With the promotion of rural revitalization, will the gap between urban and rural areas be reduced? I

will decrease. The best in education and medical care. This will make people's lives better and feel fairer.

Rural population. Reduced to a rural revitalization strategy.

Bringing challenges, rural revitalization can promote local economic development and better improve people's living standards

1. Rural revitalization can better promote local economic development. Rural area because of the geographical location.

Restricted by various conditions, it has not been well developed.

2. Better increase people's income. As rural people, revitalizing the countryside can better improve their income and improve their living standards.

3. Enjoy life better. As people in remote areas, they had to go out to earn a living. If we can revitalize the countryside, we can let them enjoy life better.

4. Improve the education level of local people, improve the moral quality of rural people, and let them have better choices. <>

1. Promoting local economic development is the primary significance of rural revitalization and promoting the development of local economy. The conditions in the countryside are relatively poor in all aspects, compared with the cities. There is no convenient transportation and no more advantages.

With the continuous construction of local governments, the improvement of rural infrastructure in all aspects can promote local economic development. Drive the local people to work together to carry out construction and make the beautiful countryside more prosperous.

Second, substantially raising people's income levels and revitalizing the countryside can give them more choices, and people no longer have to choose agriculture for a living. They can opt for more side hustles that can increase their income. They can also work locally or contract land to increase their income through a variety of channels.

The beneficiaries of rural revitalization are the local people who help them embark on the road to moderate prosperity. <>

3. Enjoy a good lifeFor a long time, people in the countryside can only choose to go out to work to support their families. If they take care of the development of the countryside and revitalize the rural economy, it means that they can find a way to earn a living without leaving their homes. They can also have basic security so that they can enjoy life better.

Rural revitalization can reasonably reduce the number of left-behind children.

and the number of empty nesters, so that more young people can stay in their hometowns and build their hometowns together with everyone. It can not only ensure income at the same time, but also support the elderly, accompany the growth of children, and enjoy a better life in the new era.

Fourth, to improve the education level of rural peoplePreviously, due to economic difficulties, many rural children dropped out of school early or did not get the opportunity to go on to higher education. Rural revitalization, parents' economic conditions have improved, and more attention will be paid to children's education. The level of economic income is constantly rising, and parents can give their children better basic conditions.

Accompany children's growth, better tutor children's learning, and let them have more opportunities for further education. Moreover, as rural conditions improve, people will pay more attention to education and improve the quality of rural personnel.

The first point can drive the whole rural life is very good, the second point can improve the living standard of the people, which is very meaningful, and the third point can let the rural people have more cultural knowledge.

The significance of the rural revitalization strategy is that it is an inevitable requirement to solve the contradiction between the people's growing needs for a better life and unbalanced and inadequate development, an inevitable requirement to realize the "two centenary" goals, and an inevitable requirement to achieve common prosperity for all people.

The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China put the rural revitalization strategy as a national strategy on the important agenda of the party and the first work, and clarified the goals and tasks for the specific rural revitalization actions, and put forward specific work requirements. China used to be a typical agricultural country, Chinese society was a rural society, and the essence of Chinese culture was local culture, so the revitalization of the countryside was particularly important.

Problems faced by rural revitalization:

1. The problem of "people" in the countryside is prominent, and the leaders of "agriculture, agriculture and agriculture" need to be cultivated.

The population of villages is deeply aged, the level of education of the labor force is low, and the gender ratio is generally unbalanced. The situation of rural aging is severe. The proportion of the elderly population over 59 years old in the total population of the whole village in all villages exceeds the social standard line of aging 10%, especially in the Northeast (North China) (the rural area of North China has the deepest degree of aging.

The level of education of the rural labour force is low.

2. The conditions for rural infrastructure construction have improved, but there are still shortcomings, and the level needs to be improved.

