One more step of truth, even one more step in the same direction, and it becomes something absurd.

That's right. Truth is objective and accurate, and one more step or one less step is not truth, and if it is not truth, it will become absurd.

In ancient times, there was an old woman who always cried in front of a temple, crying in the sky, and crying in the rain. People called her a weeping woman.

One day, an old monk asked her, "Old man, why are you crying so sadly?" The old woman said

I have two daughters, the eldest sells umbrellas and the younger sells cloth shoes. When the weather is fine, the eldest daughter's umbrella cannot be sold; On a rainy day, no one went to buy the little daughter's cloth shoes. They can't earn money, but how can they live!

I get sad when I think about it. People, why is it so difficult? After saying that, he began to cry again sadly and timidly.

Old woman, why don't you think the other way around? On a sunny day, your youngest daughter's shoe store is in front of the market; Pedestrians on the street on rainy days are running to your eldest daughter's umbrella shop. Wouldn't it be less bitter in that way?

The old woman felt that his words made sense, and she listened to his advice. Since then, she laughs from ear to ear every day, and the crying woman becomes a laughing woman.

Philosophical truths are conditional. Any truth has its own conditions and scope, and if it goes beyond this condition and scope, it only takes one more step, even a small step in the same direction, and the truth will become a fallacy. This story illustrates that it is difficult to judge whether a knowledge is true or not without certain conditions.

Due to people's different standpoints, viewpoints, and methods, and different knowledge structures, cognitive abilities, and levels of understanding, each person will have many different understandings of the same real object, but no matter what, there is only one correct understanding, that is, there can only be one truth.

No, it has to be reasonable, and there is no reason at all.

Answer]: a, b

Truth and falsehood are the unity of opposites. Opposition means that the distinction between the two within a certain scope is absolute and cannot be confused. Unity means:

On the one hand, truth and falsehood exist in comparison and struggle with each other. On the other hand, truth and falsehood can be transformed into each other under certain conditions. The transformation of truth into error is mainly manifested in the fact that truth is concrete, and any truth has its applicable conditions and scope, and if it exceeds the conditions and scope of its application, the truth will become false. What is wrong under one condition may become a correct understanding or conclusion under another.

Therefore, AB is selected for this question.

This phrase speaks of a philosophical paradox, the "sorites paradox", also known as the "continuity paradox" or "stone-stacking paradox".

The paradox of one more small step refers to the fact that in a sequence of continuity, if only a little bit is changed each time, then there will eventually be a paradox: something or proposition that is originally true will become wrong because of one more small step.

For example, if there is a pile of sand, we can think of it as a pile of sand. If we keep taking away the sand, one grain at a time, then eventually there will be a problem: at some point, we will find that this is no longer a pile of sand, because after taking a grain of sand, the object we call "a pile of sand" has changed, and this change may be insignificant, but it does exist.

This paradox reveals some of the problems that people face in their thought processes, such as how to define a sequence of continuity bases, how to determine the magnitude of each change, and so on. This paradox also reminds us that when dealing with some complex issues, we need to pay attention to the changes at each step to avoid conclusions that do not correspond to the actual situation.

In conclusion, the paradox of taking one more small step is a philosophical paradox that reminds us that when thinking and dealing with problems, we need to pay attention to the changes of each step so as not to appear conclusions that do not conform to the actual situation.

This sentence alone contains that the truth is absolute, and it is not enough to take one more step, so choose A

But philosophical questions rarely have a correct answer, and it is not the original intention of philosophy, and the same is true of the question of truth and falsehood. Was Lenin's original intention correct? It's still a puzzle, at least philosophically.

I think it's more important to convey to students the various plausible statements about truth and falsehood than the answer to this question.

Alas, I really don't understand why philosophy and exam-oriented education are put together, completely incompatible, as a kind of human rational thinking and exploration, but what standard answer is imprisoned, all thinking starts from the standard answer, and then finds evidence for the correctness of the standard answer, what kind of rotten thing is this? It is hard to imagine that students will be able to grasp this spirit of philosophy after they have finished it, and it is estimated that there will be nothing left but rote memorization and hatred of philosophy.

This sentence is to explain option A, and the stem is to show that the boundary between truth and falsehood is very clear, and as long as you go a little more, it is a false ......Although the meaning of option D is correct, but this question alone cannot explain this option, but we are deeply influenced by philosophy in the depths of our brains to feel that D is correct, but when people who are strangers to philosophy read this question, they definitely choose A for the question stem, and although the meaning of option D is correct, it cannot be selected here, and A should be chosen

You are wrong, not d, if there is an option "Truth is conditional." Any truth has its own applicable conditions and scope" just choose this, but if you don't have it, A, D is absolutely wrong, truth is the unity of relativity and absoluteness, and you are a high school political science teacher, how did you learn philosophy in college?

Truth is absolute, conditional, and beyond the limits of conditions is falsehood. And in the range of conditions he is absolute.

There is a sentence called "dare not cross the thunder pool half a step", which originally referred to not crossing the thunder pool, and the latter metaphor did not dare to exceed a certain range and boundary.

The title is very similar to this sentence. I think it's the right choice A.

A test question analysis: truth is conditional, any truth has its own conditions and scope of adaptation, if beyond this condition and scope, as long as you take a small step, even if it is a small step in the same direction, the truth will become a fallacy. Therefore, the question emphasizes the conditionality of truth, the boundary between truth and falsehood is not to be confused, and the answer A is correct; Truth and falsehood often go hand in hand, and therefore bspeak falsely; c. The statement is wrong; d has nothing to do with the title.

c?Truth and falsehood can be transformed under certain conditions, so they are correct; The content has nothing to do with the source of the question;Target? The content is that hail with oak adheres to the principle of moderation and meets the requirements of the stem; It is not directly related to the stem.

c. This question tests the knowledge of truth. Truth is a philosophical category that marks the conformity of subjectivity and objectivity, and is the correct reflection of objective things and their laws. The material in the question shows that truth is concrete and conditional, truth and falsehood go hand in hand, and there is no insurmountable gap between truth and falsehood.

Based on this, the answer to this question can be selected as i.e., item c. There is a clear line between truth and falsehood, so statements are false and cannot be selected; The statement is wrong and cannot be selected.