! And there is little to no back-stage investment!

The Nikon D3000's pullover is enough for general life shooting, but if you want to shoot something far away or close-up, you need to buy another lens, and the cost in the later stage is quite large!

Although the D3000 model is small enough, it still has no portable advantage compared with the card machine! Anyway, when I carry a bunch of equipment, I envy those who carry portable cameras!

The D3000 that LZ said should be Nikon's! I haven't arrived at the Panasonic LX3 yet, so I don't know the specific function, but look at the other ones that should be the kind of machines with long focal length and large zoom! Let's talk about SLR!

Nikon's D3000 is the most beginner machine in the SLR, if LZ wants to buy a SLR, it is better to spend more money to buy Canon's 500D or Nikon's D5000, Nikon's D3000 can not be framed with a screen, which is a failure. Generally, the 18-55 lens is equivalent to a 3x zoom effect in a card machine. Therefore, if LZ wants to get a DSLR, it is necessary to change the lens.

The most basic LZ also needs to be equipped with a 55-200 telephoto lens to meet the use! Nikon such a lens should be around 1500!

If you want to have a higher pursuit, or if you want to change the lens in the future, choose D3000, and if you are portable, you will choose LX3, and there will be a difference between the two under the magnification of **.

Generally speaking, a big one must be good.

LX3 is a very good machine, if you simply compare the picture quality, the D3000 set of machines is not comparable to LX3.

The basic truth of what I said upstairs is that the strongest SLR is a big CCD or CMOS. But they don't take into account the relationship between lenses, and to some extent (such as in the case of lack of money) they can consider low-end bodies with high-end lenses. The biggest problem with low-end SLR cameras is that the sleeve is too poor, which is often much worse than high-end digital cameras.

But with a good lens, the SLR is much higher than high-end digital cameras, and a good standard zoom lens is basically not less than 8,000.

Nikon's 18-55VR lens is okay, but it's only okay, and beginners can make do with it. But often beginners don't know how to use this short zoom, and inexperienced people will be confused about how to shoot well without telephoto**.

Nikon's more recommended camera for SLR is D90, the image quality is much stronger than D3000 and the like, not the same upstairs, it's a lot worse, look at ISO100 Maybe it's not obvious, ISO3200 immediately see the difference. And the D90's ease of use and handling are incomparable to those of the ultra-low-end.

The investment of a DSLR is much larger than that of a small number.

LX3, to this day no similar model has shaken its status.

Only the SLR is qualified to compare with the Panasonic LX3!

Definitely Panasonic LX3.

Quasi-professional camera.

An LX3 suppressed the Canon G9, G10, G11 three generations of flagship DC, and can still compete with G12 for customers, if Panasonic is garbage, Canon's consumer-grade DC can be classified as garbage in garbage.

Panasonic LX3 is very good, it is a very good product at that price, feel free to buy it, it will not disappoint you.

Panasonic LX3 line, with the new model LX5

If you choose LX3, you might as well choose LX5 directly.

Pentax kwhat? There are SLRs in your choice,There is a consumer-grade card machine,If you want to work well and save trouble, LX3 is better,S205It's just a far away from nothing! The lens is not comparable to the LX3.,LX3 is the Leica head.,The Canon and Nikon you fancy are SLRs.,How to say it.。。。

Some entry-level SLRs are inferior to high-end card players, or even far behind. The playability of the SLR is higher than that of the card machine, of course, the picture quality of the medium, medium and high, and high-end SLR is incomparable to the card machine! And if you fancy LX3, it's best to take a look at LX5, which is the king of consumer card machines!

To be honest, Canon's machine is not cost-effective S205 is about 2300 bare machine 67mm lens I CCD is still quite good It's that the zoom is a little smaller If you want to buy it, it's estimated that it's going to be online There are very few physical stores It is estimated that there are very few physical stores The purchase price is about the same According to the bargaining price on Jingdong, it will not be too bad I have done this before.

These two are currently considered powerful portable machines, and it is recommended that you use them yourself to compare and feel them.

LX3 Excellent: The appearance is small and compact, the retro design is still popular with everyone, the 24mm wide-angle indoor is easy to use, but unfortunately the deformation control is average, the large aperture can create a little depth of field effect (although it is not as good as the SLR, but it is still a little useful) It is also quite useful in the dark.

Missing: Write is a little slower than the G11 and has a shorter focal length of 24-60.

Focus is a little slower in close-ups, white balance accuracy could be improved, and battery life is a little worse, with about 200 frames without flashing lights.

