Is Dorsey as powerful as they say? How do I think I m an imbecile again?

In fact, it is normal for LZ to think this way.

Dorsey is a defensive center with rough skills and good physical fitness, and it is difficult to predict their future prospects due to poor skills, so NBA teams will avoid risks and not select such players when they are drafted, which is the main reason why Big Ben Wallace was not selected that year.

If Dorsey hadn't followed this year's No. 1 Derrick Rose to the NCAA Finals, he would have been as likely to be as unqualified as Ben Wallace.

However, on the other hand, the University of Memphis is only a little famous for Dorsey's interior line, if it weren't for Dorsey's hard work of grabbing rebounds and defending the opponent's big man, Memphis University may not have reached the finals, and at the same time, in addition to playing poorly in the finals, Dorsey grabbed an average of 15 rebounds per game in the NCAA, which also proves his strength, and his rebounding ability is the smallest difference between the NBA and the NCAA

How powerful is Dorsey......

Do you think you're an imbecile?

I would like to ask, on what basis do you think ......?

Whether he is good or not, you have no capital to evaluate!

I don't know what you think of him as an imbecile player......Do those experts understand basketball? I just want to say one thing: at least you know better than you!!

The team has to give its players confidence, can't say that this player is not good, that player is not good, so it is normal to say anything, you have a judgment on your own, it's OK, just like listening to CCTV broadcast NBA, where Zhang Weiping always commented, how is this player, how is this coach, how is this tactic, some are P words, you have to really take it seriously, that game can be angry, so it doesn't matter what others say, the key is that you don't lose your own ideas and opinions

.It's not that the Rockets' players are all in the sky. It's the same with other teams.

Other teams will also say how good their players are in their city's newspapers, but no one knows the outcome, only after the game starts. It's like when Green was unknown when he didn't play in the summer league, and then he broke out in the summer league and started to brag about him again, just to give the outside world a deterrent and a kind of confidence to the fans. You can't choose him and say how garbage he is, right?

If so, what would he do?

Dorsey personally seems to be fine, he really wants to be big. If only he could be as energetic as Landry. Because if you look at his profile, you know that his rebounds are good, although the offense is not good, but the defense is outstanding.

The Rockets need that because he's not short of offensive guys right now, and if Dorsey is really a good blue-collar interior lineman, the Rockets won't be boasting about him. He's really one of the players the Rockets need. But his height is a problem.

It's good to be better than the rookies, but it's average to the guys in the NBA.

I think Dorsey is okay, after all, he has a blue-collar style and has room to play. Lucas Jr.'s strongest is offense, but the Rockets have Maddie Yao Ming and 2 people who occupy a lot of shots, and his style can't play. If he's on a team like the Timberwolves, Thunder (formerly SuperSonics), Grizzlies, maybe Lucas is not bad.

They are simply emphasizing the level of the person in a certain period of time.

If you look at the ranks, you can see that they are not that powerful at all, and there is also speculation about its commercial value for high-energy players

After all, Dorsey is still a blue-collar worker, his strength is defense, and to put it mildly, he is a meat shield next to Yao Ming. If you look at him by the standards of a star, he is indeed not very good, but if you look at him according to the standards of blue-collar workers, he is still expected!

Are you talking about yourself?

If this is the case, I think what you should solve is the problem of your own low score and low ability, if you have low scores and low ability, then let yourself have high scores and high energy, and when you really have the ability and really pay, you will win the respect of others.

Huh: How can you say that? Have you ever heard such a sentence: Great wisdom is foolish, hehe, the scores and abilities of your student days, when you enter the society, and the day you really grow up, you will understand that the so-called high grades and abilities in school are nothing in the current society, the main thing is whether you have a positive confidence Do you remember such words?

