If a thief enters the house and is injured by the owner, the owner should not be held responsible

If the owner injures the thief during the confrontation between the thieves, the owner does not bear legal responsibility, which is self-defense, and if the thief injures the thief in the case of complete surrender, this is intentional injury.

It depends on the situation, if the owner does not defend excessively, he does not have to bear judicial responsibility.

Look at how the lawyer fooled the judge.

If a thief accidentally falls and injures himself when he steals something from someone's house, the owner must not be responsible for this, it must be the thief who is responsible, and the thief also bears certain criminal responsibility for the theft.

There is no need to be responsible, because it is illegal for a thief to steal something, and it is not because the owner cannot create a crime of harm to a third party, so the owner does not need to be responsible.

There is no need to be held responsible for this, because it was the thief's own actions that caused him to be injured.

In other words, ordinary thieves, as long as they are sent to the public security organs, they may only be detained for less than 15 days, and will not be punished much, according to the following legal provisions:

If it was just a skin injury, not even a minor injury, after being sent to the public security organ, the public security officer would only persuade him, and then arrest the thief, and the owner would record a confession and let him go, because there was no excessive beating. And this kind of small injury, it is about scratching the thief with his fingernails, slapping him, stretching his foot and tripping the thief, but he is not injured.

Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Public Security Administration Punishments

assaulting others, causing minor injuries;

unlawfully restricting the personal liberty of others, or illegally trespassing into the homes of others;

openly insulting others or fabricating facts to slander others;

Abuse of a family member, and the abused person requests to be dealt with;

Writing threatening letters or using other methods to threaten the safety of others or interfere with the normal life of others;

coercing or enticing persons under the age of 18 to perform horrific or cruel programs, destroying their physical and mental health;

Concealing, destroying, or privately opening other people's mail or telegrams.

3. Ordinary people have an impulsive period, as long as they don't fight too much, it's just a pain of flesh and skin, and they don't support the owner to be responsible. But everyone understands that the thief is extremely angry at the moment of being caught, so everyone inevitably wants to beat him first, but he can't beat him to death. Generally speaking, if they hit or kick a few times, even if they get into trouble with the public security organs, they will not be too entangled in the fact that the master has beaten someone; Although it is also illegal to hit lightly, there is always a reason, and if it is not serious, most of it will be like this.

It's just that if lynching is used after being caught, and there is abuse, claustrophobia, and private detention, then you need to bear legal responsibility. Here's an example:

If the thief is caught and kicks him a few times, the owner is only advised and does not need to be responsible;

If he breaks his leg after being caught, he is suspected of the crime of intentional injury and needs to be criminally responsible;

If he is caught, he will be locked up in his room for three days without food or drink, and he will be suspected of illegal detention and will be held responsible.

Generally speaking, the thief was injured by the owner when he entered the house, which is related to the thief's injury, if it is only a slight injury, he is basically not responsible; But if the injury is more than slight, the owner needs to be responsible.

Legally speaking, he is responsible, although he illegally invades a private place, you can call the police, wait for the police to deal with it, and should not injure him, but in reality I think that the corresponding protective measures can be used to control the bandits.

is responsible, because after all, it was he who stole things and injured the owner, so he bears all the responsibility.

First of all, it has entered my home, my personal safety is not guaranteed, and when he sees me, he will definitely beat him, and the situation must be because this is my home.

In Europe and the United States, you can shoot, but in China the criminal is God, and if you don't supply it well, you have to fight a lawsuit! In case of robbers, the countrymen must say: I will let you make three moves first. Otherwise, you will be convicted!

There is no psychological pressure when a thief is stealing, but how much psychological burden does the thief need to bear when the thief is caught.

There is no need to be responsible, thieves deserve to break into our homes. Then we beat the thief as a sign of self-defense, and they can only consider themselves unlucky.

This depends on the plot, read more books to learn and learn law. Article 23 of the "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Public Security Administration Punishments" Where any of the following acts of infringing on public or private property is not sufficient for criminal punishment, a person shall be detained or warned for up to 15 days, and may be fined up to 200 yuan alone or concurrently: stealing, fraudulently obtaining, or snatching a small amount of public or private property; looting state, collective, or personal property; extortion of public or private property; Intentionally damaging public or private property.

You're talking nonsense,, if someone finds a thief in their sleep at night, and he's in your house, aren't you talking nonsense? If I want to go to your house, do you say you can do it? Can you restrain yourself?

If you don't fight, you can't control it, you must be injured, because ordinary people have not been trained, and they have not learned the method of hitting people without leaving injuries, and then it depends on who is behind them.

You must be responsible, catching thieves is a matter for the police, you can only call the police, and also, it's not right for thieves to steal things, and it's not right for you to hit people, is that right?