O 1454 What about Sigma 55 200?

If you want to capture distant objects such as stages and sports fields, of course, the Sigma 55200 is good, but the aperture at the telephoto end is a little smaller; The 40150 has a shorter focal length and better image sharpness than the Sigma 55200. It depends on what you're shooting. If the silver is sufficient, it is better to naturally choose the original 50200.

There is another option, wait a few days, Sigma will soon release 5 4 3 lenses, great news. If you're not in a hurry, you might as well wait a minute, it is estimated that there are one or two telefocal points in these 5, there should be better than 55-200, ** may be a little more expensive, but it should also be worth it, at least it will be more cost-effective than the original 40-150 and 50-200. View the original post

Mowgli has used 55-200 dead horses and then replaced with 40150, saying that 40150 is much better than dead horses! And the aperture of 55-200 is small, and the workmanship is poor, I have seen it, and I have no desire to buy it at all! The workmanship of the 40150 is better than that of a dead horse, the aperture is, most of the half gear, and the imaging is good.

I bought a new 2300, and there was a 1800 one out of town, and I had a first-hand plot. View the original post

It's also nothing if you're only 10% or even less with a 55-200 segment telephoto. Sigma's head is no exception. View the original post

Then buy a second-hand 40 150, which is about 1500, which is better value than 55-200. View the original post

Is it O-40150 or Sigma 55-200? In disappointment. View the original post

I have used the Sigma head, there is no sharpness to speak of, and the 40150 can still be used. View the original post

Sigma is about to make a new start, and I don't know if O'm going to make a move. It would be nice if I could get out of the way. I hope it's not too expensive. View the original post

Thanks a lot. What is the minimum amount of money you can get? What is the production process and feel?

I prefer things that are real and good value for money, so I got on E1-145440150 is probably not dust-proof and splash-proof. But if the workmanship is fine, it's okay.

View the original post

With a dead horse 55200 with 1454, that's called"Dog-tailed mink"!!!Laughing at me!! View the original post

There is a specialization in the lens industry, and the quality of the lens that goes all over the world is miserable. In fact, the two lenses you have are very good**,,Maybe you don't use it properly,,, it is recommended to buy a small tripod, the aperture is smaller, 8-10, shoot landscapes and macro with a small aperture, in addition, the 55 end of the 1855 lens is with a macro function,, you can try, the aperture is open to 8, put it on a tripod to shoot, there are often miracles.

As for birding, 600 is too long, and ** is expensive, you can replace 50-200 with the original 55-300, which is good.

If you really dislike 1855,,, it is recommended to buy a Sigma 17-70,,This head has a convenient focal length,With macro,Ultrasonic motor,17Large wide angle,And large aperture。。 Factotum..

ps: 1855+50-200 can be sold for 800 yuan.

Very telephoto? 18-600？Then why don't you have a very, very telephoto?,16-1200Isn't that better?,Hit the bird to see what kind of bird you want to hit., The owner's kind of bird speculates that it should be able to be photographed into a Tamron 90 micro.,If not, add a magnification lens.。

It's definitely 55250,Canon positioning is a portrait lens,I feel like it's okay.,But recently it's equipped with 28,50,85Three fixed focuses,Specialized in portraits。

All four shots are tourist shots, all of which are sailor-to-sailor situations.

If you have used 18-200, you won't want to use 18-135, and the workmanship of the lens is obviously stronger than that of 18-135 like plastic toys; In addition, you should never choose a combination of 18-55+55-200, the lens will definitely annoy you. Now the 18-200 dismantling head is about 2800 yuan.

In fact, 18-200 is better, and it is unthinkable to go all over the world in one shot. **It may be a little more expensive, but it will not cause dust or moisture to enter the fuselage. In terms of imaging results, 18-55 18-135 18-200 are all about the same.

In terms of ** and imaging effect, it is still 18-135 the most cost-effective, 1000 yuan cheaper than 18-200, and the image quality is slightly stronger, 18-55 and 55-250 It is very troublesome to change lenses back and forth, and hanging an 18-135 is enough for daily use. At present, it is 2,200 yuan a piece.

What about the brand of the lens? Nikkor, EF, Tamron, Tokina? What brand of camera is it? Didn't make it clear.

Isn't it okay to take the Tamron 18-270? That's suitable for walking the world in one shot. Good value for money, highly recommended. You just have to look at the average price on the Internet.

I don't recommend 55-200, it's still good to be 18, no vignetting. And now there are 70-300, 55-200 don't you feel a little embarrassed.

