Which Japanese CVT transmission has better durability?

Speaking of CVT gearboxes.

It must be known to everyone, and it is as most Japanese cars.

Both use the gearbox, there is Nissan.

type and Honda. There are two models. However, it is obvious that the current market recognition of Honda's CVT gearbox is a little higher, not only because Honda has the world's first engine, but also because Honda perfectly integrates the engine and CVT transmission together to form a harmonious power system.

So why is the CVT gearbox called the best gearbox among Japanese cars? That's because it relies mainly on high-strength transmission belts to achieve wide gear ratios, and at the same time relies on high-precision oil pressure control systems to achieve optimal oil pressure to the flywheel in various driving conditions and environments to improve fuel economy. That's why most Japanese cars use CVT transmissions, because Japanese cars have a big "label" of fuel economy, and CVT transmissions can help them amplify this advantage.

The reason why most Japanese cars use CVT transmissions is, of course, because there are many advantages of CVT transmissions themselves. One is that it can achieve a wide gear ratio and continuous transmission of power, this technology is currently only available to the CVT gearbox, in plain terms it is able to ensure sufficient power, so that the engine maintains a relatively stable speed, but the whole body is constantly accelerating, as we all know, the engine runs at a lower speed is the guarantee of fuel saving.

Another advantage of CVT gearbox is its small size, simple structure and low cost. The general gearbox is made of rubber belts, metal belts and metal chains and other parts to achieve gear changes, while CVT mainly relies on the main, driven wheels and metal belts to achieve stepless changes in the speed ratio, and this transmission combination makes its power change quite smooth. And because the CVT gearbox is small and lightweight, it can be loaded to reduce the weight of the body, thus reducing the burden on the engine.

At present, JATCO CVT should be the only manufacturer that can withstand large torque, unique technology, which is why only CVT with small torque can be seen on other cars, but Nissan JATCO can use the top CVT in large displacement off-road vehicles. Nissan JAT is the world's largest continuously variable transmission manufacturer, the world's third largest transmission manufacturer, the largest torque CVT world record holder, no manufacturer can match the model with CVT to the second, only Nissan JAT can do it! JATCO currently has a maximum torque CVT of 450 Nm and should cover almost all of the following models, uniquely.

You go for a Toyota-Honda CVT with a 380 Nm engine, is there one? Confirmation. Nissan Jat can have high-torque CVT technology, because Nissan has bet on CVT, the technology is the most awesome, can be matched with large off-road, high-torque models, such as the new Teana 380 Nm engine acceleration seconds have been better than many AT performance, in North America with displacement Infiniti QX60, this car is the North American seven-seat luxury SUV sales champion, Americans are extremely recognized.

Toyota's CVT gearbox is stable and durable, and has been used in its own models for a long time, and the technology is mature and reliable, so far there has been no negative press. Therefore, Toyota's CVT is the most exciting of Nissan's top three.

I think some people are very brainless, and they simply like which one to praise which! Japanese three CVT gearboxes, talk about popularity, affirm Nissan's Jetco is higher, talk about power response, Honda Toyota Nissan, talk about durability, life, Nissan Toyota Honda! Look at the problem rationally!

I've driven Nissan's car, and Nissan's CVT acceleration is very meaty, and the start is very gentle, not explosive, and the starting acceleration is very gentle. Honda's CVT is different, no matter the starting acceleration is fast, Honda's starting acceleration is faster than Nissan's, and Honda's displacement accelerates faster than Nissan's, maybe because of the CVT, right? But in terms of fuel economy, it is still Nissan's most fuel-efficient, and Toyota's CVT has never been driven!

The biggest disadvantage of CVT is that it can bear less torque, not to mention the quality of physical materials that avoid the three, Nissan is the softest and the slowest to accelerate, but therefore bears less torque, and the burden on the gearbox is relatively smaller. Look at the Civic 177 horsepower with CVT gearbox, especially because of the turbocharging relationship, the transmission withstands much more torque when the turbo intervenes, although the acceleration is the fastest, but at the same time the transmission is the highest test.

