Some say that Japan s economy, technology, and industry are dependent on the United States 5

To be precise, Japan's achievements today were all due to the Americans at the beginning, after Japan's defeat in World War II, the manufacturing industry suffered a serious setback, and no one bought Japanese products, and it coincided with the Korean War, the United States used Japan as a supply base for equipment and ammunition, ordered a large number of arms, and brought Japan a very valuable original capital, and at the same time, the United States itself also wanted to support Japan as a junior brother, and there was also some help in science and technology. But then it was different, Japan once jumped to the second place in the world in the 80s, becoming the biggest threat to the United States, the United States did everything possible to suppress Japan, on the one hand, restricting Japan's exports to the country, and dumping goods on Japan through diplomacy, but also forcing the yen to appreciate, resulting in a serious setback to the Japanese economy. Therefore, at this time, there is no dependence between Japan and the United States, but a competitive relationship.

Taking a current example, the sales of Japanese cars in China have far surpassed those of the United States, so it is completely clear that the Japanese economy has gradually moved away from the United States and is being accepted by more countries.

: In the 80s, Japan's economy once surpassed that of the United States.

I don't think that if the U.S. doesn't suppress Japan, Japan's various industries won't necessarily be more developed. There are no absolutes in everything, we can't make things absolute, the most important thing is to analyze and explain from different aspects, so let's look at my thoughts.

First, Japan will develop better after separating from the United States.

As everyone knows, Japan has always been the little brother of the United States and has been under pressure from the United States. If the United States lets go of its suppression of Japan, then Japan will dare to develop its own industry, and it can also introduce a large number of talents and advanced technology to improve itself.

From this point of view, Japan's industry will develop well. If the United States gives up suppressing countries around the world, then countries like Syria will also develop well, or at least more peacefully. Therefore, does the United States need to reflect on itself, not to engage in so-called "friendship" to suppress its own "friends", and to improve itself rather than suppress the development of other countries?

Second, Japan may not develop better after separating from the United States.

I don't think Japan will develop better after it gets free from the pressure of the United States. Because Japan itself is an island country, the land area is very small, the resources are not abundant at all, there is a shortage of talents, and there is a shortage of labor.

The reason why Japan has been able to willingly become the younger brother of the United States is also because the United States has given Japan some benefits. For example, the sharing of science and technology, preferential transportation of imported goods, etc., Japanese leaders are not fools, they must have taken into account their own national conditions before making decisions.

Without the United States, Japan's power will be greatly weakened, its own people's livelihood foundation will not be guaranteed, and Paris will be able to develop other industries, so I don't think it will be good for Japan to develop without the control of the United States.

3. Objectively evaluate everything.

I think we need to learn to evaluate everything objectively. As far as this matter is concerned, we should analyze things from a macro perspective, not with personal feelings. In my heart, I deeply hate what Japan and the United States are doing, but when I look at it from my emotions, Japan's development is not clear.

If that were the case, their various industries would not be as developed as they are now. In that case, he will not be able to get help from the other party, and there may be no way to get to the point where he is now. Although his development is now somewhat restricted, if there is no help from the other party, then he has no chance to rise.

So everything is mutual, although it is said that they are suppressed by the other party, but they also get help from the other party.

If the United States had not suppressed Japan's various industries, would it have been more developed?

In fact, it won't be more developed, after all, if the other party doesn't suppress them, they won't help him. In this way, they will not have so many resources and so many development opportunities. Because as a defeated country in World War II, they could not do without the help of the other side to rise so quickly after the end of the war.

The price to be paid is to be limited by the other party, which is a complementary process for them.

If it weren't for the United States, wouldn't Japan's various industries be more developed?

In fact, it will not be more developed, after all, if there is no other party, they will not get so many development opportunities. After all, there are both positive and negative aspects to everything, and if they want to get help from the other party, then they must be suppressed by the other party. Because this is a fact that cannot be changed, after all, at the beginning, people did not let him develop into a strong country.

So they've been able to get to the point where they're doing it now.

Tips

Without the suppression of the other party, their various industries would not be more developed than they are now, and may even be worse than they are now. The reason why it has developed into what it is now is because of the help of the other party. There are two sides to everything he does, and the other party will not help him for no reason, so there must be suppression.

Since you have accepted the help of the other party, it is inevitable that you must bear the pressure of the other party. So if there was no suppression from the other party, then they would not have developed into what they are now.

Of course, if they are not restricted, then the positive condiments may be much higher, and the military strength will be greatly improved.

If Japan is not constrained by the United States, its economic aggregate will be a little higher than it is now, and its military strength will be greatly enhanced, second only to the United States, slightly worse than China and Russia, or even comparable.

If the United States does not suppress Japan, will Japan's various industries be more developed?

Disadvantages:

Japan's small and medium-sized industrial enterprises are greatly affected by the operation of large factories because of their small capital scale and small production volume, and because many small and medium-sized enterprises rely on orders from large factories for production, their operation is not stable enough.

If the boom of large factories declines, small and medium-sized factories will be required to reduce their products, and many large Japanese companies will buy foreign products one after another, and some large companies will move their factories to Asian countries with low labor costs to directly produce parts, and the situation of small and medium-sized enterprises in Japan has become difficult.

