Does war promote or destroy the productive forces?

To a large extent, war is a necessary stage to promote the development of all aspects of human society, and many things in various social systems have also been embodied and perfected through war, from the Stone Age to the Bronze Age, from the Cold Weapon Age to the current information strategy age. This not only increases combat efficiency, but also greatly increases productivity.

For a very simple example, Ford's assembly line production technology was still very imperfect from the late 19th century to the early 20th century, although it is a fact to increase productivity, but it has not reached a great extent, and the national production of World War II has perfected this set of technology, which has also indirectly made the United States always walk in the first line of industrial powers in the next hundred years.

Personally, I don't see war and peace as contradictory"The momentum of the world will be divided for a long time, and it will be divided for a long time"It is only a matter of stage, although from the official polite words, we should avoid war and advocate peace. But war is inevitable, and it means that people are hungry if they don't eat, and they have to pull when they're full.

The above is purely a personal opinion, I hope you are satisfied.

The boost that comes with the war is absolute.

To a certain extent, war promotes the development of science and technology.

Forcing humanity to develop technologies.

Forcing a country to progress.

It also develops productive forces and promotes social progress.

The devastation brought about by war is relative.

The devastation caused by war is nothing compared to the progress it has caused.

Think about the history of China, the Tang Dynasty was prosperous, and the situation at home and abroad was very good.

Although the people's lives are rich, there is not much development.

Think about the outbreak of World War II to the present.

How much has human science and technology developed.

So I think war actually promotes productivity.

War destroys productivity.

What is the purpose of the development of the productive forces?

For the happiness of mankind.

What if war boosts productivity? He destroys the happiness of mankind.

What is the significance of this facilitation?

Some people always say that we must make progress and progress at all costs.

But when is it a head? And the end is in**?

Since there is no end point, isn't it putting the cart before the horse to promote progress at the cost of war?

Therefore, the so-called war to promote productive forces is nothing more than the rhetoric of some people with ulterior motives, which is as ridiculous as "Genghis Khan objectively expanded the territory of China".

War can promote the development of productive forces or hinder their development. The new class uses war to overthrow the old class, smash the old state apparatus, establish new relations of production, and develop the productive forces. Such as the October Revolution.

At the same time, foreign wars can expand domestic demand and promote the development of industry and agriculture because they consume a large amount of materials. However, if the war takes too long, it will deplete the national treasury and reduce domestic investment

First of all, the war will lead to the destruction of many industrial facilities, factories.

Second, due to the needs of the war, many industries were forced to pay heavy taxes, or factories were forced to provide products free of charge, and a large number of workers were stopped or underpaid, or were conscripted into the army, resulting in production stagnation, long-term arrears, and the inability to recruit workers and wages.

Thirdly, due to the destruction of the economy by the war, a large number of products have been backlogged and cannot be sold properly in the market.

Fourth, due to the devastation of the war, a large number of enterprises are unable to conduct scientific research, resulting in the stagnation or decline of productivity technology behind other countries.

Fifth, the enemy may carry out sabotage activities, resulting in the loss or destruction of many core technologies, so that the original technology cannot be restored, and the enemy may also use its military superiority to force its own country to accept the enemy's industrial products, or industrial facilities may be taken over by the enemy, resulting in a sluggish market and shrinking industry.