Can you guess who the winner is? Why?

1.If the fighting time is short, the attacking team is more likely to win, because the fighting strength of the winner and the winner in a short period of time is quite different, and the stronger one is more likely to attack, and relevant information can be obtained according to the position before the start.

2.If the fighting time is long, the person with a messy footprint is more likely to lose, because the strength of the two is not much different, and the person who is better prepared for the whole fighting process and has a better grasp of the situation on the field has a better chance of winning.

Your question is not very rigorous, and it is impossible to judge what you said so far. For example, you don't even know whose footprint it is, how can you tell?

Suppose you know which footprint is whom. There is some logic:

1. Those who retreat are not necessarily losers.

2. The footprints from shallow to deep do not necessarily mean that he is tired, it may be that he is hitting hard in the later stage.

But you can use the depth of the footprints to write his power state, and use the position of the footprints to judge the offensive and defensive positions of the two people.

If the fight is determined by hitting the opponent's effective position, it will be useless because there is no way to see the status of the block.

Look at the footprints. The attacker struggles on the forefoot. The defender struggles on the back of the foot. Push from back to front to the position where A was already standing at the beginning of the fight.

Go and report the crime, and the criminal investigation technology may be able to identify it! ~

It is not difficult to "There is no rainy day and no cloudy day, there is no lake in the field, and there is no tide in the river" This is the word "month".

You say that this word is not difficult to guess, a pair is a good partner" is the word "friend" "rainy days are not sunny days, there are no embankments in the fields, and there is no Guiyang in Yunnan" This is the word "day" "You riddle me if the mystery is a pair, everywhere is bright" is the word "Ming" to adopt.

In the old man's riddle, "cloudy day", "lake", and "tide" all have a common word "month", and "rainy day", "field", and "river" do not have a common word, and the shepherd boy guessed that it was "month", and then used the riddle to guess the old man, and the old man guessed that it was a "friend" synthesized for two months. In the mystery of the shepherd boy, "sunny day", "embankment", "Guiyang" all have a "day" word, and "rainy day", "field", "Yunnan" also do not share the word, the old man also guessed that it is the word "day", and the riddle is riddled: "you riddle me if the riddle is a pair", "day" and "moon" are "bright", of course it will be "bright".

Therefore, there are four riddles in this riddle: the main riddle is "month" and "day", and the riddle is "friend" and "ming".

The old man's is the moon.

The shepherd boy is the day.

Together, it is clear.

They are the month and the day, and together they are the light.

The first one in the month! A good couple is a friend! So the first one is the month! The second is the day! Guiyang and sunny days only have Japanese characters!

There are no rainy days, no clouds, no lakes in the fields, no rivers and no tides"Friends"Word.

There are no rainy days, no sunny days, no embankments in the fields, and no Guiyang in Yunnan"Chang"Word.

1 horse, 2 swallows.

3 rats. 4 pigs, 5 crabs.

6 thrushes.

This is a deceptive riddle, and there are a lot of people around my house who do this riddle guessing prize!

Horses, butterflies, water dragons, wild cats, monks, chickens, deer, cranes, turtles, thrushes, snakes, peacocks, tigers, ducks, swallows, pigs, dogs, flying dragons, domestic cats, crabs, cows, sheep, earthworms, pigeons, hedgehogs, frogs, yellow eels, mice!

Brothers; You're level 4, and you're still playing this? Is it a lie or a lie?

Friend, I'm doing a task, if it helps you, please give me some encouragement, thank you!

Die.

Crying and mourning? Or neuropathy?

There is no winner, each has its own reason, Zhuangzi wins in debating skills, Huizi wins in logical reasoning.

Zhuangzi and Huizi Swim in Haoliang" is a quotation discussion in the "Zhuangzi Qiushui" in the outer chapter of "Zhuangzi", created in the Warring States Period, describing a small debate between Zhuangzi and Huizi when they played on the Haoshui Bridge.

A strong argument, a clever argument; One is truth-seeking, one is beautiful; One is obsessive, one is detached; It makes people smile and ponder for a long time after reading it.

Work appreciation: This article tells the story of two debaters, swimming together on a bridge in Haoshui, looking down on the minnows swimming freely, thus arousing associations, a debate about whether people can know the joy of fish. Although the topic is small, its purpose is very large. Except for the first sentence, which uses narrative language to explain the background of the story, the whole text is in the form of dialogue.

The method of attacking the shield of the son with the spear of the son has led this debate to a deeper level.

Zhuang Zhou affirmed that he could know the joy of fish, but Hui Shi denied Zhuang Zhou's statement. Not to mention who is right and wrong in this debate, just the quick thinking and wise conversation reflected by the two in the debate are amazing, giving people a pleasant and intellectual enjoyment.

The brilliance of the "Debate of Hao Liang", in addition to the eloquence of the two, lies in its infinite charm. Both sides of the debate are on topic, but the debaters think very differently. Hui Shi is from the law of cognition, people and fish are two different creatures, and it is impossible for people to feel the joys, sorrows, and sorrows of fish.

Answer: Zhuangzi. I have heard Yi Zhongtian comment.

From the movements of the fish, Zhuangzi experienced that kind of leisurely mood, showing an attitude of inaction, so that he could be happy.

Keiko didn't understand the mystery, and asked Zhuangzi: "How do you know?" ”

He said, "I know it from here." ”

The meaning of these words is timeless.

In the debate of the pre-Qin princes, the failure was generally not recorded in the writings, but the Zhuangzi people recorded, which means that it was a successful debate.

Upstairs is copied in a large section, does it make sense?

Zhuangzi won.

Zhuangzi affirmed that "the sea bass swims calmly", which is the "joy of fish", Huizi expressed doubts that "Zi is not a fish and knows the joy of fish", and Zhuangzi immediately shot back "Zi is not me, I know that I don't know the joy of fish", and "escape its origin", and distinguish that Huizi has affirmed Zhuangzi's "joy of knowing fish" when he spoke. Cleverly changed the concept, so that Keiko contradicted herself in her speech, and changed from passive to active.

They were both victors.

Only Jun fails.

There is no such thing as a loser or a winner.

1. a tortoise; 2. a swallow; 3. a frog; 4. a mouse; 5. Yellow Diet; 6. Butterfly!

I have a thia! 1. a tortoise; 2. a swallow; 3. a frog; 4. a mouse; 5. Yellow Diet; 6. Butterfly!

Like

1 Maolin - bees.

2 Han Yun - Cow.

3 Jiang Temple - Flying Dragon.

1.Water Dragon 2Cattle 3Frogs, 4 horses, 5 dogs, 6 pigeons.

Do everything possible (the quadrature of a thousand, calculated in hundreds).

Land travel (hit an ancient writer) land tour.

European Experiences (Playing a Classical ** Name) Journey to the West.

99 (guess one idiom) one out of a hundred.

The article is repeated (typed for a word) enough.

1.Lu.

2.Journey.

3.One in a hundred or one in a hundred.

4.Enough (i.e. multiple sentences).

Land Tour Journey to the West.

There is no one in a hundred, one in a hundred is one in a hundred... Enough.

1. Land tour.

2, Marco. Polo's Travels.

Land Tour Journey to the West.

Nothing is enough.

1. I still think about you in the twilight.

2. I've been in love with you all the time.

3. My Emei faction abandons the dark and turns to the light.

4. Although I am very poor, I have backbone.

There are three answers.

Statement 1: I still think about you in the twilight.

Claim 2: I've always loved you deeply.

What's more interesting is.

Argument 3: My Emei faction abandons darkness and turns to light.