How is the Sony A200 for beginners to get started, and I hope that veterans will guide you

Pros:1Cost-effective, with the price and quality of the set, it can completely kill any mainstream digital camera at present.

Stabilization, I like this.

Other advantages will be added later when I think about them.

4.Fast focusing speed with a lens of 18-70 Cons: 1The camera performance is not satisfactory; The workmanship and picture quality are not as good as those of Canon and Nikon.

2.The eyepiece viewfinder is relatively small, not as wide as the A700, A300, A350 have an LCD viewfinder function, and the eyepiece viewfinder is small to understand, 3The lens equipped with the 75-300 feels very frustrated, with slow focusing and no macro function.

4.Summary: Sony can consider launching a new set of machines, the price of double heads, and the camera matching lens can use a single lens 18-105 with better workmanship, which is more conducive to beginners.

Hehe, it's similar to the situation when I first purchased the machine.

Help you analyze it.

The high-end DC you used before can be used as an attachment machine. And since I am studying photography, it is recommended to consider it carefully. It's best to go straight to the mid-range SLR.

First 450d

The dog's head has to be about 4500, which is okay in Canon's entry-level SLR. If you have sufficient funds, you will be able to do so. The disadvantage is that there will be more investment in the later stage, there is no body stabilization, (the anti-shake head is not cheap) I won't say much about the rest, I guess you know.

The D60 doesn't seem to have a fuselage motor, so it will be very inconvenient to use. **Also slightly higher. Personally, not recommended.

If you want to buy these two, let's be honest, such as saving some more money to buy a D80 or a D90 that has just been launched.

And then there's the A200, no, it's the most cost-effective. I bought it, I haven't regretted it, the manual function is complete, the imaging is sharp, and the color temperature can be adjusted so far. The machine is also very fashionable.

Enough to play. (It is very suitable for poor students like us, and it is definitely worthy of more than 3,000 **!) I bought it after thinking about it for a long time.

I am a student at the Academy of Fine Arts. I am also a photography enthusiast and have been playing with film cameras before. This machine is enough for me. It felt okay. The disadvantage is that there are not as many continuous shots as said on the Internet, only about Zhang.

You know, there is no such thing as the best, only the best for yourself.

I'm not going to copy things from east to west. You can check it out more. Parameters and everything are available on the Internet. It's all about the point. Depending on your funds, choose for yourself.

By the way, I will help you quote a price.

My A200

Chongqing 08 at the end of the hand.

3300 single set of headband tickets can be easily won.

Get a machine bag and a cleaning tool.

After playing for so long, I hope it will help you.

I'm not engaged in photography and I don't talk about which brand is how A200 I bought a single set As far as the people are concerned, it is enough Of course, there are also people who say no, so cheap** has very practical functions Whether it is entry or further study, there is a lot of space As for the phase, I don't understand, I can only say that the adjustable range is very large For its potential, you need to tap it yourself, basically this machine is the right to this** and brand! Take it out and be classy!

What I'm going to say is, since you have a limited budget, without exceeding the scope of your ability, compare the few digital things you want to buy, there is no perfect thing, all of them are perfect, where does the manufacturer get the money to make!

I see a lot of people using sky-high equipment to determine their status! Wrong! If the technique is poor, if you take tens of thousands of pianos, no matter how you play them, you can't play the value of the piano!

This is a common principle

People's social positions are different, I hope everyone finds their own way to go, and the last thing to hurt is yourself!

..Let's enter the S family.

I especially hate people who talk about reading reviews.

I haven't used it myself. Looking at the samples of several cameras, I said 3 and 4....

It's not much worse anyway.

Neither is an absolute advantage over the other. There is no absolute disadvantage.

eos1000d...3400...

d60 3600,a200 3060...

You just think about it.

Out of the film. Camera performance accounts for only 30%-40%...It's up to you.

I'm using the A300 and I'm not satisfied with the imaging, let alone the A200 ......ISO to 400 and the noise ......Plus the chicken-ribbed flash height ......

Compared to the Nikon D60, I recommend the Canon 450D, which is more cost-effective.

Also, the pullover of that A200 is really ......

There are a lot of post-processing of the so-called A200 on ......the Internet, so it is good to see it clearly

It is recommended not to look at Sony, our Sony dealers themselves say that the A series of machines are not sold, for fear of obvious problems every day to find things to do their own business, and then kick to Canon! The 450d I bought, the set is nothing more than 4700, not much more expensive!

Beginner-speaking, A200 is enough, if you need real-time viewing, then you can also choose A300 or A350, you can't trust all the things on the Internet, and the authors of the reviews are some photography masters or people who have been in contact with a lot of SLRs! It is recommended that the landlord go to the physical store to experience the feeling of the real machine, and if you can't test shoot, you can at least take it in your hand to experience the next weight, look at the viewfinder and button distribution, etc.!