There are still a lot of arrears in rural infrastructure construction, and there is still a big gap between the goal of equalizing urban and rural infrastructure and public services. There are still many arrears in rural infrastructure construction, and rural roads are the main shortcoming.

Due to the lack of investment in rural roads, village collectives have become the main suppliers of village infrastructure. The main content of village collective expenditure is infrastructure construction, and the main purpose of raising funds and debts is also the construction of public infrastructure, including rural roads and bridges and water conservancy.

3. The foundation of grassroots self-government is good, and mass cultural and sports activities and civil society service organizations are relatively lacking.

There is a lack of public welfare and mass cultural and sports activities in rural areas. In the surveyed villages, there were only a limited number of public welfare and mass cultural and sports activities organized by the villages. In the past two years, only the villages have held theatrical activities, and the proportion of villages with film or video activities has been held.

There are ball games, and there are collective activities of the whole village during the Spring Festival. Mass cultural and sports activities have the effect of cohesion and unity, and the lack of activities in this area is related to the lack of available funds for the village economy, reflecting the lack of popularity of the village.

Countermeasures: 1. Continuously strengthen investment in public infrastructure such as rural roads and bridges, and reduce the burden on rural collective economic organizations. **Continue to increase public investment in villages where infrastructure such as roads and bridges are lacking, and provide incentives and subsidies for the maintenance of public infrastructure.

For the northeast, northwest, southwest and other regions, it is necessary to give differentiated regional development support policies and continue to tilt support.

2. Adapt measures to local conditions and vigorously develop characteristic industries based on the resource endowment of the village. The development of rural industries is not limited to traditional planting, and under the general requirements of "industrial prosperity" of rural revitalization, rural advantageous resources should be used to develop characteristic industries.

3. Give full play to the power of grassroots self-government, further cultivate diversified supply subjects of various services in rural areas, and enrich the production and life of farmers. On the one hand, we can continue to support the improvement of the system of villagers' congresses, and further improve the system of deliberation work, standardize the openness of village affairs, clarify rights and obligations, enhance the transparency of the work of villagers' committees, and mobilize the enthusiasm of farmers to participate in village governance.

The first point is to be conservative.

Second, there is a lack of overall planning or low transparency, and therefore low participation among the public.

The third point is narrow self-interest.

Fourth, there is a shortage of talents, it is useless to study, and the economy is realistic.

Fifth, the bottleneck of science and technology.

Sixth, market reasons.

Article 3 of the Rural Revitalization Law of the People's Republic of China to promote rural revitalization shall, in accordance with the general requirements of thriving industries, livable villages, civilized rural customs, effective governance, and affluent life, coordinate and promote the construction of rural economic development, political construction, cultural construction, social construction, ecological civilization construction and party building, and give full play to the special functions of rural areas in ensuring the supply of agricultural products and food security, protecting the ecological environment, and inheriting and developing the excellent traditional culture of the Chinese nation.

Urbanization and rural revitalization strategies are not contradictory, and they are integrated and mutually dependent. First, tilting more resources and policies towards rural areas and carrying out rural revitalization is one of the ways to achieve high-quality development in China. According to relevant data, China's urbanization rate has reached 60%, and combined with China's national conditions, China's urbanization rate peaks at 70%.

If at the current stage, the policies and resources are blindly inclined to the development of urbanization, then the resources invested and the economic benefits are not proportional, on the contrary, there are certain shortcomings in China's rural areas, the rural infrastructure is weak, the living conditions are backward, and the danger of the disappearance of traditional culture is particularly obvious compared with the developed countries in the West. If more resources and policies are invested in rural areas, the economic benefits will be much higher than those in urban areas, which is one of the ways to achieve high-quality development in China. Second, urbanization is not about quantity, but about quality.

