Why the higher the education, the more cowardly people are

Two reasons: 1, people who have read a lot of sage books generally have a high level of cultivation and are unwilling to provoke right and wrong, do not like to do things with others, endure if they can, and solve peacefully if they can solve it peacefully, so they appear cowardly.

2. Those who wear shoes are afraid of being barefoot. After studying for so many years and spending so much effort, they don't want to waste so many years of hard work for a little thing, so they can't seem to be open to some things.

Knowledge makes people think, and the more they think, the easier it is to look ahead and look backward. Therefore, the higher the education, the more courageous and cowardly people appear.

And some so-called big old people are more likely to be impulsive. And to make a decision ...

Therefore, cultural people, many times, they just come up with an idea, be a staff officer, a military advisor or something. And the person who makes the decision is likely to be less educated.

I don't feel it, I think people who enter society very early are more cowardly, just look at the current crooked tendencies. This cowardice is not "not daring", but a shameful "bravery", daring to do anything that is beneficial to oneself, regardless of conscience. People with high academic qualifications may seem a little wooden, which makes people feel that they lack personality, but at least they don't have so many bad intentions.

In addition, this lack of individuality is more responsible for the environmental impact of China's education system and society, and when we Chinese want to be as developed as the Yankees, everyone can show off their personality, and Japan is a good example.

The more single the psychological fulcrum, the more you are harmed by the phrase "only reading is high".

Maybe LZ misunderstands the word cowardice.

I don't think so. Sometimes you feel brave.

But maybe it's just recklessness.

From the perspective of academic qualifications themselves, the inversion of academic qualifications is not necessarily a waste of talents.

Because academic qualifications do not fully represent a person's abilities and potential. Many talents, especially in the field of practice, may not be able to obtain a high degree due to other factors, but they have accumulated valuable experience and skills in practice, and have achieved excellent performance and achievements, resulting in high-level positions. At this point, a low level of education is not a measure of their ability.

Of course, if the reason for the upside down academic qualifications is that the low level of education leads to the inability to meet the requirements of the position, then it is a waste of talents. In today's highly competitive workplace, academic qualifications are only a state-type reference factor, but not the only determining factor. Enterprises should pay attention to the actual ability and performance of talents, and give corresponding positions and treatments to achieve full play of talents.

Now the social selection standards are actually constantly adjusting and changing, the influencing factors of academic qualifications are gradually declining, and the trend of diversified standards is rising, that is, it is difficult to find one or several key indicators, but it is undeniable that academic qualifications are still the threshold line of rotten oak. Because if there is no such threshold, then the recruiter will not be able to control the number of people fairly. But after working, when promoted, it is also helpful, the size of its role depends on the leader's understanding or experience of academic qualifications, if the leader is a doctorate, then it is easy to do, and the doctorate must be high in his weight.

On the contrary, it is relatively low. So it can't be generalized. People with the same experience are more likely to be recognized and appreciated, and people with the same background are more likely to understand each other.

Employing standards, from scores, age, education, and background, these relatively clear things to abstract things such as ability, quality, and emotional intelligence actually change, but it is undeniable that the clearer the standard, the easier it is to be fair, and the more abstract things are, the easier it is to be used.

Everyone knows that academic qualifications are not only helpful in themselves, but the resources of teachers and classmates hidden behind can sometimes play a huge role. This point must not be underestimated, maybe you think that this is a matter of our understanding, then I will give you an example, you will definitely understand more deeply and thoroughly. In the cross talk world, famous teachers are extremely influential, many actors are not famous, not because of their ability, but because they have no chance, why some can do it, the key is that one teacher is not good, so worship the second one, some big famous teachers do not accept other people's apprentices, but many teachers are not famous, so those who are smart will apprentice, a few more teachers, and there is not much cost, but they can bring themselves a lot of unexpected resources.

Of course, it is enough for a famous teacher to meet one, and a teacher to meet one. It is really not easy to meet good Bole and famous teachers. Be sure to cherish it.