The heavens will descend on the people, and they will suffer their minds, strain their muscles and bones, starve their bodies and skin, and the problem you describe is in the stage of (suffering their minds) It's a good thing to experience some setbacks when you're a teenager! This will be of great help to your development in the future

1. I don't believe in anyone who is born inferior to others. The dullness and lethargy of a person are mostly related to his early experience, the excessive harshness of the environment.

2. Exercise more and read more. Flexibility exercises, in particular, will make the brain more oxygen supply and more responsive.

3. Communicate honestly, when others are annoyed, you should express your emotions and thoughts moderately, don't blindly feel inferior and fearful, and don't be afraid that expressing your emotions will cause a series of reprimands. You are now over-endorsing other people's opinions because of fear – that you can't do anything well, it's all your fault, and everyone else is right. Not necessarily.

It is likely that because of your self-ashamed attitude, others will think that it is okay to be simple and rude to you. That's what human nature is.

4. Respect others from the bottom of your heart, and at the same time respect yourself.

May you be confident.

Problems with your way of thinking and comprehension may be related to your earlier experiences.

It's good to marry me, hehe.

Ben Gordon (Bobcats), salary this season: $12.4 million.

Hido Turkoglu (Magic), salary for the season: $11.8 million.

Corey Margetty (Pistons), this season's salary: $10.9 million.

Ah, this kind of question is outdated

Kobe Bryant is absolutely well-paid and incompetent.

You've watched too many movies or **, there are no planets in the solar system that are suitable for living creatures except the earth, and even if there were, it would have invaded the earth a long time ago, and would it still allow us humans to develop? Aren't they afraid that we will threaten their survival? It's time for you to wake up!!

I don't think so. If aliens really have a high level of intelligence, it's just that we humans haven't evolved to that extent. Some galaxies may be earlier than Earth, and there are highly intelligent beings who have been living for many light-years, so they should be earlier. It's just that we evolved late.

Maybe you've watched too many fantasy movies or**...Are there aliens?Huh....Perhaps...

Patently wrong. From the point of view of criminology, crime arises from a combination of internal and external causes. External factors undoubtedly play a decisive role in the occurrence of crime.

People who commit crimes are not necessarily imbecile, and with the development of the times, the large number of high-IQ crimes is enough to directly refute this view.

This argument is unreasonable, there are many reasons that induce crime, the social cause is the main one, and the personal cause is secondary.

Crime has nothing to do with IQ.

References:

I think that people with high scores and low ability have development potential, and they have good knowledge of low ability and high scores, good skills such as arithmetic and English, and they are admitted to the situation clearly.

Is it wrong, it should be "high score and low energy, high energy and low score"!

I've always felt that there is a contradiction in the phrase "high score and low ability", how can an imbecile person get a high score? Anyone who has read a book knows that high energy is a necessary condition for high scores. It is only possible to have high grades and low scores, and there can be no high scores and low abilities, but it is just a difference in the way of education or individual efforts.

High can have low scores, because if only the score is high, it doesn't mean anything, just say that he is hardworking, it doesn't mean that he is very smart, and he has no practical ability to go out of the society in the future, you look at some famous people now, such as Edison, his grades were also very poor when he was a child, but he didn't still invent a lot of useful things, on the contrary, I read a report that said that a college student who graduated in New York came out to work as a porter, and was fired, so it's not everything, You can't judge others by one person's achievements, it's important to have the ability.

I wonder why a person has strengths and weaknesses?

This is why a person can go from good to bad and from bad to good.

A person has a good side, he can do a lot, and the bad things can be done well in him.

On the contrary, a person does not have a good side, but what this person does is not beyond the destruction of the real side, and it is also acceptable, in general: "Good people are not absolute, it depends on whether you are willing to dig up, many things are not ready-made!"

A high score may be incompetent, but most imbeciles will not score highly. There is no one uniform standard. It's hard to say.

How do you say this, it's not so much to criticize your peers.

When the tree is big, there are all kinds of birds, and the development models of the two insurance companies are different! This is the root cause.