Is it normal for 3D Mark06 to run 7574?

Updated on number 2024-05-29
19 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    It's normal that your resolution is the highest and your organic score has decreased.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Very normal. Your graphics card isn't very high-end.

    The memory is large and useless.

    The graphics card is the bottleneck.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Yes, I still use the Pentium630. OK.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Very good and powerful, I only ran 12000 in 03

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    It shouldn't be normal, and it's about the same to 1w by default.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Normal. Of course, also look at how your 3D mark06 is set up.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Almost, the frequency is not very high, those who say that they can tens of thousands are either low resolution, or the main frequency is very high, reaching about 650. So the normal resolution, the normal main frequency, is seven or eight thousand. Yours is a little lower, it should be the motherboard is worse.

    GT130 should run on 1024x768, right? I don't think it's running with 1280*1024.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    First of all, your 3DMark is not activated, go and search for a serial number to see the results directly. It's a bit abnormal.,It stands to reason that the CPU won't be this score.,9600GSO with a dual-core is generally more than 8000 points, the problem is not very big,There's no problem with heat dissipation,If the video memory of your graphics card is384M, it's a little abnormal,If it's 192M, it's reasonable。

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    06 is not only to examine the performance of the graphics card, but also to add the processing power of the CPU to the score, which is a good score.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    This score is good, my 8600GTS is only more than 6,000 because the CPU is not good....10,000 points to run Call of Duty Five smoothly like flying....

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It's normal for 260 to run around 1w4.

    The CPU can also be over-lowered, no problem to 1w5.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    A high running score doesn't tell the story. Let's test it out through the game.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    There is something very wrong with your mind! PD is too rubbish!! Of course, you can't run too well with such a good graphics card! Although today's games have high requirements for the graphics card, the CPU also has a lot of weight! Such an unbalanced configuration is bound to fail!

    Since you want to run a game, if you don't want to spend more money, you can sell this PD, change to a 45nm Celeron dual-core E3200 back, E3200 costs 300 yuan, I believe your 925 can also be sold for 300, so you don't need to spend more money! However, due to the use of the Core architecture, the performance of the e3200 has been improved a lot! And it's so easy to do it!

    Originally, the default frequency could kill PD 925 in seconds!!

    To make a comparison: AMD 5000+ has 1950 points, while E3200 can kill 5200+ by default frequency, which means that the score is at least more than 2000! If it is exceeded, then 2500 points will definitely not be a problem!

    It's much better to run the game that way! And the E3200 is much more energy-efficient than the PD 925! Saving 100 yuan a year on electricity bills is not a problem!

    So it's a good deal to change to E3200!

    Of course, if you have money, you will exchange it for a better one! Such as E7400

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The score is normal, your PD CPU is too rubbish, in the score of 3DMark-06, the CPU score accounts for a large proportion, your CPU is only more than 1500 points, and the total score of 7000 is normal. Although the PD 925 is dual-core and has a high frequency, the core is so poor that it has severely limited the performance of your graphics card. GTA4 is a very CPU-eating game, your PD925 must play GTA4 is not smooth, it is recommended to upgrade the CPU, even if it is not a quad-core, the last E5300 is much better than your current one.

    With a score of more than 10,000, you need at least a more mainstream dual-core, and yours can't do it.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    That's pretty much the end of your configuration.

    My 9600GT amd5200+ (a little overclocked) 2G RAM 800 can run 10200

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    It's not 3DMark, the score should be normal, and there are still a lot of computers in the 2%.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    LS, you didn't take into account that this is a card, the 3DMark test is inherently inclined to the N card, so it is not reliable, it can only be A and A or N and N ratio. So bad CPU, there are 9636 normal.

    In fact, the real game performance must be explained by the FPS value under the same setting. You can use flaps to monitor the frame rate and compare it with the Internet.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    e6600?,This CPU isn't what it looks like.,The default score is normal.。

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Are you driving too high with resolution and AA? 1280x1024 should be around 13000.

Related questions
20 answers2024-05-29

3600 or so, a little bit related to the motherboard, CPU, memory.

10 answers2024-05-29

The size of the resolution is different depending on the running score. >>>More

14 answers2024-05-29

x11 exclusive).

Processor: Intel AMD dual-core processor. >>>More

5 answers2024-05-29

There is something very wrong with your mind! PD is too rubbish!! Of course, you can't run too well with such a good graphics card! Although today's games have high requirements for the graphics card, the CPU also has a lot of weight! Such an unbalanced configuration is bound to fail! >>>More

17 answers2024-05-29

I'm dizzy. You probably won't be able to buy a fake this year. >>>More