Through longitudinal comparison, we find that when young people enter the workforce, the importance of academic qualifications is becoming less and less. In the final analysis, whether a person can make a certain contribution to the company has little to do with academic qualifications, mainly depends on work ability. Another theory is that academic qualifications are becoming more and more important as society develops.

This is also an important reason for the rising number of graduate students in recent years, and the depreciation of Shiran academic qualifications seems to have become more and more serious.

Some people enter the workforce and think that academic qualifications are becoming less and less important. But when it comes to job hunting, academic qualifications are a key stepping stone. To a certain extent, it represents our ability to study or work, and a good academic qualification can give us the opportunity to enter a better platform.

When recruiting, large companies will also give priority to students from prestigious schools or talents with higher academic qualifications. Because a good academic qualification is, to a certain extent, a reflection of a person's learning ability. People with good learning ability can also make faster progress in their work.

If you can, it is also a good choice to work hard to improve your academic qualifications. The importance of academic qualifications can be seen from this, so it is wrong to say that academic qualifications are not important.

When we enter the workplace, our development depends on our ability to work, and has nothing to do with our academic qualifications. The size of a person's contribution to the company has nothing to do with academic qualifications, but is reflected by work ability. Many people have no interest in learning when they go to school, so their studies are average, and the final academic qualifications they obtain are also average.

But the ability to handle things at work is very outstanding, and he is comfortable in the workplace. Academic qualifications may be relatively important when applying for a job. But after entering the workplace, when we have a certain amount of work experience, the importance of academic qualifications is not so obvious.

<> academic qualifications are upside down. The term academic inversion is unfamiliar, but it actually refers to people who have high professional skills but do not have the corresponding academic qualifications. They are often undervalued in the workplace, limited in their career advancement, and even discriminated against.

I believe that this phenomenon is a waste of talents, which affects their development and restricts the progress of society.

Why is this happening? In fact, it is very simple, because many people feel that academic qualifications are the only criterion for evaluating talents. They think that having a degree is the only way to prove that you have a certain vocational ability.

However, this perception is not entirely correct, in fact, practical experience and professional skills are the most important.

It is not uncommon to see people who excel at work but have limited their career development because they do not have the relevant academic qualifications. The actual work ability and experience of these people are neglected, resulting in a waste of human resources. This situation is very unfair because their abilities are not being fully utilized.

In addition, the inversion of academic qualifications will also restrict the development of talents. Some positions and industries have clear requirements for academic qualifications, and if you don't have the corresponding academic qualifications, it is difficult to be promoted to a higher position, and it is difficult to get a better salary and benefits. This will make many excellent talents unable to realize their own value, because academic qualifications have become the only evaluation criteria.

Finally, the inversion of academic qualifications can also affect the progress of society. In order to promote the progress of society, more talents are needed, and these talents are often interdisciplinary and cross-field. If we only pay attention to academic qualifications and ignore practical ability and experience, many talents will be neglected, which will affect the development and progress of society.

Academic qualifications are a waste of talents, and we should pay more attention to the actual ability and experience of talents, rather than just academic qualifications. Only in this way can we give full play to the potential of our talents and promote the progress of society.

In order to avoid the phenomenon of inverted academic qualifications, we can take the following measures:

1.Vocational skills certification system: Establish a vocational skills certification system, evaluate vocational skills through examinations or practical work experience, and give corresponding certificates.

2.Recognition of practical experience: For some industries, practical experience is more important than academic qualifications, so practical experience can be weighted more in recruitment and promotion, so that those with practical experience can get more opportunities.

3.Improve social recognition: Through the publicity and promotion of successful cases, more people will realize that academic qualifications are not the only criterion for evaluating talents, so that society can treat those talents who do not have relevant academic qualifications but have actual vocational skills more fairly.

To sum up, the key to preventing the inversion of academic qualifications lies in changing the social evaluation criteria for talents and focusing on practical ability and experience. Only in this way can those who do not have relevant academic qualifications but have practical vocational skills be fully developed and duly respected.

