Backgammon and Xiangqi which are the two types of chess that are more fun to play and a lot more

First of all, it should be explained that the professional game of backgammon stipulates that Black has a forbidden hand, which is different from the folk rules and is more complicated.

In fact, each has its own fun, and the way of thinking is different.

For example, chess can eat pieces, and there are fewer and fewer pieces; You can't eat pieces in backgammon, there will be more and more pieces; Xiangqi emphasizes tactics more and has complex changes; Gomoku focuses more on the perception of the chess shape, emphasizing logic and spatial thinking ability, and the calculation accuracy of each hand is very high.

However, both are facing problems, chess now has a lot of draws, indicating that there are not many changes that can be played, and some games also have the rules for winning with black chess, which can be seen, and you can also memorize the score to force a draw; The current rules of backgammon are also well studied, and many openings have been concluded, but there are also many attempts at new rules.

Backgammon is not like what ordinary people think is a simple thing, and it is not easier to play seriously than chess. As can be seen from the time it takes to play chess, large-scale competitions such as the national and world championships of chess take about 60-90 minutes per side; The National and World Championships are 90 and 135 minutes for each side.

It mainly depends on whether you are interested in the "dispatch generals" (Yunzi) type or the space shape type board game, of course, Go is more complicated, but it is too time-consuming to learn seriously, it depends on personal choice.

Chess requires a lot of intelligence, and the more fun it is.

Of course, backgammon is easy to play, and chess is ever-changing and complicated!

Of course, chess is fun, and there are many people who know it. Everywhere on the street, you can see people playing chess in a circle.

There is some truth to what the fourth floor said. Avoiding chess and chess, the current practice is generally to increase the value of the winner's points, for example, to earn 3 points for winning. and 1 point. Earn 0 points. This encourages the contestants to actively win.

Another way to do this is to add the rule of the promotion of the pawn and the elephant to compensate for the lack of chess strength, but this method has not yet been popularized and widely recognized.

If you think you're quite smart enough to play chess, but if you're average and you're not young, for example, you're already in high school, don't play chess, just play backgammon. If you don't play chess for more than ten years, you can't become a master.

Go is more fun.

Go, a strategic two-player chess game, was called "Yi" in ancient China and "go" in the West. It is popular in East Asian countries (China, Japan, South Korea, and North Korea), and is one of the four arts of qin, chess, calligraphy and painting.

Go originated in China, is said to have been written by Emperor Yao, and has been recorded in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. During the Sui and Tang dynasties, it was introduced to Japan through Korea and spread to Europe and the United States. Go contains the rich connotation of Chinese culture, and it is the embodiment of Chinese culture and civilization.

Features:

Go uses a rectangular checkerboard and black and white round chess pieces to play a game, the chessboard has 19 vertical and horizontal line segments to divide the chessboard into 361 intersections, the chess pieces walk on the intersection points, the two sides alternately move, can not move after falling, and the one with more enclosures wins.

Because Black has the advantage of occupying the land first, it is artificially required that Black give White a post at the end of the game. Go is considered the most complex board game in the world. Countries such as China, Japan, and South Korea have slightly different rules for the competition.

Backgammon and Xiangqi are easier to play, and Go is more complicated, but they are actually quite fun, and you need to study them carefully if you want to play them well.

Backgammon is the easiest, and if you connect your heart, you can win.

Chess is more like a battle between two armies, with limited resources in hand, how to win with minimal losses and keep the marshal.

Go is similar to annexation and cannibalization, which is a test of foresight and overall vision, from the first piece falls, you must know your layout, eat away the opponent, and win.

Go is similar to Xiangqi, but it is a different chess card, Go is more cautious and careful than Xiangqi, and if you make a wrong move, you may lose a large number of positions.

If you start, all three are very interesting and easy to get hooked on.

