Who is stronger Curry or Paul? How does Curry s technique compare to Paul?

Curry has a brighter future, after all, young! For the time being, Paul is more powerful, Curry's vision still needs to be polished, and Curry's attack power is even stronger!

Of course Paul is strong, and from a personal point of view, I like Curry more than Paul! Although Paul peaked in 05 to 09! But I think that in the empty seat, Paul is a god-like being, although I am less powerful.

This depends on the three-point Curry is more accurate, and in terms of organizational ability, Paul is stronger.

I was very happy to stand on the podium, talking about ancient and modern Chinese and foreign chapters.

I was very happy to stand on the podium, talking about ancient and modern Chinese and foreign chapters.

I was very happy to stand on the podium, talking about ancient and modern Chinese and foreign chapters.

I was very happy to stand on the podium, talking about ancient and modern Chinese and foreign chapters.

I was very happy to stand on the podium, talking about ancient and modern Chinese and foreign chapters.

Curry worked hard to beat the Iron King with mistakes, after all, it was a cancer.

Paul is strong and Paul is the first vacant position, and the iron king can't compare to the mistakes.

Paul is strong at the moment, and the future is nesty.

Curry this season, a little bit last season.

Paul is stronger, but likes Curry.

Curry first, others at will.

This game has a result after the magic game.

The library is with you! If you don't accept it, get out! This is the essence of this bar!

Curry is a tumor, do you think the tumor can be compared to the first PG.

Paul is embarrassed to talk to me about Kubi this season?

The Paul family and the Curry family have a very good relationship privately.

Stephen Curry and Chris Paul, two epoch-making guards, are shaping their respective teams with their own infectious styles.

Paul is the perfect point guard, steady and aggressive, tough and brutal and cold-blooded. In his seventeen-year career, whether in the Hornets, Clippers, Rockets, or Thunder, there are a bit of good stories about turning stones into gold. Perfect amplification to help teammates, while also having a unique skill on the offensive end.

As a young man, he used to be a bouncing man with a propeller on his feet, but after a major injury, he became more and more sophisticated and composed, and his mid-range jumper was invisible, combined with the league's top passing skills, which made him extremely accurate and experienced on the offensive end.

He is like a mathematician, always using a witty brain and keen senses to analyze everything on the pitch and then make the choice that is most beneficial to the team.

And Stephen Curry, a not-so-traditional point guard, has solidly changed that position over the past decade.

Organizing guards, positions that have existed since the dawn of basketball, dribbling across the halfcourt, connecting the team's offense, and giving the ball to the right teammates at the right time are their vocation.

Curry is really strong.

Paul is a good player, but Curry has the top, his dominance, and he's really strong. Paul is a very traditional point guard, his main task is to attack, and he is indeed good in this regard, but this kind of player needs to be matched with a strong interior line, otherwise it will be difficult to exert his power, Paul's weakness is that his scoring ability is not strong enough, and it is difficult to get high scores just by relying on his height and technique. But Curry is different, as an outside lineman he has a lot of firepower, as long as he is full of scoring opportunities on the inside.

Curry's strongest skill is the three-point shooting, and the shooting percentage is very high. His finishing ability is also very strong, basically several times that of the inside, and his heads-up breakthrough is even better, although the league is not short of breakthrough experts, but Curry's borrowing and dismantling is a big skill. He's very fast when he shoots.

He has surpassed many people in the NBA, and his stunt is to change direction and dribble. The shooting speed is so fast that the average person can't learn it at all.

Secondly, his dribbling ability is not weak. Curry rarely uses his body to fight the enemy head-on, his style of play is more inclined to dodge the enemy, Curry's talent in shooting is unmatched, he has his own exclusive shooting bag, which also dismantles the limbs to make up for the lack of physical fitness, there are often two big men on the court to follow Curry, but they can't prevent it at all.

Curry has never done anything before in the dribbling and three-point shooting, but even the best skills depend on his teammates. Relying too much on the three-point shot can only passively in the old system of the brigade, purely relying on the team to pass and run opportunities, and the opportunities created by tactics are also easy to be interfered with by tactics, Curry's three-point shooting method is much stronger, and he will take the initiative to create a combination of team passing and running to make the three-point shot more optimized. Curry also has shortcomings, and his breakthrough ability is not strong.