Study well, and become a good student's original god to clear the sin?

Don't recruit children with low education anymore, wild children are too easy to expand with the development of the enterprise, or have to recruit children with high education, this sentence of good mentality is Zhang Lan's recent speech, which also makes the word "good student mentality" be hyped. There is even a "group of victims of the mentality of good students" in a certain ** group. I took some look at the group and came up with a very strange point:

First of all, as I said at the beginning, this group describes learning as a human being. Then, when they saw the 996 that is prevalent in the Internet industry, they thought that the reason why these people were suffering was because they studied too hard in school and turned themselves into good students. In my opinion, the idea of having these people is either stupid or bad.

These thoughts of theirs are a kind of reverse contempt for good students, and subconsciously instill in people a theory of the uselessness of learning. It is reminiscent of: "Learning well can only be exchanged for 996 in the end, and only working hard to complete KPI OKRs".

The annoying thing is that this view is still very easy to accept, no matter what position this person is in, he can always think of a few "good students" who are not good, so such an erroneous view turned out to be a tiger for three people. What I would say is that there is a very big fallacy in this view of seeping, and they attribute a very common social phenomenon or social phenomena to good students. As everyone knows, 360 lines, most industries may have overtime, and PUA is also common in some jobs.

But this is never exclusive to good students, on the contrary, these good students of 996 are still paid a good salary, although they are miserable. Compared with some civil engineering brothers and friends who go to deliver food in a recession, good students are in an advantageous position. Partial generalizations like this are harmful.

For adults, these views are nothing more than fun, but many minors also have the wrong empathy, and they are always more receptive to these views than adults. Once minors accept these views and treat their studies with the wrong attitude, then when they regret it and bear the consequences, it will probably be more than ten years later, and they will not even have a chance to correct themselves.

Nothing is absolute.

People with a lower education level than themselves are not necessarily poor in ability and low in emotional intelligence, and many people are not highly educated, but they are highly capable, have high emotional intelligence, and are favored and liked by many people. Therefore, a low culture should not be an obstacle to making friends and falling in love.

It is often said that academic qualifications are not equal to ability, and knowledge is not equal to wisdom. Academic qualifications are the effect, and the self-discipline, persistence and resilience behind academic qualifications are the causes; Wisdom is the effect, the process of learning and using knowledge, the process of turning knowledge into cognition, and rising to wisdom is the cause.

What ordinary people see is academic qualifications, and what wise people see is the essence of self-discipline, perseverance and resilience behind academic qualifications, and academic qualifications are just appearances.

It is true that most people with high education are more capable, but this is not brought about by his high education, but by the character traits of self-discipline, perseverance and resilience behind high education. That is to say, if a person does not have a higher education, but he has the character traits of self-discipline, perseverance and resilience, he will also achieve greater success and better results. On the contrary, a person has a relatively high education, but he has no self-discipline, perseverance and tenacity, and these character traits are often in vain and achieve nothing.

With people with low academic qualifications, there should be early communication, suitable or not, and the three views are not caused by academic qualifications, but are related to the environment, talent, and hard work we are in, because in the process of receiving education, the ability of two people is almost the same, unless one is particularly smart. Falling in love is not just about literacy, but about emotional interaction and shared interests, experiences, and values. These are the most important things, and in reality, many people ignore this and regard education as the key criterion for making friends.

Making friends with people with low educational qualifications depends on the person's ideological and educational background. Because many people do not have a higher education, but they have a wealth of life and work experience. These experiences can make people more mature and stronger, and such people may know how to deal with interpersonal relationships, and know how to interact and communicate better.

It is necessary to be more concerned with the person's character and personality, the quality of life, and these qualities determine a person's true character.

When two people fall in love, the level of education can not be the determining factor, we should pay attention to the character, quality, interests and common values of the person, the emotional foundation of two people, and the choice of partner should be mutually willing, equal, free and unconditional.