-
The Canon Party for many years tells you about it
D3200 and 600D have a lot of parameters on the Internet, so I don't have to paste them complicated. Both SLRs are low-end machines, and from the perspective of fuselage performance, the biggest difference is that the D3200 fuselage does not have a motor, while the 600D fuselage has a motor.
Since the D3200 doesn't have a motor, you have to use Nikon's expensive Nikkor with a motor, or you have to adjust the focus manually. The 600D is compatible with Canon's full range of lenses without stress.
Choose this grade of body,The investment in the lens is generally not very large,You can only choose a low-end lens,According to the SLR I've played for so many years,Canon's low-end lenses are more cost-effective.。。 You can compare Nikon's 50mmf with Canon's small spittoon.
The performance of the fuselage is similar to that of both cameras, and since both of the photoreceptors are APS-C format, there is little difference in image quality, and the high-sensitivity performance is comparable. D3200 pixels are a little higher, 24 million pixels, 600D 18 million pixels, pixel size only determines the ** frame size, and the image quality has nothing to do with it.
Instead of tangling with the fuselage,It's better to be more entangled in how to match the lens.,Hehehe, if you have any questions about the lens, please feel free to ask additional questions.
Hand-coded words, thank you for it
-
These 2 are, of course, 3200, 24.16 million effective pixels and an expeed 3 image processing engine.
-
What head are you going to use for the Canon low-end body? If the same configuration of the pullover, then the Canon 18-end pullover has no choice, it is too rubbish.
But the D3200 is not suitable for purchase now, there is too much moisture, and it is just a new item on the market.
You can consider the combination of D3100+18-105VR, which is estimated to be more than 4000, which can meet your requirements.
Keep in mind that with an 18-end sleeve, only Nikon's looks like a DSLR lens.
-
The difference in the performance of SLRs at the same price point is almost negligible, and digital products are still worth what you pay for. The parameters of these two cameras are easy to find on the Internet, and the texture of the 600D is very bad, like a plastic toy, but it is also roughly in line with this price point. The D3200 has not been used, but the D5000 has been used, and it should feel similar.
Look at your statement, one of these two that attracts you is the red body, and the other is the flip screen. In fact, this is just a gimmick played by the brand, the red body pulls the wind, but it doesn't look so professional, and the flipping screen is actually not really used. I now use Pentax K5, all-metal body, three-proof, and 60D, D7000 at the same level, **lower.
I've used KX and KR before. I recommend you kr. There is also a red fuselage, a metal skeleton, and the texture is better than the entry machines of these two, and the price is lower, but it is relatively niche, and the after-sales service is relatively poor.
It is recommended that you go to the physical store to see the real thing and make a final decision. In a word, the performance of machines of the same level will not be very different, that's for sure, the difference is just personal hobbies.
-
The D3200 competitor is the 650D.
It is recommended that you choose the 650d. The size of the D3200 sensor remains the same, and a higher pixel size is not necessarily a good thing.
-
Which is better, Nikon D3200 or Canon 600D, use it yourself, thank you If you can explain it in detail, it will be even more. Low-end machines tend to attract people with parameters, and their performance is not comprehensive...It's pretty much the same, each with its own strengths. Nikon.
-
It's really pretty much the same, now it depends on whether you like Canon lenses or Nikon lenses, there's no need to think about it on the machine.
-
Nikon is recommended, but the D3200 is currently **inflated, so it's better to wait a while to start.
-
Personally, I think the Canon 600D is better.
-
I think the D3200 is better, my family bought it very easy to use, and ** not high.
D3200 is Nikon's entry-level SLR camera, which has now been discontinued, this machine is also the first DSLR machine after I changed the film machine, features: lightweight, enough pixels, good image quality, average control, as a machine for learning photography, I have to give 3200 to a friend's child, and I still use it, and I haven't had a failure in seven or eight years.
The first thing to remind you is that your 600d is a cross-frame body, and any lens has to be multiplied by the conversion coefficient after it is installed, so it is not as good as a full-frame camera in terms of wide angle, which is a natural disadvantage of the cut-off body, hehe. >>>More
If your boyfriend wants to use it in the future, 100D is too small, because 100D is a reduced volume version, the wiring from the sensor to the motherboard is too compact, heat dissipation (thermal noise affects high sensitivity) and failure have not been tested by time, if you only buy one lens, 18-135 is preferred, 18-55 telephoto is too short, if you want to add a lens in the future, you don't have to 18-135, too expensive.
Hello! Among DSLRs, the Nikon model has sharper images and is suitable for shooting landscapes; Canon models have more realistic color reproduction and softer images, making them ideal for portrait shooting. >>>More
Metering before releasing the shutter.