Summary. This is not necessarily, as long as he studies hard, he will always have a better side, there is a famous saying that God closes a door for you, he must open a window for you, so a stupid person, as long as he studies hard, Xiangqi backgammon will also play well. <>

<> can a person who is good at chess and backgammon mean that the person is smart? Or not necessarily.

It can only show that this person's logical thinking ability is not unusually strong, this smart, this word, it includes a lot of things, logical thinking ability is only one aspect, he also has fierce language, emotional intelligence and other aspects of the bridge. <>

Therefore, <> people who do not blindly play chess must be smart, this is only one aspect, if this person is more intelligent, he is more prominent <>in dealing with people, logical thinking ability, grinding language ability, adaptability, emotional intelligence, etc

<>So what if a person is stupid? Is backgammon never a good game?

There is a famous saying that God closes a door for you, and will definitely open a window for you to know the noise, so a relatively stupid person, as long as he studies hard, Xiangqi backgammon will also play very well. <>

Chess cultivates your overall concept and assesses the situation.

Backgammon develops your mathematical and logical deduction skills.

It's all good, it's very beneficial.

There is no good or bad, it's all entertainment. However, in terms of puzzles alone, chess is a little better, and it is a good exercise for people's thinking ability.

Backgammon and Xiangqi are both exercises for thinking skills, and I personally prefer backgammon.

Chess needs to die a lot of brain cells, and backgammon needs good eyesight.

In the big picture; Chess, of course.

In terms of skill and consideration of the big picture, chess is superior. But if you don't usually play a lot of chess, learning chess as soon as you start up can be boring and draining your patience. So I recommend that you can go to V X to play a small game of backgammon, like this [Meng Meng Gomoku] is quite good, usually fragmented time can be opened at any time to match a game, practice chess skills.

The board is full or white is one step later than black to five pieces.

When the board is about to be full, neither side can make a five-in-a-row, in which case it can be determined that both sides are a draw. Here's how I see it.

But the upstairs seems to be too complicated.

There is no place to go, and before the winner is compared, it is settled.

First of all, you need to know what the conditions for black and white to win. If, at the end of the game, both sides still fail to meet the conditions for victory, then they have to draw, which is understood from a theoretical level.

For example, under the rule of forbidden hands, black can only win in five consecutive rows, and white can win in five consecutive or long consecutive or black chess with a forbidden hand, if in the end, black and white have not formed a five-in-a-row, and white has not formed a long draw, or a black forbidden hand, then in this case, it is a theoretical draw.

Of course, in the actual game, the situation of draw is more complicated, such as the two sides in order to save physical strength, can negotiate a draw, etc., it is recommended that you read the "Chinese Gomoku Competition Rules", **is:

Summary. The same can't be said for this. Chess can be said to have something to do with talent, but it doesn't mean that you will never be able to play well. Sometimes it's really hard work to make up for clumsiness, stupid birds fly first, if you only consider talent and talent, you can't do anything, and the times won't develop.

<> can a person who is good at chess and backgammon mean that the person is smart? Or not necessarily.

This doesn't necessarily mean that.

Because according to the current development of science and technology, the development of computers. At present, it has been proved that backgammon, chess human beings are no longer the opponent of computer AI, so do you say that people are smart or computers are smart, no one, where is the computer with wisdom, there is no wisdom from Zen, where is artificial intelligence. That doesn't explain the problem.

<>So what if a person is stupid? Is backgammon never a good game?

The same can't be said for this. Chess can be said to have something to do with talent, but pretending is not to say that you will never be able to play well. Sometimes it's really hard work to make up for clumsiness, and the stupid bird hall is flying first, if you only consider talent and talent, you can't do anything, and the times won't develop.

For example, because no matter how fast the computing speed of the human sedan brain is, it can't be faster than the computer, so can everything in the future be relegated to the computer itself? People always have to rely on themselves, and the people who know the sedan chair are their own, and their efforts are also their own, but once they give up their efforts because of their talents, it is a complete failure.