Is it a crime to do so? Can anyone help me with that! Thank you very much!

1. The crime of fraud is a public prosecution case, not a private prosecution case, so even if the unit does not pursue it, the public security organ can still hold you responsible.

Second, the pedestrian has a recording, and you want to prove that 70,000 yuan was given to the pedestrian, which is not easy.

Since the company is willing to help you, you let the company say that you only applied for 50,000 yuan with the company, and the company only gave you 50,000 yuan. So that you don't have to break the law. As for the excess 20,000, it should be returned to the company as soon as possible.

"Fraud" refers to the act of using fictitious facts or methods to conceal the truth for the purpose of illegal possession to defraud a large amount of public or private property. In this case, your actions are civil deception, not fraud. Because you did not fabricate facts and did not conceal the truth of the case, but concealed and overreported the compensation.

Rather, it's a matter of being a person, not a criminal offense.

Issue. 1. If your behavior has constituted the crime of fraud, the unit will not pursue it, and the public security organ can also pursue your legal responsibility. But now the public security organs have generally ignored no one to report the case.

Issue. 2. If the Public Security Bureau comes to you for an investigation, if there is any other evidence, you will not admit it, and it can also be determined that you have cheated the company of money. Unless only the other side testifies.

Suggestion: If the employer already knows, return the money to the employer.

embezzled 20,000 yuan from the unit, and has been suspected of the crime of embezzlement.

Article 271 of the Criminal Law [Crime of Embezzlement in Public Office] Personnel of a company, enterprise, or other unit who take advantage of their position to illegally take possession of the unit's property, and the amount is relatively large, are to be sentenced to up to five years imprisonment or short-term detention; where the amount involved is huge, the sentence is to be five or more years imprisonment, and property may be confiscated concurrently.

Zongheng Legal Network-Jiangsu Sushang Law Firm-Zhao Yong lawyer.

Yes is a crime suspected of fraud.

Your cousin and the three of them committed a joint crime, and the specific circumstances of the fight are unknown, but they are generally convicted of intentional aggressiveness and filial piety (some cases are also convicted of intentional homicide, depending on the specific circumstances). As you say, in a joint crime, A is the principal offender and bears the primary responsibility. Your brother and c are generally found to be accomplices.

The specific sentencing can be to what extent depends on the specific circumstances of the case and the specific role played by your brother in the case. If the compensation is good, the forgiveness of the victim's family is obtained, and the effect of the punishment in the course of the crime is really small, it is also possible to give a suspended sentence. Of course, a is impossible.

It is recommended that you find a lawyer to intervene and provide you with professional advice and assistance according to the specific circumstances of the case.

Actively compensate, and if the family of the deceased can reach an understanding, forensic identification + witness testimony, etc., it is best to make Yu Xianghao civil disputes accidental, in short, it is very important to spend vertical money, the lightest banquet potatoes also have to be 5 years, of course, if the money is enough, it can be cleared again.

"Can he accuse me of stealing on the basis of this? Can I be sued? Can I be charged? ”

1. He can't sue you for stealing;

2. He can sue you;

3. He can't charge me.

Why did I say he can sue you, because he said: "Give you 850 yuan at the cost, and then pay the salary, and the 100 commission will also be given to you (100 commissions means that whoever has a contract plan for a customer will give 100 commissions, I will open one myself, and he will count)" The premise is that you work in his company. But "two days later, I stopped working in **."

If you violate the agreement to work in his shop, you will naturally lose the conditions for enjoying the preferential treatment in his shop. Therefore, he said, "According to the original price of the mobile phone 999 yuan to me, so I have to make up 618 yuan, and said, if you are not an employee of the company, you will press this **, and there is no commission of 100 yuan!" There is nothing wrong with that.

The premise is that you are a civil dispute, and the text message is basically to scare you.

However, from a normal point of view, the act of saving money to send mobile phones and phone bills is the right to interpret in the telecom company, and their statement is not unreasonable, and the company is 618 yuan. There is nothing right or wrong, it is originally a telecom employee who gives a discount, and it is human nature that you quit your job and not give it, not to mention that you haven't paid yet.

I tell you from a professional point of view, it certainly does not constitute the crime of theft, and the previous acquisition is legal, which is a civil dispute.

A is guilty of robbery and intentional homicide.

First of all, A's impounded car, because it was under the management of the authorities, was treated as public property, and when A wanted to get the car back, it was blocked, and A injured people in order to get the car back, which constituted the crime of robbery.

The second one is easy to analyze, and anyone with a little legal common sense knows that it is homicide.

The crime of robbery and intentional homicide shall be punished concurrently.

Hello 1, justifiable defense is aimed at the illegal infringement that is happening, after all, the guest has gone out, it is difficult to prove its purpose (it may be to prepare to leave, or it may be to find a stone), at this time your friend's pursuit behavior can not be recognized as legitimate defense.