Given the three-point shooting ability, Curry's breakthrough ability is an additional skill, and everyone has to wrap him up, and without O'Neal's size, it is basically difficult to break through.

Curry's skill set is very strong, and because Curry is a very good basketball player, and he's very good at basketball, and he's very accurate when he dribbles and shoots three-pointers, so I think compared to Paul, Curry's skill is very strong.

Curry's control skills and organizational skills are not as skilled as Paul's, but his projection ability and lethal ability, and ability to create space for teammates to shoot easily are better than Paul's. The offensive technique is more delicate.

Curry isn't as good as Paul in terms of tandem offense, and Paul is better if he averages more assists per game than his career.

Curry's skills are even better, because his shooting percentage is particularly high, and his overall strength is also particularly strong.

No, because the two of them have their own strengths and weaknesses, Paul is particularly strong in the process of playing the ball, and can dribble in an orderly manner, and then the two of them have been together a total of 39 times, Paul's average points per game reached points, and then the rebounds he obtained, the assists he completed, Curry's points per game averaged yes, and then the rebounding score was.

Yes, because Curry has strong individual ability, he touched his ceiling after leading the team for the first time, and his shooting speed is not usually fast, he is the point guard on the team, has won a total of three NBA championships, and then also won the MVP of the regular season, won the scoring title twice, and won the Basketball World Cup in 2014.

is not stronger than Paul, because the main direction and attack of the two of them are completely different, and the two of them are also comparable in terms of physical fitness, if they really fight, they may only play Chang Zhao to a draw. Negotiable rent.

I think Curry is stronger. Both are NBA superstars and team leaders, both of whom belong to the point guard position on the team, and their strength also represents the strength of the team. No matter how the league landscape changes, the point guard has always been an important candidate in every era, whether it's the center era or the small-ball era.

The point guard plays a very important role in the team, connecting the team and helping the team complete various tasks. However, there are many excellent point guards in history, such as Chris Paul of the Phoenix Suns and Stephen Curry of the Golden State Warriors.

In fact, many fans come to evaluate whether a vacant seat is qualified, and they choose to see if he has the ability to lead the team. However, Chris Paul and Stephen Curry are often compared to fans to see who is the better leader? Personally, I think the Golden State Warriors' Stephen Curry is more capable of leading the team.

Although Chris Paul is a good player, he has also played for many good teams. Just like Paul is a pure point guard, he does a good job, but Curry is a more dangerous offensive player.

Although it seems that Chris Paul is more capable, he actually has a very good helper by his side, and if Chris Paul leads the team alone, the team's performance will be miserable. But Stephen Curry is different. Stephen Curry is a very good all-time superstar.

He's got super three-point ability and can change the game and as long as he's feeling good, it's almost unstoppable.

I think Curry's Warriors team can create brilliance and still go down in NBA history, but the Suns are different, and if Booker is not in good shape and can't play well, it will be difficult for Paul to lead the Suns to victory. Of course, 100 people have 100 different opinions in their heads. Some people may think that Paul is more capable, and some people think Curry is more capable.

But there's no denying that both are good point guards in the league and will undoubtedly be in the NBA Hall of Fame when they retire.

I think Curry's ability is stronger, because Curry's season score has reached more than 19,000 points, which is four or five thousand points more than Paul.

Curry's personal strength is stronger, Curry's performance on the court is very good, whether it is shooting or dribbling, he has achieved good results and stable performance.

Curry's strength is stronger, Curry has more potential to improve both physically and technically, and he will surpass others by a lot in the future.

I admit Paul is a very good player. But Curry will be better!

Although he missed out on the MVP in 2008, the results of 4 first-team teams and 7 first-team defensive teams are enough to prove that he is definitely a first-class star of this era. But it wasn't until this year, Paul's 16th season, that he made it to the finals. It has to be said that he also has his limitations.

In the sixth year of his career, Curry won the championship as the No. 1 core. In the years that followed, his performances on the Circle were evident for all to see. Ten years later, he took the all-time point guard position.

This level of dominance was clearly beyond Paul's reach. I don't like to hold them one by one. I have all the respect for Paul's career.