I believe that the focus of China's current urbanization construction is not how to increase the urbanization rate from 60% to the peak of 70%, but how to improve the 60% urbanization rate with high quality, and at the same time make steady progress while ensuring quality. Some resource elements were originally produced in rural areas, and at the same time can play a greater economic role in rural areas, but subject to the influence of objective factors, and there is no relevant policy support, these resource elements have been flowing to cities and towns in the past, and at the same time, in the process of flow, they have indeed brought a certain boost to the economic development of the city, but in the context of the current rural revitalization strategy, these resource elements that can play a greater role in the countryside should be transferred to the countryside, which is not a retrogression of urbanization construction. It is precisely the quality of the urbanization rate that has been improved, and in the process of flowing these resource elements to the countryside, the vacated space has been made for those resource elements that are more suitable for urban development. Third, open up the flow of resource elements between urban and rural areas, so that urbanization can serve rural revitalization and seek common development.

Break through the fence for the flow of resource elements between urban and rural areas, so that resource elements are suitable for those in rural areas and in cities, and do not artificially set up obstacles. At the same time, we will promote the extension of the infrastructure advantages generated by urbanization in the process of development to the rural areas and serve the rural areas. Finally, it is necessary to take advantage of the trend of resource flow between urban and rural areas to revitalize idle construction land in rural areas and promote two-way high-quality development.

On the one hand, rural revitalization, on the other hand, the implementation of urbanization, how will rural migrant workers choose? This problem has also attracted many people, for the assessment of rural development and urban development trends, today we analyze and study from the perspective of the reality and pattern trend, and hope that you will give more guidance and supplements, and listen to the new farmer brother of Angelica Village! The problems faced by rural areas, in particular, in recent years, the number of rural people in remote mountainous areas has decreased significantly, and the rural left-behind population is seriously aging, so people can't help but ask some questions, on the one hand, rural revitalization, on the other hand, the implementation of urbanization, the two are not contradictory?

The answer is complementary, why? Because of the vigorous promotion of new-type urbanization, many young and middle-aged people in rural areas have also joined the ranks of urbanization, and their living standards have also been markedly improved through their own efforts. All in all, now a large number of rural population to urbanization transfer, which also creates good conditions for scale operation, we think about it, many people have worked, the land remains, less people and more land, the profit margin of scale operation is not larger than before, it is always stronger than the previous want to farm land without land, relying on their own one-acre three-point land alone method has withdrawn from the stage, moderate scale operation is one of the foundations of agricultural modernization, in the current situation, population urbanization transfer is the general trend, It is also the general trend that there are fewer peasants and more sophisticated, and there is no contradiction between the two.

There is no contradiction in this. No matter how much you promote urbanization, you can't get rid of the countryside. It's the same, there are rural ones.

With the dividends brought about by the development of China's urban industrial economy, many young and middle-aged people in rural areas have left their hometowns and gone out to work, which is also an important reason for the decrease in the population of some rural areas, especially rural girls, who have gone out to work for many years, most of them have married to the city, or stayed in the place of work to find a partner, and the people who return to their hometowns are generally young men. In addition to the high bride price, either there is a car, or there is a building in the countryside, and some also require the local county to buy a house, so there are older leftover men in the countryside, from these perspectives, the rural population continues to move to the towns, and the rural population is becoming less and less, what do you think?

On the contrary: even if there is so much outflow of rural personnel, we should not worry, that is, the development of urbanization construction has reached the level of developed countries, due to the huge rural base in China, there are still about 300 million people living in rural areas, therefore, rural revitalization is very important, there is no problem of no one in rural areas, although there are now unmanned villages, or within a controllable range, what do you think?

All in all, now a large number of rural population to urbanization transfer, which also creates good conditions for scale operation, we think about it, many people have worked, the land remains, less people and more land, the profit margin of scale operation is not larger than before, it is always stronger than the previous want to farm land without land, relying on their own one-acre three-point land alone method has withdrawn from the stage, moderate scale operation is one of the foundations of agricultural modernization, in the current situation, population urbanization transfer is the general trend, And the trend of the times is that there are fewer farmers and more fine, what do you think?