The meaning of a relationship that exists for me and its essential characteristics

If I don't tell you, go and ask Guanyin.

One is that he is not in this world because you were born in this world, and the other is that he is in this world in the first place, and he continues to exist for you.

Other words. He is genuine to you.

There is a meaning that you don't marry, and you don't marry.

His heart lives only for you.

Even if you don't choose him or her

He was married to someone else.

He's just living together.

I still love you in my heart.

It means that there is only you in my heart, I care about you, and I like you.

He will always stay for you and will always be with you. Holding your hand will never let go, holding your heart will never be separated. Where there is you, there is nature.

I love each other deeply, that is, well, people who love each other very much.

A love sentence, the speaker has ulterior motives, listen to their own attention.

We can completely stipulate a basis for the study of value at the level of mentalism, that is, to understand value as a spiritual phenomenon produced by the human brain, which is ultimately the function of the material and natural world, and the relationship between the subject and the object is also the functional relationship of the natural world. But I don't know what laws and inevitable structures the phenomenon of value has in its right to be enshrined in a special field. Marx said, "Wherever there is a certain relation, it exists for me." "If the eye is only focused on the relationship and forgets the "self-nature" of the relationship, it is a naturalistic vision.

This "self-nature" cannot be mentalistic as the meaning of the object to me, as if the "I" is a psychological entity, the bearer of meaning, but from a phenomenological point of view, before distinguishing between subject and object, I see myself in the object, or understand the object as myself. We have comprehended a world of meaning before we are understood as a being in nature, before we are understood as a "subject" in a relationship, and before we are theoretically seen as a receptor and verifier of a certain value.

It doesn't make much sense. Existence should be objective, and it is not subject to human will. If we are an objective being, no matter how much change is always an objective existence.

Therefore, there is no recognition of its objective existence and denial of its non-objective existence in the same time and space. This is similar to the paradoxical story.

Between my life and heaven and earth, where there is my role, I exist, and where I am useless, my place is still dead.

Existence itself has no meaning, because it is void, but within the realm of existence (time and space), what happens relatively, and if we can not be troubled by existence, existence itself is a vast experience.

Everything comes from nothing. What is the root, what is the real world, are we in the world There is a world that has me, or has I have the world.

Who we are, we exist here and now, and we don't exist here and now, so we are infigurable.

Everything has meaning because its opposites exist.

Singing: Fang Jing.

Song Title: For You.

Hope it helps!

Sometimes it's sweet, sometimes it's sad, and I always love to be alone in a daze.

Tolerance Magnanimity is strict with oneself and lenient with others: be strict with oneself and be tolerant of others.