18-55 It's generally a pullover, if you're afraid of sinking, just this one, it's cheap, but I think it's short. Mine is a Nikkor 18-105, not expensive, less than 1000.

Fixed focus can also be considered, of course, expensive, such as Nikkor 35mm (documentary street sweeping), Sigma 85mm (portrait best) and so on.

This question has been struggling with since 10 years ago! Everyone's requirements are different, there are no rules, it depends on everyone's situation, 18-200 is really bad enough, it is recommended to play on a 1855 first, and then consider other lenses when you are familiar with the focal length, maybe play for a few days and have high requirements for the lens! 1855 All things considered, the losses were minimized.

If you like the original Nikkor 70-300VR, with image stabilization, ** not expensive, but not constant aperture.

Vice-factory lenses, most of the experts say that the Sigma lens is not suitable for Nikon machines, and the style of Tamron is very close to Nikon.

Therefore, it is recommended that you match the dragon cannon: Tamron 70-200 has a constant aperture, and it also has a full macro function, which I have used very well.; **More than 5000 points.

It's better to be the original head.

It's enough, but it's not the best. When starting, the camera must be well controlled, not a dog head on the left and a garbage head on the right. If you want to buy it, buy the best.

Like 50mm, buy it or don't buy it.

In addition, the virtual machine group is on the product**, which is super cheap.

I think so, everyone who plays SLR knows that Nikon's little bamboo cannon and Canon's little white rabbit are the ultimate dream of the majority of enthusiasts 200mm telephoto, and with XZP and XB2, they will not burn anymore

So my idea is to have a meter to go up to XZP (really not good, I think XGP is also great, uh), no rice first, if you want to feel the telephoto in advance, then come to 55-200VR to top (light, imaging OK, portable), and wait for the meter to be enough on XZP or XGP (I personally like XGP).

I don't know what LZ means, uh, honestly

Brother, if you have a tight hand, it's 70-300! I'm also poor, and the machine is also d90, two shots are enough to play, 24-85, 70-300 I feel more suitable for you.

Or Sigma Black, 70-200 classic focal length, more commonly used.

Personal sensory imaging quality 55-300 55-200 Sigma 18-200 but are worse than Nikon 18-200, if you want to image ***, it is recommended that the original 70-300VR or Tamron 70-300VC. In addition, the second-hand Nikon 18-200VR generation is about 2,000, which is also a good choice.

The image quality is definitely 55-300 good. But Sigma's 18-200 is convenient, and you can have a focal length of 18mm to 200mm without changing lenses.

The 18-200 is still better to start with the original manufacturer, and I personally recommend starting the Nikon 18-200VR

55 300 is undoubtedly more suitable for you than the other two. There is not much difference between Nikon's own imaging of these two heads, but the focal length of 300 is farther, and there are more subjects that can be photographed; Sigma is really not good, the color is much worse than the first two heads, in-focus, out-of-focus, similar, deformation control is very poor. So recommend 55 300

It is recommended that the 3000 budget can consider the Tamron A005.

It's all dog heads, there's no need to buy it, if you don't have a lot of telephoto silver, you have to buy 70-300VR, there's no need to get together the focal length, you have to see what subject and focal length you are suitable for, and the idea of matching the lens with a purpose and making up the focal length is not advisable.

It is recommended not to buy the 18-200, although it is full focal length coverage, but the quality is not to be seen - if these three are better than the Nikon 55-300, but the focal length is not very good, if it is not a full pair, it is recommended that 16-85 70-300 is enough.

The 70-300VR of the Hong Kong Bank is more than 2900, which is still good.

It's better to go directly to the 18-200 of the deputy factory as the hang-up head, and buy another 50 portraits.

18-55 50-200 two dog heads.

Buy D90 now? I suggest that the landlord should wait, due to the influence of Japan, D90 has risen by seven or eight hundred yuan, too high. Wait a few more months** and it will come down.

The head of 18-55 is too vegetable, it is better to buy a head of 18-200, the imaging is much better than that of 18-55, and it is not inferior to the Sigma 50-200

For the D90, these two heads are too low-end. The 18-55 image is good, but the plastic feeling is too heavy. Saying that 18-200 imaging is much better than it, I can't see it.

18-200 is just a chicken rib, not interesting. Nikon 18-70 or Tamron 17-50 are recommended. The telephoto is still Nikon 70-300VR, or buy a Nikon 80-200 and 80-200, you can only buy second-hand.

It would be better to consider the Nikon 55-300 in the early 2000s.

A good horse with a good saddle, D90 with this kind of lens, it's a waste!