Today we have once again proved that world peace depends on the United States!

The Norwegian Nobel Prize Committee announced that the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize would be awarded to Barack Obama of the United States. The Nobel Committee said that Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen world diplomacy and cooperation among the peoples of the world." The following is the full text of the award speech.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee decided to award the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama** for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen world diplomacy and cooperation among the world's peoples. The Nobel Committee placed particular emphasis on his vision of a nuclear-free world and his work to that end. ”

As a leader, Obama has created a new atmosphere in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained its centrality, emphasizing the role of the United Nations and other international organizations. Dialogue and negotiation have become the preferred means of resolving even the most complex international conflicts.

The notion of a nuclear-free world has given a powerful impetus to disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama's initiative, the United States is now playing a constructive role in addressing the enormous challenge of climate change facing the world. Democracy and human rights have been strengthened.

Few have captured the world's attention and made people look forward to a better future as Obama did. His philosophy of diplomacy is rooted in the notion that world leaders must conduct their diplomacy in accordance with the values and perceptions of the majority of the world's population. ”

For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has been working to advance such an international and international political idea, and now Obama is the chief spokesman. The Nobel Committee applauded Obama's call that 'each of us now has our part in tackling global challenges.''。”

The Peace Prize was awarded by a horse.

Some hooligans and scoundrels were already jealous of the rich man's wealth, but now when they see that the rich man has won another honor, they can't bear it, and jump up and down.

Nobel is also funny by the United States.

You can bring him a high hat, and it won't be good to use force in the future.

Indeed, it can be seen in Obama.

One is a bald eagle and the other is a braised pigeon.

Chicago is a musical film adapted from the Broadway play of the same name, directed by Rob Marshall and starring Renee Zellweger, Richard Gere, John C. Reilly, etc. The film tells the story of two cases that happened in Chicago, and the story of the lawyer Billy's hype and became famous, vividly interpreting the world of Chicago in the twenties of the twentieth century in which he sought to be famous by any means. The film uses a seemingly praising tone to thoroughly ridicule the impetuous mentality represented by Chicago in the 20s of the last century.

The fun of the film can be summed up as ".

(1) Viewpoint: This war has changed from a European war to a global war. (2 points) basis: Accession of the United States; The outcome of the war was no longer entirely decided by the countries of Europe. (2 points).

2) Impact: On the one hand, the productive forces are destroyed, the population is sharply reduced, and the overall historical development of the world is hindered. (2 points) On the other hand, after successive large-scale wars, international organizations or international rules are used to regulate the behavior of states; The rational concept of peace is conducive to restraining war and promoting the overall development of world history.

Stalin believed that the treaty was signed correctly. (1 point) Putin believes that the signing of the treaty is immoral and should be condemned But the main reason for World War II was that the Munich Agreement between Britain and France and Germany dashed hopes for a collective security in Europe. (2 points).

4) The United States launched a war of aggression against Korea (war of aggression against Vietnam). (2 points).

Analysis of the test questions: 1) According to material 1, "From the initial war over the European question, which was essentially a war in Europe, to a war on a global scale. Now, the entry of the United States means the involvement of a non-European power that quickly determines the outcome of the war. It is possible to summarize the views put forward by Stavrianos about this war and its basis.

2) According to the material "On the one hand, the war leads the world community to a state of disorder. On the other hand, the destruction of civilization by war has prompted peoples to work towards peace, and the international community has moved towards a state of order. World wars have caused huge losses to human society," and combined with relevant historical facts, we can explain the impact of wars on the overall development of world history.

3) According to the material "Stalin. We have guaranteed our country a year and a half of peace and the possibility of preparing our forces to fight back against the enemy, and if fascist Germany dares to invade our country in violation of the treaty, it is not to mention that we are the end, and fascist Germany loses. In this regard, it is not accurate to think that the Soviet-German Non-Aggression Pact was the 'only trigger' for World War II.

It would be irrational to reject Germany's proposal to sign a treaty of mutual aggression at the very least. The similarities and differences in the evaluations of Stalin and Putin on the Soviet-German Non-Aggression Pact can be summarized separately. (4) According to the material five, "a great victory was won."

We have experienced the suffering of loss and the joy of victory, and we have learned that there can be no turning back. We must move forward and preserve in peace what we have gained in war......MacArthur's reflections and understanding of World War II can be summarized. The fact that the United States launched local wars such as the War of Aggression against Korea and the Vietnam War shows that the United States has not really achieved "no turning back" after World War II.

