How to write the opening argument that medical skills are more important than medical ethics? 20

First of all, my point is that medical skills are just as important as medical ethics. But if I have to choose one or the other, I think medical ethics is more important, the first place. There are several reasons for this:

1. Doctors who do not have medical ethics but have excellent medical skills are more harmful to society. This is actually similar to "sometimes an illiterate person has more negative benefits than an illiterate person". I am not afraid that hooligans are immoral, but I am afraid that hooligans are educated, so if a doctor with excellent medical skills does not pay attention to morality and professional ethics, this situation will be very dangerous and terrible.

2. Ethics is the minimum legal standard. If a person is not moral, it means that he cannot meet even the most basic social requirements. Even if such a person is skilled in medicine, what kind of return and value can he bring to society?

3. Patients' trust in doctors is the basic condition for doctors to practice medicine. If a doctor loses everyone's trust because of his lack of morality, even if he has superb medical skills, it will not help in this case.

4. Lack of medical skills can still be learned. With the development of social economy, the level of medical care is getting higher and higher, and medical talents are becoming more and more outstanding. Society is constantly cultivating highly knowledgeable and capable medical talents, so even if you think that you are superb and invincible, and therefore disregard the law and morality, then such talents are still not worth cherishing.

Every doctor should have a heart of supreme kindness, always have the awe of medicine and the enthusiasm for saving lives. Only in this way can we truly become a truly good doctor who will be remembered in the hearts of the people.

As a doctor who saves lives and helps the wounded, medical skills and medical ethics are equally important and indispensable, so why do we have to say which one of them is important? Medical skills are the fundamental guarantee for saving lives and helping the wounded, and medical ethics is the basic requirement of professional ethics.

Let's start by talking about whether medical ethics are important

"The benevolence of the doctor" is talking about the doctor's medical ethics.

What kind of medical ethics can there be without benevolence? It is the duty of a doctor to save lives and help the wounded. A doctor without medical ethics is more terrible than a professional killer!

Aren't we often seen reports of small hospitals adding money to the procedure? Where is the medical ethics of doctors in such hospitals? If the patient can't come up with the money on the spot, will the incision not be sewn? Isn't this taking advantage of the danger of others to carry out extortion?

In other words, this kind of doctor himself cannot be an all-round doctor. What kind of experience would it be if one day he was also lying on the operating table and was dissected, and then said that he would not pay the money, what would it be like?

Let's talk about whether medical skills are important:

Medical skills are the fundamental skills to save people! Without medical skills, all is empty talk. Medical skills are a key to the health of the patient, and if there is no skilled medical treatment, it is the passage to the ghost gate.

We can't have a dentist go to be a surgeon, and we can't have a dentist go to see other diseases. This is the "specialization in the art industry". The same disease may have different results depending on the level of diagnosis by different doctors.

Some diseases that do not require surgery can be solved with medicine, but there are many doctors who suffer unnecessary pain due to inaccurate control or for the commission of surgical fees and postoperative commissions.

Medical ethics is the basic professional ethics of doctors, while medical skills are the professional level that saves people's lives and guarantees a healthy life, both of which are indispensable.

I think medical ethics are more important, and as a doctor, there is no such thing as good medical ethics. Even if he has good technique, he will use his technique to hurt others.

Having good quality, the second is to look at a person's technical ability. The so-called benevolence of the healer. It means that doctors should have a loving and kind heart.

Good medical ethics is to establish a good medical relationship with the patient, the doctor can understand the patient's pain, and make good technical medical treatment, which may help the patient get out of the pain as soon as possible. Doctors need to know how to comfort patients.

The second is to heal the sick. Some ruthless doctors. I don't understand the pain in the patient's heart, but I just look like I'm very powerful.

Even though the doctor is very skilled, he does not have a good communication relationship with the patient. Patients will also refuse**and cooperate** because of the doctor's bad attitude.

The level of modern medicine is becoming more and more advanced, and the technical level of doctors is uneven, but we should pay more attention to the medical ethics of doctors. has a bad attitude and treats patients with bad words. Or it is cold, this kind of doctor is actually a greater harm to the patient.