However, after the 2014 playoffs, neither in the regular season nor in the playoffs, Paul did not take advantage of Curry. In the 14-15 season, the Warriors won 3-1 against the Clippers, and Curry swept Paul in the 15-16 season. In the 16-17 season, Paul only played once in Curry due to injury, but he still couldn't make it.

We can see that in Curry's prime, he averaged 30 points per game against Paul, and basketball is still a sport that needs to compete and score. It's no secret that Curry has played the highest value in Kerr's system. While many Warriors fans are unhappy with Curry because of Kerr's insistence on using the pass-and-cut system, what really shows up in the MVP discussion is that Kerr implants this system into the team.

Of course, this system would have allowed Curry to have fewer assists than Paul's traditional point guards, but it was this system that allowed Curry to dominate the NBA for almost four years. Curry's dominance in the playoffs at this level is unmatched, and it's great enough. He has shown what kind of accolades a player can achieve in his physical condition.

But if you want to chase Curry, this task is left to his old teammate Harden.

Come on! Curry and Paul laughed together!

If you make an objective evaluation, Curry's versatility is indeed stronger than Paul, Paul, as a talented player among small men, is also very good, but Curry is a mess except for dunking, almost three points are incredibly accurate, and has turned the tide in the game many times, while Paul seems a little insufficient, of course, they are each good in their own way, and in general, Curry is more powerful.

Curry's strength is very strong, he is very aggressive when he plays, his leadership skills on the court are very good, and he can do a good ball control role, while Paul's status in the team is not particularly high, equivalent to a dispensable role, so Curry is stronger than Paul.

Yes, Curry is stronger than Paul, because Curry has an important role to play on the whole team, and Curry has already won three championship trophies.

Curry is a well-known player in the NBA. Curry got the MVP of the season, and he's perfect for three-point shooting. The overall strength is a little stronger than Paul.

Point Point: Paul is the number one defender in the league.

Curry is one of the best players in the league today and a leading figure for the Warriors. Before Curry entered the NBA, the Warriors were a full-fledged team, but after his rise, the Warriors fought back and became a dynasty team. Thompson and Green are important, but the soul of the team has always been Curry.

As the leader of the team, Curry's best record is 73 wins. What is the best record of legendary point guards like Kidd, Paul, Nash, etc.?

Curry's best year was the 15-16 season. He was the MVP of the league at the time, not only at his peak, but also in good health. He played 79 games that season.

As the defending champions, players such as Thompson, Green, Azeli, and Barnes are all on a hot streak. Curry held the gorgeous data of 30+5+7 per game, and finally led the Warriors to the first 73-9 record in history, and performed perfectly.

Kidd played in the league for 19 years, playing for the Mavericks, Suns, Nets, Knicks, and other teams. Although the Mavericks have a good record, Nowitzki is the boss of the team. Kidd's peak time as boss was the Nets era.

He led the Nets to the Finals for the second year in a row that year, leading the team to 52 wins in 2001-02, the best record Kidd had as his boss. That year, the Nets always lost to the Lakers.

Nash is also the legendary point guard. His career started at a low point. He played as a substitute for many years and switched to a lot of teams.

Even at the age of 30, he was abandoned by the Kuban. After all, Nash has mediocre talent, and it is normal to be looked down upon at the age of 30. However, after that, Nash hit back and he became an MVP superstar.

In 2005, he led Sun to a 62-20 record that topped the league, and his strength is evident.

At his peak, Paul was also the league's No. 1 point guard for many years. In his third year of junior high school, he was able to compete with Kobe Bryant for MVP, and his strength was very strong. Paul has a strong ability to lead a team.

Whether it's the Hornets, Clippers, Rockets or Thunder, Paul is a playoff regular. However, after joining the Rockets, Paul is no longer at his peak. His heyday was the Clippers and Hornets era, and he led the team to 56 wins, which was a hot spot at the time.

Let's take a look at Lillard. He's also an underrated point guard. Since entering the league, Lillard has never missed the playoffs.

He has been outstanding individually, leading the team to the Western Conference Finals. Lillard has a high ceiling for leading the team, and no matter how his teammates change, he can at least make the playoffs. Among them, last year was his best year as the boss, leading the Trail Blazers to a 53-29 record, third in the West, and a strong playoff finish.