Is it reasonable for a lawyer to do so? What a Dispute Resolution Lawyer Does

Reasonable, the Bar Association stipulates that the risk** cannot exceed 30%. He can be a citizen**.

In fact, many lawyers accept such private work, and the law stipulates that lawyers** must be carried out through a law firm. In other words, if he takes private work, he cannot appear in court as a lawyer, but can only help you in litigation as an ordinary citizen. However, China's Civil Procedure Law stipulates that it is not possible to ask for remuneration for helping others in litigation activities as a citizen.

Therefore, this kind of personal work is clearly illegal.

As for whether it is reasonable or not, it depends on whether you think it is worth it. In fact, there are many such operations, so please feel that it is worth it.

ps: It's best to take a look at the lawyer's certificate or something, and have a bottom in your heart.

30% is legal and unreasonable, this type of civil lawsuit is like a divorce case, if the amount is relatively large, the execution of the money is generally returned, so the lawyer is also more willing to pay energy, as for the lawyer's certificate, it is not a criminal prosecution is also possible, but if he says that he has lawyer qualifications, then it should be shown to you, because it involves the question of which lawyer to choose.

If he is indeed a lawyer, and you have agreed before, and he has completed the formalities, then it is legal.

If he is not a lawyer, or if he does not have the relevant documents issued by the law firm, he is breaking the law.

Risk ** cannot be applied to labor dispute cases, and its behavior is illegal. As for the risk ratio, it has not yet exceeded the 30% limit.

If he doesn't give you the formalities, he won't work.

Job Responsibilities:1Conduct legal compliance reviews of corporate decisions and business activities;

2.Participate in and manage the company's litigation cases and risk events;

3.Provide dispute resolution for the company's litigation cases and potential cases;

4.Provide legal support for corporate risk events;

5.Supervise and assist external counsel in corporate arbitration and litigation cases;

6.Communicate and coordinate with judicial departments and regulatory authorities;

7.conducting research on legal issues;

8.Advising the company's management and business units.

What is the role and importance of a contract dispute lawyer after a contract dispute occurs?

After the occurrence of contract disputes, the role of contract dispute lawyers is mainly manifested in four aspects: reconciliation, mediation, arbitration and litigation. 1. Facilitate reconciliation.

For the disputes that can be resolved through negotiation in contract disputes, the contract dispute lawyer will promote the negotiation between the two parties on the basis of respecting the interests of both parties and reach a consensus on the content of the dispute, so as to resolve the contract dispute.

2. Promote mediation.

The contract dispute lawyer accepts the commission and convinces the opposing party to resolve the dispute through mediation. In the process of dealing with such matters, the lawyer can assume the role of a third party to preside over the mediation and prepare a mediation agreement to prompt both parties to perform their respective obligations in accordance with the mediation agreement.

3. Arbitration. The contract dispute lawyer accepts the entrustment, and the client submits the dispute to the arbitration authority for adjudication and resolution of the dispute, which can save the time and energy of the parties.

4. Litigation. After the occurrence of a contract dispute, if the other party files a lawsuit with the court, or the award or mediation document is not performed, the contract dispute lawyer accepts the entrustment and litigates.

In many cases, the technical and technical requirements for contract signing, contract performance, and contract dispute settlement are high, and there are certain risks to the operation and property safety of both parties. Therefore, in terms of contract validity, performance ability, and ability to identify trap clauses, high requirements are put forward for the contractor. Because of their professionalism, contract dispute lawyers can prevent all kinds of disputes, accurately judge the responsibilities of both parties in the dispute, prevent risks, and properly resolve disputes.

Summary: The role and importance of lawyers in contract dispute cases run through the entire contract, the fairness and justice of the signing can be guaranteed, the effective implementation of the contract is to ensure the effective implementation of the contract, and the interests of the parties can be effectively protected after the contract dispute occurs.

Summary. Pro, China's "Civil Code" has clear provisions on the termination of the contract, allowing the parties to the contract to terminate the contract at any time. If the client and the law firm have signed a ** contract, it can be handled in accordance with the above provisions of the Civil Code.

Dear, I am glad to answer the lawyer for you In this case, you can negotiate with the law firm to terminate the service relationship, and the lawyer's fee is generally paid according to the progress of the lawyer's actual work, and the excess lawyer's fee should be refunded to the client. However, if there is an agreement in the lawyer's service contract on the handling of lawyers' fees, it shall be handled in accordance with the contract.

Dear, China's "Civil Code" has clear provisions on the termination of the contract, allowing the parties to the contract to terminate the contract at any time. If the client has signed a ** contract with the law firm, it can be handled in accordance with the above provisions of the Civil Code.

First, lawyers are proficient in laws and regulations, including substantive law and procedural law, and have the ability to investigate cases.

Second, on the basis of his knowledge of laws and regulations and legal reasoning ability, lawyers can also organize and debate arguments and evidence materials in favor of their clients in a logically rigorous and complete manner according to specific cases, and such debates are not necessarily directly related to the creeds or likes and dislikes held by the lawyer.

Third, the lawyer should be familiar with the practice of law, especially the practical matters related to litigation. To be a good lawyer, you often gradually grasp and master various procedural techniques after repeatedly handling a large number of cases, which is not only a matter of knowledge, but also includes experience and skills. This is clearly something that the parties do not have.

Fourth, in terms of the relationship with the case or dispute itself, the parties themselves are direct stakeholders and can often only approach the litigation from their own subjective standpoint, while the lawyer can maintain a certain distance and grasp the situation objectively and calmly because the case is essentially a problem of others.

Fifth, lawyers, as persons engaged in specialized professions, are subject to the special ethical norms of professional groups. Although he is in the same legal profession as a judge, a lawyer is not an ancillary part of the judiciary. He took a neutral position in the proceedings.

When a lawyer accepts the entrustment of a family member, of course he will be responsible for the client, and of course he must tell the truth, but if it is illegal or criminal to pass it on, the lawyer may not pass it on. Lawyers must not violate prohibitive provisions when meeting with them, and some major norms may be enumerated: 1. Lawyers must not pass on any clues about the circumstances of the case to criminal suspects or defendants, including leads on reporting and exposing crimes; 2. You can't use your own mobile phone to let the criminal suspect or defendant communicate with the outside world; 3. Confessions must not be colluded with criminal suspects, pants, or defendants in various ways, nor can they be used to convey information suspected of collusion by means such as body language or entrainment notes or handpalm writing; 4. Non-lawyers must not be brought to the meeting, let alone the family members of criminal suspects or defendants must not be brought to the meeting; 5. It is not possible to transmit to criminal suspects or defendants all kinds of information or items prohibited by the supervision site; 6. Prevent criminal suspects or defendants from escaping from places of custody by taking the opportunity of meetings; 7. Pay attention to the way of communication and speaking, and cannot teach the parties how to speak; 8. Prohibiting dredging relationships and promising the outcome of the case; 9. Listen patiently to the statements of the parties, but be cautious when the prospect of the case; 10. It is not appropriate to directly ask the parties whether they have committed the alleged criminal acts.