Japan's economy continues to slump, and small and medium-sized enterprise bankruptcies are on the rise.

The disadvantage of Japan's industrial development is the lack of mineral resources.

Japan is poor in natural resources, and except for a very small amount of mineral resources such as coal, natural gas, and sulfur, all other major raw materials and fuels needed for industrial production must be imported from overseas.

As Japan is an island country, it is extremely poor in resources, and it is the country with the largest import of resources and the highest degree of dependence on foreign countries in the world.

Its industry has developed from labor-intensive and resource-intensive to technology-intensive and high-tech.

1. Industrial development.

Japanese industry was badly damaged in World War II. After the war, Japan successively introduced advanced technology from the United States and other industrial countries, developed new products, established its own technological system, and developed rapid industrial development.

2. Japan's industrial and oil crisis.

In 1973, when Japanese industry was developing smoothly, the first world oil crisis broke out, and the rise of oil had a huge impact on Japanese industry, which produced from imported raw materials. Under these circumstances, Japan was able to overcome the oil crisis by actively developing fuel-saving products and improving product quality.

3. Overseas production of manufacturing industry.

Japanese industrial products have excellent performance and are very popular in overseas markets. In the 80s, as a large number of Japanese industrial products were sold abroad, Japan's surplus continued to grow, and the friction with other countries increased. In order to reduce the surplus, Japanese companies began to enter the European and American markets, set up companies locally, local procurement, local production.

After 1985, the yen appreciated sharply, the competitiveness of Japanese products declined, and export manufacturers moved their factories to Asian countries with low labor costs, reducing production costs, and the overseas production of Japanese manufacturing increased significantly. However, as factories gradually moved overseas, domestic production declined, which is known as "industrial hollowing-out".

4. Developed industry.

Japan is one of the world's largest industrial nations. Japan's heavy industries include the metal industry, the machinery industry, and the chemical industry; Light industries include the textile industry, the food industry, the kiln industry, the paper and pulp industry, and other industries. In 1997, the machinery industry accounted for the total industrial production, metals, food, chemicals, textiles, and others.

Answer D: This question mainly tests the knowledge of Japan. The disadvantages of Japan's industrial development are its small territory and lack of resources, especially cotton and iron ore, which all need to be imported.

Advantageous: (1) Japan is an island country, with a tortuous coastline and many excellent harbors, because it takes advantage of excellent maritime conditions to develop export processing industries, so the maritime transportation industry can be vigorously developed and provide a transportation base. (2) In line with the layout principle of "close to the consumer market and close to the foreign seaport", the industrial belt is concentrated in the Pacific coast and the Seto Inland Sea coast.

It not only saves land resources, transportation and production costs, but also facilitates exports. Disadvantages: (1) Due to Japan's lack of mineral resources, raw materials and fuels are heavily dependent on imports, and a large number of imports are needed to develop processing.

2) Heavily dependent on the international market, Japan is narrow and densely populated, and due to its limited consumption capacity, the domestic market is narrow, and it is greatly affected by the financial crisis. (Reference: What the teacher said is summarized, I don't know if I understand it correctly.)

Pros There is no need for raw resources, and products can be produced with the help of European and American technology (including Japan's own technology) and sold to developing countries, which saves the use of raw resources in their own countries, and is seriously affected by the global economic climate, or once technology loses its absolute leadership, it will have a devastating blow to the Japanese economy.

Agreeing with the statement above, Japan has abandoned the foundation and has chosen high and new technology to develop its own economy, and it is very easy to be affected and restricted by various external factors.

In the vernacular: If other countries do not import mineral resources to Japan, Japan will be in trouble.

The herd effect is the right solution.

In the 70s, Japan's economy developed rapidly, a large number of Japanese goods poured into the United States, and at the same time, the Japanese bought a large number of American real estate, causing unrest in the United States, so Japan was forced to sign the Plaza Agreement, the dollar depreciated sharply and the yen appreciated, thereby temporarily increasing the purchasing power of the yen, prompting the Japanese to invest their surplus funds in real estate, finance and other fields instead of manufacturing and other basic industries, forming a bubble economy.

After the bubble economy caused by this blind investment burst, Japan began a decade-long recession.

I don't know how it works. You just look at how big the U.S. is, how big Japan is, how much GDP the U.S. has at that time and how much Japan is, how much the U.S. population is, how much Japan is, and ultimately how much the U.S. industrial manufacturing capacity is and what Japan is. It's like two people wrestling, one has the physical strength to run a marathon, and the other has only enough physical strength to run 100 meters, which one do you say is unlucky in the end?

You're looking for a related economic term.

The herd effect: "I think it's the right solution.

The so-called flock is a very scattered organization, usually together also blindly rushing left and right, but once one of the sheep moves, the other sheep will also rush up without thinking, completely ignoring the wolf next to it and the better grass not far away. The herd effect is a metaphor for people who have a herd mentality, which can easily lead to blind obedience, and blind obedience often falls into ** or fails.

Analogy is a metaphor for projects that are blindly launched and vague prospects that result from insufficient market research.

In Japan in the '80s, real estate was the sheep that ran into it.