2. Whether your friend has committed a crime depends on the consequences of the damage. If it is a minor injury, it is a public security dispute; If it is a minor injury, based on the cause and background of the case, if the compensation and settlement are actively compensated, the crime may not be handled; If it is a serious injury, it is impossible to settle privately, and criminal proceedings are required, but if it can be reconciled, the chances of a suspended sentence are still very high, and in practice there are very few cases where it is not pursued.

The so-called justifiable defense should be: when the guest goes out to pick up a stone and is about to fight again, your friend stops him with behavior.

Article 234 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China: Whoever intentionally injures the body of another person shall be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release.

Hello, your friend may have committed a crime, it is advisable to appoint a lawyer to provide legal help to your friend.

Zongheng Legal Network-Beijing Guotao Law Firm-Lawyer Lu Zhihong.

If the guest is really out to pick up stones, and your friend is only trying to prevent the guest from continuing to hurt his father, it should constitute legitimate defense; However, if he sees his father being beaten and chases after the guest, he cannot establish legitimate defense.

Hello, according to what you said, you can rest assured that this matter has nothing to do with you.

According to the theory of criminal law, you did not have the intention to commit a crime, to be precise, you did not have the intention to hide stolen goods, and according to the principle of consistency between subjectivity and objectivity in criminal law, you did not violate the criminal law.

To be precise, you have at most constituted unjust enrichment under civil law, but since the police have confiscated the stolen goods, your unjust enrichment will disappear with it.

To sum up, you can rest assured, this matter has nothing to do with you, and enjoy life to the fullest!

You've never been involved, your friends haven't told you, you're completely unaware, you have nothing to do with you.

If, as you say, you were not involved in the theft, and you didn't know about the notebook that was given to you afterwards, then you are a witness.

1. Whoever intentionally injures the body of another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release.

Whoever commits the crime of failing to pay for the foresail and causes serious injury shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years.

Punishment; Causing death or serious bodily injury by particularly cruel means, resulting in serious disability.

shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment or death.

2. Illegally detaining others or illegally stripping others by other means.

and where the personal liberty of others is deprived, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, or controlled release is to be given.

deprived of political rights. Where there are circumstances of beating or insulting, a heavier punishment is to be given.

Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph and causes serious injury to another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years.

Punishment; and where death is caused, the sentence is to be 10 or more years imprisonment.

b is in fact suspected of the offence of embezzlement. Although there are difficulties in obtaining evidence, it cannot be denied that B subjectively illegally took possession of other people's property, and the fact that he took possession of A's property in bad faith.

This is a question that even ordinary people can judge with common sense. It's just that for legal professionals, it's a bit difficult for us to find relevant evidence to prove it.

Obviously, B does not constitute a crime, and B is suspected of embezzlement only if there is sufficient evidence to support that A's money is in B's possession and B refuses to return it.

The key is to prove that the money in the card is A's, so that B can constitute a crime. In this case, it is quite difficult to collect evidence.

B's behavior does not constitute a crime, because B has legal formalities and documents when applying for cards and picking up styles; If A can prove that the paragraph is indeed A's, he may request B to return it.

As far as you say, no one has committed a crime, there is no fraud, there is only a financial dispute; Girls are minors at the age of 15 and have not reached the legal age for marriage. After the implementation of the Regulations on the Administration of Marriage Registration of the Ministry of Civil Affairs on February 1, 1994, those who have not applied for a marriage certificate and only hold a marriage ceremony to tell the child or have already given birth to a child are no longer regarded as de facto marriages and are characterized as cohabitation, and one or both parties can dissolve the cohabitation relationship on their own. Note:

Article 5: Where a man and a woman who have not completed marriage registration in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of the Marriage Law and live together as husband and wife and sue the People's Court for divorce shall be treated differently: (1) Before the promulgation and implementation of the Ministry of Civil Affairs' "Regulations on the Administration of Marriage Registration" on February 1, 1994, where both men and women have met the substantive requirements for marriage, it shall be handled as a de facto marriage; (2) After the promulgation and implementation of the Ministry of Civil Affairs' "Regulations on the Administration of Marriage Registration" on February 1, 1994, where both a man and a woman meet the substantive requirements for marriage, the people's court shall inform them to apply for marriage registration before accepting the case; If the marriage registration is not completed, it shall be handled as the dissolution of the cohabitation relationship. If one party dissolves the cohabitation relationship on his own, there may be a bride price dispute.

Refer to the "Marriage Law" Interpretation (2) Article 10: Where a party requests the return of the bride price paid in accordance with custom, the people's court shall support it if it is ascertained that it falls under the following circumstances: (1) The parties have not gone through the marriage registration formalities; (2) The parties have gone through marriage registration formalities but do not live together; (3) Payments made before marriage and causing hardship to the payor. The application of the provisions of items (2) and (3) of the preceding paragraph shall be conditional on the divorce of both parties.

Note: If the girl buys the full amount of the sheep and asks the socks to be raised at the man's house, then there will be no refund after the girl leaves (the cohabitation relationship is dissolved), but if the purchased sheep are raised at the home of her biological parents, the judgment of the court in question is generally full or partial refund. 】