I think that medical ethics and medical skills are both important and important, but if I have to compare, I still think that medical ethics is more important. Because a doctor without medical ethics is a cancer that endangers society, he has no compassion, just for his own interests, and in the long run, it is the ordinary people who are most hurt, because in his opinion, interests are supreme, and they will eventually go to the abyss of darkness. On the contrary, a person with medical ethics can have compassion and be able to put himself in the patient's shoes, so naturally he will work hard to solve the problem.

Even if the medical skills are average, they can solve the suffering of patients within the scope of their ability and do not endanger society. Benevolence and benevolence are a good interpretation of the status of medical ethics and medical skills, and only with benevolence can medical skills be transformed into benevolence, and only then can they be able to treat diseases and save people.

Medical ethics and medical ethics are more important. Even if you master one or two medical skills, you will not use them on the right path to save lives and treat diseases. It may be used to blackmail patients and collect money to collect red envelopes.

The profession of a doctor is sacred, selfless dedication, saving lives and helping the wounded, and serving the people wholeheartedly. Without a strong and good work ethic, there is no way to play the technology. It will even harm others and oneself even more.

I think that medical ethics are important, doctors are benevolent, doctors who do not have a correct professional outlook are not considered doctors, even if a person has superb medical skills, but does not form a correct professional outlook, medical ethics are corrupted, even if he lives ten people and kills one person, it should not be said that he is a good doctor, as long as a doctor advocates medical services and works seriously, even if he can only do minor surgeries and see minor diseases, he is also a good doctor who is conscientious.

I think medical ethics is more important, and medical ethics is the embodiment of every doctor's professional ethics. Doctors without medical ethics will not serve the people no matter how good their medical skills are.

Medical skills are very important, and if you don't have good medical skills, you may die. Of course, so is medical ethics.

For doctors, medical ethics are more important. Doctors and doctors are both a profession that saves lives. If a person with bad moral character studies medicine, then one day he meets a sick person, and he can't cure it, but in order to get the patient's medical expenses, he will.

Prescribing to the patient has no effect, which will harm the patient's condition. Tang Sun Simiao's "Great Doctor's Sincerity" proposes that a doctor must meet two conditions. The first is refinement, that is, doctors are required to have exquisite medical skills, believing that medical Tao is "the most subtle and subtle thing", and those who practice medicine must be "extremely knowledgeable and diligent and tireless".

The second is sincerity, that is, the doctor is required to have a noble moral cultivation, with the heart of empathy for "seeing the suffering of others, as if he has it", and then vowing to "save the suffering of the soul", and not to "be self-righteous and happy, invite reputation", "rely on one's own strengths, and take advantage of one's wealth".

Qiu Fazu, the founder of Chinese surgery: "Those who are not close to the Buddha cannot be doctors, and those who are not close to immortals cannot be doctors." "For medical workers, morality is the foundation of life, and only then is it an aid, and both are indispensable.

Virtuous and untalented will only do bad things with good intentions, and talented but unvirtuous people are the main group of people in today's society. Technology can be learned, where to pick it up if the virtue is gone?

In my personal experience, most of the doctors I met would rub their hands hot before palpating in winter, and when they encountered patients with bad tempers, they would patiently wait until the patient's mood was stable before communicating. So sometimes some small problems, encounter virtuous but not skilled doctors, **inappropriate, I can be tolerated, and I am willing to cooperate again**, after all, I personally think that there are not many virtuous and talented, and the majority of those who are not skilled are not proficient, but fortunately, those who are not skilled generally cannot be alone, and are managed by those who have both ability and political integrity. . . A doctor without virtue and talent....I heard from a friend (who sells medicine) that many young people now go to private hospitals for abortions or something, and the cost of going to the examination and negotiation is not high, until they get on the operating table, they start to say that they are infected or something, and at this time you are already on the operating table, and you have to sign it.

It is tens of thousands to be owed. I feel that this kind of person is also talented and not virtuous.

Medical ethics are important, and some doctors in today's society are mercenary, using the doctor's profession to extort money, and using the profession to do some dirty deeds, which is shameful.