The Chinese people love peace, but in order to defend peace, they have never and will never be afraid to resist wars of aggression. The Chinese people will never tolerate foreign aggression, nor can they allow the imperialists to wantonly invade their neighbors and turn a blind eye. It cannot be ignored. Because:

1) China will not take the initiative to provoke a war against the United States. China did not send troops to Hawaii, it was the United States that invaded and occupied the Chinese territory of Taiwan Province. Despite this, China has made efforts to negotiate the withdrawal of all its armed forces from Taiwan Province and the Taiwan Strait region, and has been holding talks with the United States in Geneva and then in Warsaw on this issue of principle that must not be compromised for more than 10 years.

That's a good proof of that.

2) Chinese speak counting. That is, if Asia, Africa, or any country in the world is invaded by imperialism led by the United States, China and the Chinese people must provide support and assistance. If such a righteous action causes the United States to invade China, we will not hesitate to resist and fight to the end.

3) China is prepared. If the United States imposes a war on China, no matter how many people it comes in and what it uses, including nuclear weapons, it is safe to say that it will be able to get in and not get out. Since the 14 million people of South Vietnam can deal with more than 200,000 US troops, the 650 million Chinese people will certainly be able to deal with 10 million US troops.

No matter how many American aggressors come, they will be wiped out in China.

4) When a war is fought, there are no boundaries. Some US military strategists want to rely on sea and air superiority to bomb China instead of fighting a ground war. This is wishful thinking.

Since the war began with an air or naval battle, it is not up to the United States to decide how the war will continue. You can come from the air, can't we go by land? Therefore, we say that once a war is fought, there are no more boundaries.

Positive: In today's ever-changing world, peace and development have become the main themes of the world. After World War II, the world economy grew rapidly, and many countries made brilliant achievements in economic development. But while developing, do countries really realize the importance of peace? =

Since the end of the Cold War, although most countries have given priority to economic development, military conflicts continue to occur in some regions. With the Middle East facing each other today and the nuclear race in South Asia starting again tomorrow, how many days will the international community be calm? Don't mention it from afar, let's just talk about how many wars have broken out in the past ten years:

The Iran-Iraq War, the Gulf War, and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict ......Didn't the US-led NATO use force against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia not long ago? It can be seen that peace has not been completely achieved in today's world.

We wonder why these countries are always at war? Don't they want peace? Of course not. So why are they still fighting? I think this is mainly due to the fact that one of the belligerents perceives certain practices of the other side as affecting their own interests.

Take, for example, the Iraqi verification crisis. The United States always accuses Iraq of possessing nuclear **, and as a result, the inspection team has checked again and again, but who has really discovered the nuclear **? Iraq only cried out for grievances, and the United States threatened with force.

As a result, Iraq could not bear it anymore and rejected the unreasonable demands of Britain and the United States, and war broke out. On the surface, the United States is also here to maintain world peace. However, analysts have long pointed out that the root cause of this crisis is oil.

Because the Gulf is rich in oil, and Iraq is one of the major oil exporters in the Gulf region, it can even control the world's oil industry. As a result, the United States believes that Iraq's presence has affected its interests in the Gulf, so it has come up with many excuses and is determined to eradicate this hard-line "Saddam regime" in order to control oil production in the Gulf.

Let's talk about the war in which NATO launched an air raid on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in late March last year. NATO claims that it carried out air strikes against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia when all the international community's efforts to politically resolve the Kosovo issue had failed. And isn't the root cause so?

Political analysts have pointed out that the war was the work of US "hegemonism."

The 20th century is the American century, and the United States wants to make the 21st century still the American century, and moreover, it wants to continue to control NATO as a tool for the realization of its hegemony. Therefore, under the pretext that political efforts cannot resolve the Kosovo issue, NATO has brazenly dispatched troops to attack the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in order to pull out this thorn in its side in the Balkans.

It can be seen that not all warring countries do not want peace, but a few countries want to control other countries and practice solipsistic power. However, they will eventually fail. The world needs peace, and humanity needs peace.

I believe that under the influence of China, Russia, and other countries that uphold justice, more and more countries will oppose this kind of cat rights, and the international community will definitely achieve permanent peace.