G11 Excellent: Good write speed, good hand grip, complete arrangement of fast keys, almost no need to check the menu to set all shooting items, focusing is quite fast, the 28-140 focal length is quite practical, and the color tone is very pleasing, (maybe I'm used to the canon on the DSLR).

The electric continuous navigation is good, and there are more than 300 flashing lights.

Missing: The huge appearance looks a little heavier, the high ISO is average, and the performance is not as good as the LX3, of course, this is not the strength of the small DC.

In summary. The G11 and LX3 are both good machines! The G11 has good image quality at low ISO and a better grip (it is also relatively heavy and larger) and its focal length versatility is better, covering most of the commonly used focal lengths.

The LX3 is superior to its high ISO image quality, and it is also relatively light and easy to carry.

And its large aperture is paired with a high ISO cleaner image quality.

The success rate and image quality of shooting in low light in general indoor rooms have been greatly improved.

If you usually take your camera with you to shoot outside, and you will try to use a tripod to shoot night scenes, the G11 is a better choice.

If you have a high chance of taking photos indoors or handheld at night, the LX3 is a good choice.

If you like more people than the scenery, it is still recommended to go to G11

In fact, you can only understand what you need most after using the camera, or choose the machine according to your needs, and no machine is perfect.

They are all flagship products in consumer DC, and it is difficult to distinguish between them. However, you can buy Olympus EPL1 for the same, the body is small, and the imaging is much better, after all, the size of the sensor and the light transmission of the lens are not at the same level.

The LX3 has a 25mm wide angle, the G11 has 28mm, but the telephoto end reaches 210mm. It's all good.

Canon's this one is very good, good performance, excellent picture quality, there is also a manual function, if the landlord has time, you can use the comparison function of the 365 day purchase to compare, think about it more, and you will know how to choose.

I was also struggling with these two models, but then I chose the Panasonic LX3 and I didn't regret it.

They are all flagship products in consumer DC, and it is difficult to distinguish between them.

Panasonic LX3

AhhThe image quality is excellent, and it is better than the low-end entry-level set of images.

2.The battery life is good.

3.There are many manual functions.

4.The display is clear and detailed.

5.There are many buttons, especially a 5-way button for quick operation.

6.The shoulder straps can be worn around the neck for greater security.

7.The workmanship is fine, almost all metal shell, and the classmates praise it for being exquisiteLarge aperture, wide angle.

9.The weight and volume are right, and sometimes when you go out, you can just put it in your trouser pocket.10The official firmware update is fast, and there is a firmware upgrade not long after I bought it, and the upgrade range is relatively large, not the kind of small update that fixes the bug.

More than 3,000 Let's go to SLR.

Panasonic is not as professional as Canon, but Leica is more professional than Canon! Panasonic LX3 is a pirated Leica Lux4, the parameters are exactly the same, if you shoot the scenery is the only choice in the consumer machine.

It is unscientific to compare simple ones to which one is better.

Both cameras are top-notch cameras in their respective camps, and the image quality is on the same level! But the characteristics are different!

Compared with the G11, the LX3 has sharper images, more vivid colors, and a more beautiful appearance.

The G11 inherits the consistency of Canon cameras"Features:": Imaging is fleshy Colors are bland compared to the LX3 Noise control is slightly better than the LX3.

In addition, the question of which manufacturer you mentioned is professional"Let's put it this way, because the imaging process and structure of DC are different from those of DSLR, Canon has no obvious advantage over DC from its experience in traditional camera manufacturing. Moreover, traditional consumer electronics manufacturers such as Panasonic Sony sometimes have more advantages in industrial design imaging components.

Personally, I think the LX3 is more cost-effective, and both in terms of shape and workmanship, the imaging style is more pleasing!

Hehe! I also went to Bainaohui in the afternoon to play with these two cameras.

If you just want to buy a camera, and you shoot a lot of content, shoot everything, then G11. The overall performance currently no one can surpass it. There is also an LCD screen that can be reversed, which is too convenient for shooting from special angles.

And it's very sturdy, the right size, and it feels good in the hand. A stronger sense of professionalism. The disadvantage is that it is slightly larger, with a wide angle of only 28 mm.

If you already have a DSLR, then you must consider the LX3, one is small and easy to carry, and the other is a 24mm ultra-wide-angle lens with a large F2 aperture, which are all very distinctive. The disadvantage is that the operation feels poor and is squeamish.

To sum up, G11 is a good student, and everything is good enough. LX3 is a member of the study committee or sports committee, and the individual subject results are very outstanding.