-
Anonymous users2024-02-09Friend: The so-called "end of the world", we don't have to take it seriously or criticize. The apocalypse of the world, from a purely scientific standpoint, is always a possibility.
Because an unknowable catastrophe can happen at any time - maybe the next hour will be the end of the world, this possibility also exists, but it is very unlikely. Moreover, according to our materialist theory, this world has a beginning and an end, and the earth itself, the solar system itself, also has a life cycle, and there are days of aging and death, and then of course it will be the end of the world. In this sense, the end of the world certainly exists.
But the problem is that when we talk about "disbelief" about the end of the world, we have another implicit problem. When we talk about "believing or not believing", we are implying another question – that is: if you believe, how are you going to live?
If you don't believe it, how are you going to live? For example, if you are convinced that the world will be the end of the world in two years, and if you are sure that the world will be normal in two years, your attitude towards life will be different at the moment. In the former case, you may think that the world will be finished in two years anyway, and from now on you will not be willing to accept many constraints, you want to eat, drink and have fun, you want to get drunk and dream of death, you want to go against the .......
If you believe that the world is still normal, then of course you will not be nonsense. In other words, are you planning to structure your current life according to the destruction of the world in two years? Reason tells us that the vast majority of people cannot arrange their lives in this way, and it is impossible for them to accept this assumption to arrange their lives.
The vast majority of people, as long as they are rational, will definitely arrange their lives according to the assumption that the world will be normal in two years. So why do most people believe that the world will be normal in this situation? Because according to the existing scientific theories, we can know that the world will be normal in two years, and even if anything does change in the solar system, it will be a long-term change, and of course it will not be felt in a few years of timescale.
So why do we believe in science and not in mystic prophecy? That's because the achievements of science over the past few hundred years have led us to believe that this theory works, and that it is correct in explaining most natural phenomena. For example, if its understanding of gravity is correct, so much so that we can launch a spacecraft to Mars and actually land on Mars, it means that our orbit is correct, and the whole theory on which we calculate this orbit is correct, and if it is not correct in the slightest, the spacecraft will not fly there.
In this sense, the authority of science is, of course, the greatest. When faced with this choice, most people are still willing to choose science. Choosing science, of course, we assume that the world will be normal in two years, and of course we will not believe in doomsday prophecies.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-08The future is just a legend, and in this hopeless era, nothing is necessarily a bad thing.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-07No, but we also need to pay attention to the environment.
I'll give you advice, can you see it? 1.Look at the world with another eye, not everyone in this world is very smooth, just look at how you solve it, for example, you were hit by someone when you were walking, others apologized to you, sometimes you still feel very angry, but you didn't expect that the person who hit you was actually more uncomfortable than you, or think about the sentence "Happy is also a day, unhappy is also a day, why not be happy every day". >>>More
Fifty percent is genetic, and fifty percent is nurture. Wish.
Conclusion: Not necessarily.
Truth analysis: Although cola is a high-sugar drink, drinking cola does not necessarily make you fat. We often say that matter is conserved, energy is not extinguished, and excessive energy intake will cause obesity. Although the sugar in cola is indeed absorbed and metabolized quickly, which is more likely to cause fat accumulation, if you drink cola only once a day, the intake of other foods is more strictly controlled, and it will not increase the risk of obesity. >>>More
If love can go through the tempering of distance, then there will be no problem, but the most needed is mutual trust, a long-term love will sometimes have a distance, the distance in the heart, even if you are close to each other, but your heart is far away from each other, that long-term love, you should "say goodbye". Although the saying is very good, "distance produces beauty", how much love can withstand the test of distance? Many loves, which are considered perfect, will disappear right in front of their eyes, let alone separate. >>>More
There is no dragon that represents the royal family and the nation in the traditional sense. The dragon is not something imaginary, according to legend, in ancient times, the various tribes in the land of China were constantly at war, and the alliance of the two tribes was the most powerful, that is, the Yanhuang Alliance tribe that was considered the ancestor of China by modern people, the Yan Emperor and the Yellow Emperor were actually not high or low, but the traditional understanding always believed that the Yellow Emperor was respected. Every time the Yellow Emperor unifies a tribe, in order to win people's hearts, he always adds a part of the totem of the conquered tribe to his banner, and the temperament of each tribe at that time does not have much artistic processing, often some uncarved fierce birds and beasts, and finally, the Yanhuang tribe unifies China, and their own totem has become a little strange, recorded in ancient books as "from the head to the arm, the arm to the waist, the waist to the tail, all stop each other." >>>More