Jiang Shuying s lack of love is more terrible than not getting married, everyone s view of love is d

Everyone is an independent individual, so the concept of love is also different, Jiang Shuying's lack of love is more terrible than not getting married, I agree with this sentence. My view of love is mainly to have love and financial support. It can be summarized in the following three points.

1. Lovers must be supported by love.

This coincides with Jiang Shuying's view that not loving is more terrible than not getting married. A loveless marriage is just the most familiar stranger to a family, respecting each other and not interfering with each other, so a loveless marriage is better than never existing. Nowadays, there are many men and women, just because they are suitable, they have never thought about love or not, even though the precept of marriage first and then love exists, but how many such people are there?

So love is also essential. Life is not **, ** is not reality, but sometimes life is more exciting than **.

Second, the family portal between couples should be comparable

In ancient times, it has always been important to pay attention to the right person, and this sentence is still good today. How many couples have been broken up because the door is not right, and finally came to the end of breaking up. When there is too much difference between them in terms of family conditions or economic conditions, it will only create more and more contradictions, and in the end, the intensification of contradictions will only end in a breakup.

This is not what we want to see. The economy is a little worse, so that you can better find the advantages of the other party.

3. Couples need to pay attention to similar interests.

To take a simple example, a college graduate who graduated from a bachelor's degree and found a girl who graduated from junior high school as a girlfriend, then they initially fell in love with each other and had a similar family background, but as they gradually understood each other and the friction of small things in life, they will eventually find that there are too few common topics between them, and they can only break up.

Therefore, in my opinion, the best way for couples to get along with each other should be both lovers and friends, so that true love should be what it looks like.

My view of love is that character is more important than money, as long as the person has good character and self-motivation, it is more important than anything.

My view of love should be, don't settle in love, but find your own true love.

My concept of love is to find the person I love in the future, she also loves me, life is simple, as long as it is the right person.

My view of love is to find someone I love, and the other party can give me a sense of security, so that I will go on with the other person.

So, I think marriage is just a formality, if two people don't love each other, but just get married for the sake of getting married, it's terrible, and it will always torment one or two parties.

I think the meaning of this sentence is that a marriage without love is more terrible than not getting married, because a marriage without love, both parties will be in pain and will be hurt, and that is a kind of mutual torture, and without marriage, there is no harm and pain, and there is suffering, so it is more terrible to say that not loving is worse than not getting married.

I think that as long as there is love, anything can be changed, even if you don't want to get married, it may be because you love this person too much and want to give this person a stable home, and then choose to get married.

Because the ultimate goal of love is to enter marriage, and love that does not want to enter marriage is to consume each other in vain, so it is better not to love.

I think it makes sense, if there is no love, then the meaning of marriage is not very great, and in the end it may be the result of losing both, so it is better not to get married.

I think it's the same way, if you find someone you don't love at all, then I think it's more terrible than not getting married, and it's better to live alone.

Jiang Shuying said this point of view is too right, this sentence also tells the true meaning of marriage, what is the purpose of our marriage, most people when choosing marriage, often choose a person with more suitable attributes, rather than a person who really loves, this is a fact, most people wear utilitarian glasses when choosing marriage, and there is no way to choose a person who enters marriage simply because of love.

If your marriage partner is the person you love and the person who loves you, then you are a lucky person, but most people are not like this, I analyze my own experience from a man's point of view, and draw a conclusion, in fact, when men choose a marriage partner, they often choose a standard configuration according to their own ability, for example, what kind of girlfriend do I choose when I have 10 million, what kind of girlfriend I will choose when I have 1 million, Later, I only had 100,000 yuan, what kind of girlfriend did I choose, so this choice of marriage has penetrated too many secular concepts, did you choose a loved one, or did you choose a suitable person to marry? But either way, a marriage without love is obviously more terrible.

To sum up, people nowadays are more realistic and often ignore the essence of love because of material things, but a marriage without love is undoubtedly a sadness.

This statement is very correct, because if two people are no longer in love, they are just living together, and life will have no quality at all.

This point of view must be very correct, if two people just don't get married, but they have feelings, it's also very good, but if two people don't have feelings after getting married, it's really scary.

This statement is very correct, if there is no relationship between two people at all, even if they get married, they may not be happy.

That's right. If two people don't love each other and get married, life after marriage will be very painful, it is better not to get married, marriage is for happiness, and it is painful not to love.

I think this statement is more correct, because if there is no love, then you don't have seven emotions and six desires.

Correct, marriage must be built on the basis of love, otherwise it is difficult to have the courage to face the trivial things after marriage.

I think this statement is indeed true, because if you don't get married, you may change for yourself later. If you don't love it, you will destroy yourself directly.

Therefore, Jiang Shuying thinks that a marriage without love is terrible, and I think it is very reasonable.

Of course, you should agree, if the relationship between two people is not deep enough and they enter the marriage, it may be very painful, and they will even divorce very early.

It depends on everyone's experience and attitude towards life, in fact, many times a marriage with love will be consumed into a loveless marriage by the firewood, rice, oil, salt, sauce, vinegar and tea in life, and it depends on your own choice at this time. In fact, love is really to find someone to live with, as long as two people can respect each other, it is not a kind of happiness.

agree, a marriage without love will not go through hardships, both parties are more likely to change their minds, and such a marriage will not last long.

Of course, such a view should be agreed, because a marriage without love is like a house without a foundation, which can collapse at any time.

I think it should. A marriage without love can't last long, it's just a muddy life. Isn't it wonderful to live alone?

I think I agree with Jiang Shuying's point of view, a loveless marriage is really terrible, how can you live happily without loving each other, so marriage can't be compromised.

Yes, only when two people have love can they live happily, and there will be fewer conflicts between the two.

Love and marriage are two different things. Love is not a necessity of life, nor is it a necessity of marriage, marriage is more of a responsibility, a union of two families. Therefore, many people are not suitable for marriage, and overly idealized love often cannot withstand reality.

But if the parties' own capital is superior to a certain extent, they can defeat life.

I don't think so, long-term love in marriage is almost non-existent, no matter how fierce the love between the two is, it will gradually evolve into family affection in a long-term marriage, and now many people's union is not for love, just to be able to live together.

For many people, love is not a necessity, and it is okay not to fall in love, but marriage is a necessity, and you must get married.

Love is not necessarily a necessity, and it is also dispensable for some people who don't want to fall in love.

If two people are together and can go into married life, then there must be love as a guarantee, because life is very trivial, and only when you love each other can you tolerate each other.