Friend: I want the truest statement, not the idealized one

LZ said: How many friendships can't withstand the ravages of time, misunderstandings, money, interests? Indeed, these problems are serious.

As a friend, you should try to avoid such a thing, but at the same time, you must be sincere, I am also willing to give sincere relative and understanding to my friends, if your friends cherish this feeling as much as you think, then I think eternity exists. True eternity is cherished, true friends will be willing to solve misunderstandings with you, money is now relying on cooperation, so that mutual benefit and symbiosis are good!

The kind that can talk to you when you're sad.

Friends, only those who grew up together know the roots, understand their thoughts, and can be regarded as friends.

If you want to keep your friendship, you can't have an intersection of interests with your friends.

Why is it said that distant relatives are not as good as close neighbors, relatives are often close to each other, and friends are nothing more than that.

Truth be told, friends are not a necessity, just a spice for everyday life.

It is recommended that you look at the tips for making friends.

If you are a friend, you don't need to talk much, love is stronger than Jin, and it changes because of external objects, which can only show that the friend is not worthy, or it is a hidden feeling, or the relationship is not iron enough. My two friends are very righteous and usually chat, but no matter who has a problem or asks for help, the other two will always do their best to help. By friendship, by trust, by a sense of responsibility.

Distrusting each other is an insult to a friend, whether that person is distrusted by his friend, what will he think, and what will you think? Trust without the need for another word.

In fact, when you are unhappy or happy, a friend can listen to you quietly next to you and share your happiness and sorrow.

To say that you live for ideals, not for reality, is too idealistic, that is, what you are pursuing is too perfect, of course people should live in real life, it is okay to pursue ideals, but it must be suitable for the pursuit of real life.

I think the meaning of this sentence is too idealistic, because we don't live for ideals, we live for real life, because we always have to face reality, although our ideals have not been realized, but we should still face real life.

Hello, to say that you live for ideals, not for reality, this sentence means that your life may have been living in your own imagination, and has not returned to real life. This is not practical.

If he says that he lives for his ideals, then it actually shows that she is for her own ideals, so that she will have a goal to strive for.

It means that the other party thinks that this person is too idealistic and unrealistic, and lives in his own fantasy every day.

I think well, what I mean by saying this is that this person is too unrealistic, unconnected, not grounded, well, always living in fantasy.

That is to say, your ideals are divorced from reality, so ambitious, and difficult to realize.

Some people can say that the purpose of his life is to fight for his own struggle, for his own ideals and goals, but some people say that the ideal may be skinny, and the reality is more real, so it is said that he lives unrealistically.

Maybe it's because your ideas are sometimes too empty and too general, so they will let him have such thoughts.

The meaning of this sentence is that you don't have too many impressions in this life, and you spend everything fighting for your ideals, saying that you don't know that we still have to succumb to life.

Because people are realistic, let's face real life

Hello, the person who said this to you must be older than you, right? In fact, what he means is nothing more than that you are not pragmatic and unrealistic, your eyes are low, and your current grades and income are not good; He is a kind reminder or advice, I hope you can be down-to-earth, do the current things well, make more money, live your own life, have a certain material foundation and knowledge reserves, and then work hard to realize your ideals. But I don't completely agree with his statement, I don't completely deny you, young people should have dreams and minds, although they may not be able to achieve it, but give yourself a good pursuit and goal, is your driving force; People with ideals may not succeed, but successful people must have ideals, not people who are satisfied with the present.

As for how you understand what he said and what I think later, it depends on your personal ability to understand, and I can only say that he is right, but don't destroy your own ideals.

It's that you're too impetuous, and it's not practical at all.

Although it is very idealistic, we should all have ideals, because if you have ideals, you will have the goal to strive for, which is normal.

The realization of ideals is based on reality, and if it is not realistic, it is just called a dream.

Living for the ideal is very empty in itself, and if the ideal cannot be grasped, it is still more reliable in reality. The idea of either living for the sake of reality, or living in an ideal world, is of course too idealistic.

In fact, it is right for people to live for ideals and live for ideals, but it is also right to live for ideals in real life, as long as you work hard for your ideals, you will definitely achieve them.

Then what he means may be to live realistically, maybe some of your ideas are more ethereal and unrealistic, don't take the machine, and live a down-to-earth life.

Hello, the meaning of this sentence is that sometimes the ideal is too big. Aim too high and you'll be disappointed. The reality gap is too great.

It means that your ideas are not realistic, a little naïve, ungrounded, and a bit otherworldly.

I think the phrase "friends are not in many, but in confidants" is very right, why do you want friends? The meaning of a friend is that you can come to see you when you have something, can come to comfort you, or can contribute to it, to put it bluntly, it is to be useful. Conversely, he or she can think of you when something happens, whether it's good or bad.

I don't think you can get such a friend without a heart-to-heart exchange. So in my opinion, friends should be confidant and heart-to-heart. So, some people want to say that it is wealth to have more such friends, but people's time and energy are limited, and there are people who divide them into groups.

So it's actually impossible to have more friends. Of course, I'm talking about true friends, and I don't know what the guy who asked the question defines as a friend.