There are a lot of problems with the transmissions of the Nissan Teana and Sylphy, and the Toyota Corolla transmission has a lot of whistling sounds some time ago. At present, there are relatively few examples of Honda having problems, but they are not impossible.

Toyota's CVT gearbox has the best durability.

Toyota's CVT gearbox is stable and durable.

At present, the market has a little higher recognition of Honda's CVT transmission, and not only because of Honda.

Japanese cars like to use naturally aspirated engines and CVT transmissions, mainly because naturally aspirated engines are relatively mature in technology, and fuel-efficient and reliable, can run the farthest distance with the least fuel consumption, and can fully exert fuel economy and power.

Who's in the top three Japanese has the better CVT gearbox.

Honda's CVT gearbox is a little more recognized.

I only use one, which is Nissan's, I think it's okay, especially suitable for traffic jams, it's really smooth, and with the soft shock absorption, thick seats, daily comfort is very high.

My 6AT gearbox is urban, starting, low-speed fuel consumption is really high, casually 2500 rpm, instantaneous fuel consumption of 25-30 liters 100 kilometers. I really don't like it. To save fuel only CVT.

Regardless of the start, it is within 2000 rpm at low speeds. I chose CVT's car for the next time I changed cars.

It may be that I smell the melon, the gearbox, and the CVT should be the best of Nissan.

Aisin's CVT started with gears, which are theoretically the most durable.

Conscience says that the Nissan X-Trail transmission is not good.

Mitsubishi Yige passing by, good car, acceleration express!

The main reason is that the naturally aspirated engine is relatively mature in technology, and it is reliable in fuel economy, can run the farthest distance with the least fuel consumption, and can fully exert fuel economy and power.

My Nissan new Sylphy has taken seven years, and the number of kilometers has only been more than 70,000, and it is time to overhaul the gearbox.

Now the cars are like that, not to mention that the good joint venture cutting corners is also a big push, and it may not be better than the domestic one.

I guess in another 7-8 years a used car with a CVT gearbox will be worthless.

Mine is Mitsubishi with CVT gearbox, I don't know how? Which great god knows?

It is not very clear, and it is recommended that the landlord consult an expert.

It's useless to add so much, so if you're happy, I'll be happy, and if you're happy, I'll too.

AT gearbox, AT variable edge gearbox has strong reliability and is able to withstand large displacements and torques and enginesHowever, it lacks both ride and fuel economy, and the system needs to be upgraded frequently, so the maintenance cost will be relatively high. The CVT is relatively economical, and in terms of shift smoothness, Yin's and CVT are not aimed at anyone, and it is an absolute handle, but this kind of gearbox is mostly used in small displacement cars, and the popularity is not as good as AT.

In terms of the Chinese market, AT is obviously more acceptable than CVT, after all, it is also a "time-honored" technology, but CVT with excellent ride and fuel economy, if it can make a breakthrough in technology in the later stage, it will also be absolutely resounding.

The AT gearbox is more durable, and it is connected to the engine through the torque converter, and the internal dismantling of the torque converter is the transmission oil, and the connection method is a soft connection. The role of the gearbox is:

Change the transmission ratio to meet the needs of traction under different driving conditions;

Realize reversing driving;

When the engine starts, idles, shifts gears or needs to stop for power output, interrupt the power transmission of the old man to drive the Qi wheel of the brigade.

AT gearbox, this gearbox is more durable, and I use this gearbox in my car now, I feel really easy to use.

Compared to the two gearboxes, I feel that the AT gearbox is a bit more durable, and it has a strong conductive performance.

As we all know, Honda is definitely a master in engine research and development, especially in the era of naturally aspirated engines, Honda has created the F20C, K20A, the two naturally aspirated engines in the pinnacle of performance head, Honda's achievements in the field of engines are but in recent years, new technologies bring performance innovation at the same time, but also leave us with the negative impact of very poor reliability, when the quality problems of the DSG dual-clutch transmission are in a uproar, CVT, The Nissan gearbox in the genre appeared low The brand of CVT gearbox used in Honda cars is Honda, haha