-
Outsiders never know how deep a business's pit is.
-
He has some other problems that have not been ** out, so his pit is still very deep.
-
This reflects the existence of certain defects in domestic automobile manufacturing.
-
How deep it is may only be known by the manufacturers themselves.
-
It has a lot of manufacturing flaws, and it's hard to know how deep they are.
-
You're going to have to ask them about it, and the rest of the people know about it.
-
This is not something that we laymen can imagine.
-
That's why domestic cars aren't good in the market.
-
This is an aspect of the existence of these cars, after all, domestic cars.
-
It shows that its manufacturing is far from reaching the level of other foreign enterprises.
-
discredit the entire industry and make the public vigilant.
-
It discredits the brand and leaves a bad impression on consumers.
-
Sales will definitely decline, and the brand has one more failure in the eyes of the public.
-
Affecting the brand image of JAC Motors will also have a negative impact on the sales trend this year.
-
Reducing sales is certain and can have even more serious consequences.
-
It will cause a serious decline in sales, and the company will investigate and deal with it, and it will be reluctant.
-
It will have a little impact, because it will discredit the brand, so others will also reduce the consideration of the car when buying a car, which will inevitably affect sales.
-
Car sales will drop for a short period of time.
-
: will increase the amount of losses in 2018.
-
The impact of counterfeiting on brands is very bad, but some companies know that there will be such consequences, but they still embark on this path for the sake of profit. A few days ago, JAC Automobile was fined 100 million yuan by the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment for emission fraud, and JAC Automobile passed last night, saying that this incident will have an adverse impact on the company's performance.
Which products of JAC Motors have shoddy pollution control devices, and which models are "sold as products that pass the emission inspection"? It was not mentioned in this announcement.
On May 8, the relevant personnel of the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment also said in response to the inquiry of the 21st Century Business Herald, "Because it is a case that is still being processed, no conclusion has been drawn, and it is not convenient to disclose too specific information now, and the final result depends on the penalty decision." ”
However, a JAC insider said that the models accused of emission fraud by JAC this time are mainly commercial vehicles, and in the process of upgrading emission standards, the emission capacity of some trucks has not kept up, but the specific models and scale involved are not clear.
In fact, JAC has previously encountered the problem of "emission fraud". As early as 2014, when some areas took the lead in implementing the national IV emission standards, JAC heavy trucks were CCTV's "Focus Interview"**, which passed on the model and code of the engine on the vehicle certificate to pass off the national three as the national four.
At that time, JAC said that the behavior was committed by dealers and that sales channels would be strictly managed. However, the "Focus Interview" survey believes that this kind of emission fraud cannot be done without the cooperation of manufacturers.
The above-mentioned JAC insiders admitted frankly that JAC was "named and criticized" at that time, and objectively there were facts that violated laws and regulations, and they were later punished. However, he also stressed that the emission fraud was not a problem for JAC back then, "and this is true for commercial vehicles and even the entire automotive industry." ”
It is reported that JAC lost as much as 100 million yuan last year, and under the siege of many competitors, JAC sales have not achieved good results. It is worth noting that as early as 2014, CCTV passed the problem of JAC emission fraud, and now JAC is once again in trouble because of emission fraud, which is a big blow to the current JAC.
-
I don't think any company with brains will cheat on this issue, because anyone with a discerning eye knows it at a glance, and I think there may be some misunderstanding or secret that we don't know.
-
I think this may be just hype, and there is not the slightest evidence that JAC is cheating on displacement. I don't think JAC will be so stupid.
-
Now there is no real evidence that JAC is counterfeiting, after all, this brand is also a certain age, and the authenticity of the matter is not easy to judge, so don't follow the trend.
-
If JAC Motors really falsified its displacement, then they are too stupid to make themselves a treasure, but the relevant departments have already issued a penalty letter, and it feels that this incident has involved the interests of many people.
-
I think someone may be doing something about it, because they don't shoot themselves in the foot, and it's still an old brand that appears in the public eye.
-
I don't think JAC would do that. It is impossible to do things that are detrimental to one's own interests. If it is true, the official will definitely present evidence.
-
I don't think there should be fraud, after all, JAC is already a big car brand, there is no need to deceive consumers in this regard.
-
I don't think any speculation is credible until the official testing agency announces the issue, and I'm still waiting for the official to come out and explain.
-
Such a long-established enterprise should not cheat on this thing and ruin their reputation.
-
I don't know if it's true yet, but I don't think this kind of old car company will use this practice to deceive consumers to make profits, and the reputation and reputation are there.