\"Friends are not in many, but in confidants"It can't be said that this is one-sided, it makes sense Why don't you have more friends, because if you have more friends, you will have more entertainment, so that more time is not your own! And "in the heart" can be said to be so, if you have two very intimate friends around you, very iron, on the surface you only have these two iron buddies, but these two iron buddies, in addition to you also have their own iron buddies, in this way, for you, there are a lot of friends hidden around you, but at this time your entertainment is relatively small! Of course, everyone has their own ambitions, and some people like to socialize, so it doesn't hurt to make more friends!

There are two sides to everything.

Having more friends can help you a lot. But if you have a lot of friends and few friends, you are often likely to poke you in turn.

If you are capable, you should know"The human heart is separated from the belly"bar. Here it is"It's in the heart"The importance of the place.

There is still some truth to this sentence.

"It is enough to have a confidant in life", and it is impossible to have many intimate friends; Friends in general, the more the merrier. "The fewer enemies the better, and the more friends the better". "The friendship of gentlemen is as light as water", and ordinary friends can only be average.

I also think that this kind of thinking is one-sided, of course, the more friends, the better, so to speak, the first half of the sentence is wrong, but it is true to know which friend is really honest, and the second half of the sentence is right. We should learn how to behave in the world, and as for whether we know our friends, we can just think about it in our hearts.

Friends are not in many, but in confidantsThis is probably an ancient saying! At that time, it was impossible for people to recognize each other so widely, but now, people from the east, south, and northwest are all together.

So, yes, that's right! Now, it's not so absolute!

In fact, this is nonsense, no matter who knows the most friends, there are a few, it can't be dozens, because people just have so much time.

"Friends are not in the many, in the heart" This statement is one-sided, agree with the landlord on this point.

The love of friends, the sharing of honor and disgrace;

The love of husband and wife is in the same boat through thick and thin;

The love of wealth, if it survives, it dies;

The love of the wise, what to worry about!

Actually, I don't feel like it needs to be so poetic!

If it is a one-sided love for another person, it is: you are blessed to enjoy, and I am responsible for difficulties! I hope so! Regrets!

If it is the love of two people, let's use an analogy: you and he or she see an apple at the same time, and at the same time, you hold out your left hand and he or she stretches out your right hand. Pick up the apples together, break them in half, and feed each other to eat.

In short, it's tacit understanding!

I heard that the highest level of love is habit. Get used to everything. Get used to everyone around you.

Emotion. Goods. Even the mood.

There is another saying (my opinion) that the highest level of love is to be able to confide everything to the other person, without any secrets, without any deception, and to trust the other person. It's a very sweet love life. This may just be the love I yearn for in my heart, what do you say?

See which one you agree with

Love what you love, love what you hate;

Pray for the blessing of your love, for yourself.

Give yourself a smile when your love hurts you and your heart hurts, because I love myself and don't want to make myself sad, and I wish him not to be hurt by others;

Give yourself a smile when you hate you and give yourself a smile when you are angry, because I love myself and don't want to be sad, and pray that he will not be hurt by others.

Build your own happiness on the happiness of others and keep your sorrows to yourself, because I love everyone.

When the one I love is about to be hurt, I will protect him with my life, because I love him;

When the one I hate is about to be hurt, I will protect him with my life, because I used to hate him.

Tell happy things to others, let others be happy with yourself;

Keep the sadness to yourself, let yourself cry, and then smile slightly, and nothing happened.

I love all of them because they are my brothers and sisters, but you know what?

I'm tired ...... doing this

To put it simply, the highest level of love is nothing more than the creation of the next generation.

It's just that your physiological needs are satisfied

The highest level of love is not to love, not to love, that is the highest level of love, haha.

Love everyone around you, accept some injustices around you, I think, the greatest love is: tolerance.

The highest state of love: love when you die.

Fraternity, the highest state of love, love him (her), whether you can be with him or not, silently bless him, continue to love him, love everyone.

The highest state of love is to give up, and when you give up your most important thing for love, you should reach the highest level of love.

My understanding of love is that if you often think that she (he) wants him (her) to understand that you care about you, I think this is the initial love.

I think the highest level of love is broad love, which is not only love but also friendship and family, as well as love for everyone around you.

Ha: The highest level of love is to give your life for this

Almost, yes, my boyfriend and I secretly made this plan in our minds: if I didn't want him, he would kill me. I also told the dorm man that if he didn't want me, I would try to make as much money as I could give to my parents, and then kill him and kill myself again, hehe, and one day I asked him, what would you do if I didn't want you? And he said like I said, "I said, how do you think the same way I do?"

If you can't be together, it's no fun to live hehe, it may be two psychopaths, maybe it's just a comfort to yourself

The highest level of love is not to love, because you love too much, let your love go to the other person, and in the end, you don't have love, it should be right

A sincere heart, not pretending to be superficial.

The above are all idealistic statements on paper.

I have been a human being for more than 30 years, and I have never encountered the so-called sincerity, trust, communication, care, understanding, and tolerance, which are all disguised by people, human beings are the most self-comforting and self-deceiving animals, in fact, the most real, the most practical, and the most accurate between friends is the two words ---

Benefit! ))

Brotherhood is the most important thing.

There must be mutual trust and sincerity.

What is a friend? It is the person who stands up for you when you need it most, the person who cares about you and loves you. It's all in plain sight.

Friends treat each other with a sincere heart.

Sincerity, trust, communication, care, understanding, tolerance.