I use the A300 double head cover and nothing bad about it. I just like the power of Sony, and I don't ink a lot of A200 features. Fit is the best, listen to those bricks.

A200 picture quality and pullover is really meaty, pullover quality in the SLR of various brands is the second! It's really not suitable for students to get started.,Sooner or later, you'll change to the expensive lens of the S family because of the unsatisfactory picture quality of the set.,And in the same kind of quality lens,The price of the S family is extremely low! It is recommended that you consider Pentax K200 KM, Oba E420, the landlord may wish to take a look at the set of samples and comparative evaluations on the Internet before making a move!

To be honest, my major is similar to yours, I bought the A200 at the beginning of '07

At the beginning, the budget was 4000-5500, and I took a fancy to three, Canon 400D, Nikon D60, Sony A200At the beginning, I was most optimistic about Canon, but I chose A200 under the principle of saving money for my family.

Now let's talk about some of the A200's flaws (a word for the family, please don't laugh at it):

1.The image quality is relatively poor, and the color is not very good (the price point dictate)2The flash height is low.

3.The weight is heavy.

4.It doesn't look very good.

Canon and Nikon are relatively recommended, although they are expensive, but the imaging quality is ***, and the province regrets it.

I bought the A200 and have been using it for 3 months and it feels great!

Very worthy of this**!!

Don't listen to other people's nonsense, you go to the store and try it yourself, and you will understand everything after a few test shots, and most of the people who can't say it are Canon and Nikon people!

What do digital cameras use to image? CCD, of course, but who invented CCD, and who in the world can make CCD at present?

Is it only Sony? Panasonic also mastered this technique later.

Trust me and buy it! If you don't believe it, forget it, (if you are not satisfied, come to my house and lend you my A200 for 1 month, and you will decide after you are satisfied).

Hello for your inquiry; The Sony A200 is a DSLR camera released in 2008, and here is a tutorial on how to use it:1Install the battery and memory card

Insert the battery into the battery compartment on the bottom of the camera. Insert the memory card into the memory card slot on the side of the camera. Type Tan 2

Attaching the lens: Follow the instructions in the camera manual to attach and remove the lens. 3.

Power on the camera: Press the switch on the top of the camera to power on the camera. 4.

Set camera parameters: Press the "Menu" button next to the display on the back of the camera to enter the menu interface and set the camera parameters, such as ISO, shutter speed, aperture, etc. 5.

Focus: Point the camera at the object you want to shoot and focus through the focus point in the camera's viewfinder. 6.

Shooting**: Press the shutter button at the top of the camera to shoot**. 7.

Connect to the computer: Use the data cable that comes with the camera, connect the camera to the computer, and import ** to the computer for saving and. The above is the basic tutorial of Sony A200, which needs to be further learned and operated according to the actual situation and camera manual.

Pros: Cheap, the single body is not as expensive as ordinary DC, the CCD displacement anti-shake effect is much better than I imagined, and the anti-shake effect is quite reliable. The size design is good (the size is one circle larger than the D60), and the grip feels more suitable.

Cons: Workmanship! Work!

How did Sony come up with such a shoddy thing, the fuselage is simply made of ** waste plastic, especially the sleeve, the materials can't be compared with Nikon D60 at all, and the dial wheel and hot shoe interface have no texture at all. The body size is large and lighter than other brands of similar machines, and Sony may think that it helps with stabilization, but it does reduce the texture of the whole machine.

No focus auxiliary light summary: Look at the previous leo731's evaluation is a bit too harsh;

It's really unreasonable to have no focus assist light;

It is understandable that there is no reflector pre-upgrade, not to mention the entry machine even Nikon D80

The 90 does not have a reflector pre-rise, which is also Canon's machine with this, but Canon's entry camera (450D) is better than the A200

Everyone knows how expensive the D60 is, and perhaps Sony confidently believes that the body stabilization is enough to offset the vibration of the reflector;

There's no depth preview, all I can say is that you're finding fault, and depth preview is really useless on digital cameras. Because modern cameras are full open aperture framing and metering, so the depth of field range seen is the range under the full open aperture, unless you are shooting with the maximum aperture, otherwise the depth of field range you see when framing will be shallower than what you actually shoot, in order to be able to see the actual depth of field, the camera has a device for shrinking the aperture, called the depth of field preview, and in fact, after the aperture is narrowed, the viewfinder screen is dark, and basically can't see anything, so the use value is not great, and the veteran does not need to look at it, the depth of field is probably more or less in mind. In the digital age, novices don't need to look at it, it's better to take a picture and take a closer look on the LCD!

Do you say yes? All in all.

There is no focus assist light, the rough workmanship is unacceptable to me, this camera is not for me, I will not buy it. But let's be honest, this machine is really worth the money. People who don't want to spend more money and want to know what the SLR is all about are worth choosing.