Objectively speaking, medical ethics and medical skills are very important, and no one can do without them. Medical ethics are not good, I just want to cheat money, and no matter how good my medical skills are, I will be blind. On the basis of certain medical ethics, we can further talk about the medical skills of doctors.

But just having medical ethics and no medical skills, of course, is not good, after all, everyone is very busy, and whoever goes to the hospital is not nonsense with the doctor. Solving problems is king. As the saying goes, a cat that can't catch mice is not a good cat A doctor who can't see a doctor...

From ancient times to the present, all walks of life have paid attention to "having both ability and political integrity, and taking morality as the first". You might as well recall that when I was in school, education said that "morality, intelligence, physical fitness, aesthetics, and labor" developed in an all-round way. Let's take a look at the examination and evaluation of state civil servants, what they talk about is "morality, ability, diligence, and honesty," and "morality" is also the priority.

The appointment of talents in various industries, especially management talents, pays more attention to "having both ability and political integrity, and putting morality first" since this is a law and a principle, and it is the worldview, outlook on life and values that most people in China have agreed with for 5,000 years. So let's agree. Therefore, medical ethics and medical skills are both very important, equally important.

If you have to take it out and say that it is more important, let's put medical ethics in front of medical skills. There must be nothing wrong, at least not for 100 years.

Medical ethics is more important, medical ethics is like human morality, only when people have morality will they be good people.

Hello: I think medical ethics are important, because medical skills are important, but compared with medical ethics, medical ethics is more important, only if medical ethics are good, will you become a doctor worthy of respect!

That's why I think medical ethics are important! Hope it helps, hope, thank you!

The first stage of medical skills.

Originally, I thought that medical skills are absolutely the first, because since it is the doctor who sees the patient and sees the disease, this is absolutely the first, no matter how good your medical ethics are, the medical skills are not refined. If you can't solve the problem for the patient, what is the point of the patient in the end? This was the first stage of my understanding of medical ethics.

Good attitude in the second stage.

Later, many patients asked not only that you could cure their illness, but also that you care about their people.

The hospital often has such doctors, and the medical level is average, but every one of his patients is very grateful to him.

There are even some patients who are not optimistic about their illness, and they are seriously ill, and they are very grateful

At first, I didn't like such a doctor very much, but as I grew older and communicated with my family, I felt that such a doctor was also a good doctor, at least the patient and his family thought that he was definitely a good doctor.

Especially in days when the doctor-patient relationship is strained, safety is definitely the first priority.

Therefore, satisfying patients is definitely a manifestation of medical ethics, which is the second place I know about medical ethics.

Medical ethics includes the third stage, but it is not the only one.

With a serious illness, I was really helpless at that time, because I was a doctor, I found many doctors to see me, but I didn't get a diagnosis.

The twists and turns I experienced in the middle pointed to malignant lymphoma at that time, and I thought that my time was running out, but fortunately, after doing pathology, I was sure that I had tuberculosis.

During those days, it was really lonely and lonely, and it was the greetings of my friends and the comfort of the doctor that allowed me to get through those days.

Later, after confirming that I had tuberculosis, looking back on that period of time, I felt that comfort was definitely a manifestation of medical ethics, which made my understanding of medical ethics enter the third stage.

Medical ethics in my heart.

Now I think that the so-called medical ethics, medical skills are definitely an important part of medical ethics, but they are not the only manifestation.

The performance of medical ethics must have superb medical skills to cure patients within the scope of competence and in the course of current medical methods.

At the same time, in the process of caring for patients and comforting their families, they are all included in medical ethics, and both are indispensable.

If the patient is not satisfied, the family is not satisfied, and sometimes there will be misunderstandings about the doctor, and both parties will lose the situation. Although the disease is cured, there is no harmony in social relations, but the human heart is sick, which is definitely not a manifestation of medical ethics.

If the doctor cares about the patient in every way, but the disease that can be cured is delayed, the patient is tormented by the disease, and the people and money are left with endless pain to the relatives and the patient himself, what is the use of your good attitude?

The medical skills are superb, and at the same time the patient is highly responsible, the attitude is kind, the explanation is patient, and I can really do this, I definitely think that this is a doctor with high medical ethics.