The harm that reading brings to human beings, and the harm of reading people

I'm not afraid to know, I'm not afraid to know everything, I'm afraid to know a little. There are two sides to things, and reading a book can indeed make people absorb knowledge, but sometimes it is likely that the things described in the book are one-sided or even wrong because of the one-sidedness of the things described in the book.

There are few objective descriptions of the things in the book, and many of them are deliberately or unintentionally added to their own opinions, so that readers are affected by them and cannot understand the connotation well.

It is often said, "Open books are beneficial." But on closer inspection, this statement is not entirely true.

If we are interested in every book, then "open books are beneficial" is not necessarily beneficial. Some students like to read martial arts, romance and other ** books, sometimes to the extent that they forget to sleep and eat, and they can't let go of the book. Once they enter the "role" in the book, they go crazy, then they only think about the book in class, and they don't have the heart to study, and their grades plummet.

What's more, they are attracted to the characters in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes even go down the path of crime. Why is "open book" so serious? It's mostly about what books I'm reading.

If everyone reads books that are unhealthy or inappropriate for the body and mind, it will hurt themselves. We must be vigilant against books that lead people astray! Although the plot of such a book is intricate, the better it looks, the more it will make you fall deep, so we must carefully look for books that are beneficial to ourselves in the vast sea of books, so that it is called the real "open book is beneficial"!

Fielding once said, "A bad book, like a bad friend, can hurt you." ”

Reading can increase people's knowledge, cultivate their temperament, and cultivate their body and mind. It is only a necessary condition for "beneficial", not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness." "Since books are medicines, they have two functions:

One is good medicine, medicine to get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 20s, many people were considered Hitler's martyrs because they watched Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and were badly influenced by it.

A bad book is like a bad friend, it can kill you." It is not false at all, reading those grotesque books all day long, and "throwing" the homework aside, resulting in a continuous decline in academic performance, and finally creating a bamboo basket for nothing. Think about it, can it be said that "opening" such a book "volume" is "beneficial"?

A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what kind of book is opened.

A philosopher once said that people who are able to consume the necessary nutrients are healthier than those who eat a lot. At the same time, true scholars are often not people who read books, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously when they read books, they just flip through the pages casually, some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude.

The idiom "open book is beneficial" naturally has its positive meaning as an emphasis on the importance of reading, but it is inappropriate to use it as an assertion that "open book" is "beneficial".

In the fall, just in the climb up.

This sentence should be a motivating sentence that encourages people to succeed if they are not afraid of failure.

Not long ago, a habitual offender had just been released from prison, and he was arrested for committing a crime in the place where he had missed. In the fall, just in the climb up.

Books are a kind of power, and you can use this power for good or evil.

A book can also be said to be a tool, like a knife, that you can use to help others or to kill.

Books are also symbols of knowledge, like the atomic bomb is the product of knowledge, whether this thing is good or bad does not depend on the person who uses it, whether it is intended to benefit mankind or create disasters for mankind.

A bit off topic, what you want is a concrete example of the harm that reading brings to humanity.

Reading is harmful to the weak-willed, because you can't stick to the last true meaning. It's hurtful for people who are thirsty for knowledge, because you feel more and more ignorant.

The key is to "unite knowledge and action", otherwise no matter how much you read, you can't apply what you have learned, and it will be useless after all.

Reading really doesn't hurt human beings, books are not medicines, but prescriptions, it leaves you the right to choose, and challenges your judgment.

Reading can be harmful, but it is due to a combination of many other factors.

Useless is a scholar! Classic!

The dogmatism that books bring.

Well, hello. Strictly speaking, I am also a reader, but I have come into contact with people who read books and those who do not read because of my work, so let me talk about the difference between them.

Pros and cons of readers1. Reading can increase our knowledge, and we can know the world without going out.

2. It can improve our reading ability, writing level, and thinking ability.

3. It can make us self-cultivated, tasteful and temperamental.

4. It can enable us to find good jobs and change the fate of poverty.

5. It can make us invincible in the fierce competition.

Disadvantages of reading people:

1. It is not easy to control your emotions.

2. No confidence in life.

3. Some people think that it will affect the time of play, feel tired, etc.

Pros and cons of people who don't read1.If you don't study, you don't know how high the sky is and how big the earth is, and all the way out depends on the polishing of the society, so that the tempering of the society can sum up your experience.

2.There won't be much desire.

3.Simple life.

4.Low awareness, no brains.

5.Unconstrained.

6.The less you know, the choice won't be too tangled.

7.Effortless eyes.

8.If you don't read, your desire to consume will be lower.

9.It doesn't take much time to think about right and wrong.

10.On paper, I finally feel shallow, and I never know that I have to do it.

Disadvantage

1。Behind the times.

2. Knowing the void and grasping the knowledge is shallow, and the poor Qing does not use a lot of modern products.

3. Fewer friends because others do not have a common language with you.

4. Be easily deceived, you can't tell the truth from what others say.

5 is not good for future generations, they are all ignorant and ignorant, and they can't teach the next generation at all.

When you read a lot of books, you tend to copy the content of the book. Make yourself stupid and lose your vitality.

Some of the current books do not publicize pornography and violence, which have a great impact on the physical and mental health of young people. The problem of juvenile delinquency is on the rise.

Reading books for a long time can make the brain react slowly, that is, the thinking becomes sluggish.

Some of today's books are very expensive and tend to make them unaffordable.

What are the disadvantages of reading a book?

1. Cause myopia and damage eyesight.

2, it is easy to become stupid when you read too many dead books.

3. Books are all written by people, and there are different points of view. I know too much, but I am at a loss.

4. Some old books are printed in lead, which can lead to lead poisoning in readers.

5. Nowadays, the price of books is high, and it is really a luxury burden to love reading.

6. It is better to believe in the book than to have no book 1As the saying goes, literacy begins with a foolish life.

2.As the saying goes, the more you read, the more confused you get. The more I read, the more I don't understand, the more confused I become.

3.As the saying goes, Xiucai rebelled for three years, which shows that reading is not good.

4.As the saying goes, useless is a scholar.

5.Ranked ninth, low status.

6.A lot of times, bad ideas. The crooked methods are all made by readers. At that time, people felt that animals were stronger than people. I think there are several main disadvantages of reading too many books:

1. Reading is time-consuming;

2. Reading for a long time is easy to cause fatigue, and if you don't pay attention to your reading posture, it is easy to cause myopia;

3. If you read too many books, you will consciously or unconsciously follow other people's ideas, and be influenced by the plot in the book to imitate others' words and actions, etc., and change your personality;

4. If you don't pay attention to the choice of reading, reading too many bad books, it is easier to learn bad behaviors and enhance the ability to do bad things (for example: learning criminal psychology, which can teach you how to escape the tracking of the police, etc.).

Look at the readers. Asking about the meaning of life all day long, eating an egg considers the question of whether there is a chicken or an egg first; Do things to consider whether it is in line with book etiquette and the righteousness of life; If things don't go well, you must first blame the birth at the wrong time, and the talent is not met; Marrying a wife is to complain that spiritual harmony cannot be achieved; When committing suicide, you also need to consider which poetry book to bring. One by one, he sighed and sighed, Gu Ying felt self-pity, he was really the most unhappy person in the world.

Of course, reading about the transcendent realm like Confucius is a different matter. But how many people can read through it? Therefore, Lao Tzu said that there is no need to worry about learning, and the ancients said that a woman is virtuous if she is not talented, which makes sense.