Who is stronger among the current digital camera manufacturers?

The stronger ones generally include Canon, Nikon, Sony, Fujifilm, Ricoh and so on.

The manual function is that you can set the shutter value, aperture value, and ISO by yourself. Of course, this sometimes includes mechanical zoom and manual focusing.

Manual function, exercise technique is useful, night view is useful.

For the specific model, you can see here.

Canon Ixus 80, Fujifilm Z100FD, Sony W series, Nikon P60, P50 are all good.

In the case of a DSLR, it is Nikon.

Ordinary Canon, Olympus, Panasonic, etc. are good (don't buy Nikon, they only have high-end machines that do well).

If you know how to take pictures a little, if you want to shoot better, you have to buy a manual one, you can adjust the focus and aperture by yourself, and you have more autonomy in shooting. (Manual ones are generally more expensive, and there are also those in the early 2000s).

I prefer Canon's Ixus series, mainly depending on personal preference, to buy the best one for you.

As far as cameras go, Canon's is the best, and Canon lenses are the best among camera lenses! As for Zeiss and Leica lenses, they are more suitable for cameras.

If you have a price at this point, everyone is about the same, and it is recommended to buy Panasonic FX30

Personal advice Canon My dad is a photographer I've always used Canon It's pretty good and it's very good.

Let me explain it from the user's point of view:

Cameras are divided into digital and film.

DSLR cameras also have digital SLRs and film SLRs.

Film cameras use film to sensitize light, and digital cameras use digital chips to sensitize light.

The image we see passes through the lens and reaches the film or digital chip, and the chemical reaction of the film records the impact and the digital chip senses and records the impact, which is the process of light sensitivity.

Ordinary digital cameras are commonly known as DC, and they are very different from SLR cameras in terms of optical structure.

From the user's point of view, there are several main differences:

1.Sensor size differences. The difference in the area of the sensor between ordinary DC and DSLR is about ten to twenty times. The photosensitive area directly determines the image quality, so the imaging difference between ordinary digital cameras and digital SLRs is huge.

2.Lens differences. Ordinary DC generally can't change the lens, digital SLR can change the lens, not only telephoto wide angle, but also macro, etc., the quality level of the SLR lens is much higher than DC, the lens is the first pass for light to enter the camera, which directly affects imaging, so this difference is also very big.

3.Due to the different optical structure, the SLR has a physical shutter, and the shutter quality and level of the SLR are much higher than that of ordinary DC, but due to the physical shutter, the SLR will have a "click" shutter sound when taking pictures, and ordinary DC does not have it (you can set the sound, but this is a recording, not the actual sound), for serious occasions such as **, the shutter of the SLR is a fatal shortcoming.

Other differences aren't particularly important to users, and the boundaries are blurring with the development of technology.

1 The sensor area is much, much larger. The general digital camera is only 2 3 inches large, very small, about half the size of your small fingernail, the smaller the thin and light machine photosensitive parts, and the common APS-C format of the digital SLR is more than ten times the general camera picture, and the professional full-frame is larger, and the fundamental factor affecting the image quality is the size of the photosensitive part, so the general camera image quality is far lower than the reason for the digital SLR.

2 lenses. SLR lenses are all independently designed, can be replaced, can be used for different purposes of shooting, moreover, the high-end lenses have strict optical indicators, the imaging quality is very good, and the general camera lens can not be replaced, and the design is to facilitate the use of the goal, so the lens quality is far lower than the SLR lens.

3 Focusing and metering system. The metering system used by the SLR is an independent module, and the focus adopts phase focusing, which has high focusing accuracy, fast speed and accuracy, while the general camera only has contrast focusing, slow focusing, and low accuracy.

These three points are where DSLRs are far superior to ordinary digital cameras.

The sensor area is large and cannot be compared.

Personally, I think the most cost-effective SLR camera is Canon 60D, which is currently priced at around 6000. The imaging is very good. Ideal for amateur photographers who are just learning to use a DSLR camera.

It is also suitable for beginner photographers who have a certain foundation in photography, and the camera is simple and easy to operate. In a short period of time, you can take better photographs. The camera has a wide angle, a small macro (25mm), stabilization, and a camera function.

In conclusion, the Canon 60D is a good DSLR.

The picture quality is much stronger than that of the card machine.

The best may not be the most durable Sigma Sigma is not as famous as Canon, but its card camera DP2 costs about 5200 yuan, which is close to SLR**, which can be regarded as the aristocracy of the card machine.

Well-known big brands such as Canon, Nikon, and Sony are all good!

It is recommended that you buy the Canon ixus95, which is small and stylish, and focuses on quality and effect.

The national average price is 1580 yuan.

10 million effective pixels.

There is a face recognition function.

There is a camera function.

Optical zoom.

Fully automatic, with partial manual function.

LCD screen size.

inches, 230,000 pixels.

Stabilization. Optical image stabilization.

Personal advice and opinions for your reference:

Buying a camera is the same as buying a computer, and the one that suits you is the best.

Canon: Fast focusing speed Imaging color can Lens*** Lack of branches: price'Unreasonable.

Nikon: The imaging is sharp, the old optics are more trustworthy, and the disadvantages: The low-end machine is very poor, and the single shot is strong.

Sony: Good appearance and good after-sales Disadvantages: The effect is mediocre and the cost performance is seriously bad DC lens is a set'card.

Fujifilm: Good color, cost-effective, high ISO noise control'Good production Disadvantages: after-sales troubles The machine looks average.

Olympus: Good lens technology, good-looking machine Disadvantages: mediocre color, poor image stabilization.

Casio: The machine is very thin But the point: The machine is thin and it is all a disadvantage.

Kodak: Good price-performance ratio Color and dispersion control'Good production Disadvantages: ugly appearance The screen pixels are generally low.

Love'National: synonymous with cost-effective Disadvantages: I am a Chinese, don't talk about his shortcomings.

Samsung: Good looking Disadvantages: In addition to looking good, all are disadvantages.

Hello! Canon's digital cameras are known for their "clear imaging, realistic color reproduction, exquisite craftsmanship, and stable quality".

For example, the Canon ixus105 IS, which is currently on the market, is very suitable for shooting daily portraits of families, general cultural landscapes, and travel landscapes.

Effective pixels: 12.1 million pixels.

When shooting general landscapes, the Canon IXUS 105's metering is relatively accurate, so it can be used with confidence.

When shooting portraits, the Canon Ixus 105 has a better reproduction of ** colors.

Advantages: Rich intelligent functions and mature image processing, it is easy to produce good films.

The metal body is small, lightweight, round, and thick, cute and durable.

In the case of a DSLR, Nikon, Canon.

The cards are not much different.

Canon is definitely the first choice, and of course, I personally think Nikon's is pretty good.

IMHO, the better quality is now a few big brands in Japan.

Panasonic, Sony, Fujifilm, Nikon, Olympus, Canon, JVC (Victory), etc.

Casio is good. The Casio ZR10 is a very good review, and it is a new product launched at the end of the year of the Casio Exilim series. The shutter speed of seconds is also possible, and high-speed continuous shooting can be realized.

With the EXILIM HS Engine, the interval between shots and then pressing the shutter can be reduced to seconds at a minimum, completely eliminating the time lag between shots with conventional digital cameras, so you don't have to wait.

The Casio ZR10 uses multiple CPUs and is equipped with the Exilim HS Engine to process images very quickly, solving the problem of long shooting intervals in card players. It only takes seconds to capture wonderful moments. In addition, the powerful CASIO engine can also realize high-speed continuous shooting, and take photos while recording.