Is it normal for me to run 7046 points with 3D mark06?

There is something very wrong with your mind! PD is too rubbish!! Of course, you can't run too well with such a good graphics card! Although today's games have high requirements for the graphics card, the CPU also has a lot of weight! Such an unbalanced configuration is bound to fail!

Since you want to run a game, if you don't want to spend more money, you can sell this PD, change to a 45nm Celeron dual-core E3200 back, E3200 costs 300 yuan, I believe your 925 can also be sold for 300, so you don't need to spend more money! However, due to the use of the Core architecture, the performance of the e3200 has been improved a lot! And it's so easy to do it!

Originally, the default frequency could kill PD 925 in seconds!!

To make a comparison: AMD 5000+ has 1950 points, while E3200 can kill 5200+ by default frequency, which means that the score is at least more than 2000! If it is exceeded, then 2500 points will definitely not be a problem!

It's much better to run the game that way! And the E3200 is much more energy-efficient than the PD 925! Saving 100 yuan a year on electricity bills is not a problem!

So it's a good deal to change to E3200!

Of course, if you have money, you will exchange it for a better one! Such as E7400

The score is normal, your PD CPU is too rubbish, in the score of 3DMark-06, the CPU score accounts for a large proportion, your CPU is only more than 1500 points, and the total score of 7000 is normal. Although the PD 925 is dual-core and has a high frequency, the core is so poor that it has severely limited the performance of your graphics card. GTA4 is a very CPU-eating game, your PD925 must play GTA4 is not smooth, it is recommended to upgrade the CPU, even if it is not a quad-core, the last E5300 is much better than your current one.

With a score of more than 10,000, you need at least a more mainstream dual-core, and yours can't do it.

That's pretty much the end of your configuration.

My 9600GT amd5200+ (a little overclocked) 2G RAM 800 can run 10200

Your graphics card uses 9600gs 512 cores, which is a simplified version of the 9600gt, and the performance is between the 9500GT and the old 9600GSO, which is not bad, because with 256bit memory bit width and more stream processors, the anti-aliasing performance is much better than the 9500gt.

It should be said that your running score is low, I don't know what resolution you are using, in addition, 3DMark06 is also very sensitive to CPU frequency, for a graphics card of this grade of 9600GSO 512, the impact of high resolution and high anti-aliasing on the performance of the graphics card is very obvious. So if the resolution is higher, or the CPU isn't overclocked, then this score is pretty normal.

At present, it seems that your configuration is relatively balanced,E3200Although the name is Celeron,But its specifications and performance are basically the same as the Pentium E2 series,And the 45nm process also makes it better than the 65nm Pentium E2 series has better overclocking ability and lower power consumption,G31The chipset can easily crack the Intel external frequency wall by setting the PCI-E frequency to Auto,It has amazing overclocking potential (higher than the P43 chipset that is difficult by Intel in every way), It is recommended that you do not waste the potential of the chipset and overclock the CPU appropriately to improve performance.

I don't know what the upstairs said.,It's normal for the LZ configuration to run this score.,It belongs to the mid-to-high-end game configuration.,It's no problem to deal with the current mainstream games.。