-
1. If you are doing practical work, you only need to remember some prohibitive legal provisions, and for general regulations, you only need to know that there is such a thing, and then look for the provisions when you encounter them, so that you can slowly remember them.
2. If you are going to use it for the exam, it must be accurate, although the exam generally does not test the original text of the article, but will ask questions on details such as "may" and "should". This requires memorizing these key rules in a targeted manner, but you don't have to memorize them from beginning to end, remember the key points, and then familiarize yourself with and understand them, and soon you will find the trick that suits you. I'll help you get to know it:
The law is the most comprehensive, its language has been carefully scrutinized by legal experts, extremely rigorous, if you feel that the law you memorize omits a certain aspect of the interest, then you must be wrong!! Hope it helps!!
-
It is best to have a cycle and repeat memory (such as repeating once a week, slowly extending the memory cycle, and it is difficult to forget), otherwise I will remember it again after a month!!
-
There are many legal provisions that do not need to be memorized, so it is easier to remember them by picking out the key points first, and then using cases to deepen your understanding.
-
Practice makes perfect, see more cases The key is to persevere, you can't fish for three days and dry nets for two days.
If you're in forensics, then congratulations, you've gained a valuable asset.
-
Understand the notes, contact the cases, and remember solidly.
-
First of all: 1. The specific items do not need to be known; 2. In principle, it is not necessary to memorize the specific penalties such as the number of years to be sentenced in the criminal law; 3. The view article should pay attention to the systematic, not only understand one article in isolation, the relevant provisions, the opposite provisions, the provisions that belong to a system, etc., must be understood and compared systematically as a whole, and even to understand the legislative purpose, the original intent of the legislation, etc.! 4. When answering questions, it is generally said that "according to the provisions of relevant laws and regulations, it can be known:
It is sufficient to vaguely replace it, without saying "according to the number of articles of the "XX Law". 5. When answering questions and writing the legal basis, you only need to express the core meaning in your own words, and you don't need to use the original words. 6. Laws and regulations (laws) are the most authoritative basis; It is not enough to memorize the law, and memorization can only be regarded as a basic skill; The law needs to be combined with the analysis and theory in the Guide, and it should be combined with specific cases to understand thoroughly!!
7. A person who does not know what the law is or has never seen the law at all is unlikely to be admitted to the Master of Law.
The memorization of legal provisions is definitely not for you to memorize, let alone to memorize them, which requires comprehensive analysis, and is "memory and application on the basis of understanding".
Grasp the content of the law as a whole, summarize it into your own things, break through the key difficulties and details, and associate the relevant laws and theories.
1) the right to vote and the right to stand for election;
2) The right to freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration;
3) The right to hold positions in state organs;
4) The right to hold leadership positions in state-owned companies, enterprises, public institutions, and people's organizations.
Read the law once and move on to the four-step process.
Step 1: Overall grasp (whole).
This article can be boiled down to "the content of deprivation of political rights", which is also the name of a knowledge point and a test point.
Step 2: Summarize (coarse).
It can also be summed up simply: "Elections; Freely; Organ; State-owned" This can appropriately simplify the memory and reduce the amount of memory.
Step 3: Break through the key difficulties (detail) A: It is not allowed to hold "any" position in a state organ.
It is not possible to be a leader, nor is it possible to be a general staff member; B: There are two restrictions on holding positions in companies, enterprises, public institutions and people's organizations, not only state-owned units, but also leadership positions.
Lenovo: It turns out that the so-called knowledge points are well understood, and this is the reason for drawing inferences!!
Step 4: Relevant knowledge association.
The scope of state organs, the meaning of political rights and freedoms (involving the content of the Constitution), the scope of people's organizations (involving knowledge of civil law and the Constitution), and the classification of legal persons (involving the content of civil law) all need to be grasped one by one, they are interlocking, and now the topics for directly testing the law (basically everyone can do it) are gradually decreasing, and the topics that cross the law and the topics that involve the theory behind the law are increasing, which means that the depth of difficulty is also increasing.
For the above four steps, don't apply them mechanically, use them flexibly, and form your own ideas!!
-
Buy two copies of the same laws and regulations, don't be afraid to spend money, if you can borrow someone who has already used it, it is even better.
Use correction tape to cover out the drawn parts.
Then Fu Rufu used this covered law and regulation to memorize, can know the content of the coverage, explain that it has been mastered, and if you don't know, use another book to compare, so that you can deepen your memory.
This is done three times in a row, and you can basically memorize it.
This has the advantage of reducing boredom, avoiding the dullness and dazzle of thinking when looking at the clockwork for a long time, and can improve efficiency.
Dealing with the bar exam is a systematic project, and this article is only aimed at the boring memorization of legal provisions.
-
Hello: Reciting the text of the law is the same as the ordinary Fang Shoutong Law that we remember. Reading it a thousand times is the best way.
The frequently used provisions are naturally familiar. I also used to memorize some provisions by rote because of the needs of the case, but Zheng Jutan was very clear in a short period of time, and after a long time, he didn't need it, so he naturally forgot about it.
-
There are red-skinned legal books with cases in the market, and the cases are relatively short and simple, which can deepen your understanding after reading them, and can help you remember. It should be sold next to the China Legal Publishing House or the Legal Rubber Publishing House.
Legal norms are different from legal provisions, legal norms are the content of legal provisions, and legal provisions are the manifestation of legal norms. Legal norms are the main content of legal provisions. The content of the legal text may also include other elements of law. >>>More
It's best to find a regular Beijing Zhenghe to do it, and the most important thing is to look at technology and strength. From the perspective of Beijing Zhenghe, Beijing Zhenghe is a local enterprise, and it is necessary to rest assured when going to a regular hospital 010-60748000
In the event that the recipient breaches the contract, refuses to perform, or is unable to perform the contract, or revokes or terminates the contract and fails to fully perform the main debt of the contract, the advance payment shall be refunded. >>>More
Penalty for breach of contract.
Article 122 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law provides that if another person obtains improper benefits without legal basis, the person who has suffered losses has the right to request the return of the improper benefits. This article clarifies the legal effect that the unjust enricher has the obligation to return to the person whose interests have been damaged, and that the person whose interests have been damaged has the right to request the return of the unjust enrichment from the unjust enricher, and also clarifies the three basic constituent elements that "there is no legal basis for the gainer to gain", "the interests of the other party suffers losses", and "there is a causal connection between the benefits obtained by the gainer and the loss of interests of the other party".