Urgent! Questions about the German Army.

Führer - Algandolf Hitler: The exercise of testing the discipline of the military is supported, but the act of marching towards the precipice is the most stupid.

If it's funny, make it a joke!

Is it about the German mountain division.

Another man-made Nazi myth.

Not at this stage.

Countries with aircraft carriers now: United States The United States has a total of 12 aircraft carriers and 11 aircraft carrier battle groups in active service.

They are: CVN 65) USS Enterprise The home port is Norfolk Military Port in Virginia, USA.

CVN 68) The Nimitz is home to Norfolk Military Port in Virginia, USA.

CVN 69) USS Eisenhower is home to Norfolk Military Port in Virginia, USA.

CVN 70) The Carl Vinson is home at Bremerton, Washington, USA.

CVN 71) The home port of the USS Roosevelt is Norfolk Military Port in Virginia, USA.

CVN 72) Lincoln home port of Everett, Washington.

CVN 73) Washington is home port of Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.

CVN 74) The USS Stennis has its home port at the San Diego base in California.

CVN 75) USS Truman is home to Norfolk Military Port in Virginia, USA.

CVN 76) The USS Reagan has its home port in San Diego, California.

CVN 77) USS Bush is home to Norfolk Military Port in Virginia, USA.

United Kingdom. The Invincible-class aircraft carrier (also known as the "Victorious" class) was the first light aircraft carrier in the British Royal Navy to use a skid flight deck.

France. Aircraft carrier Clemenceau USS Charles de Gaulle (nuclear-powered medium aircraft carrier).

Russia. USS Kuznetsov (conventionally powered heavy aircraft carrier).

Italy. USS Garibaldi, USS Count Cavour (aka "Carvour", "Cavour") (all light aircraft carriers).

Spain. Aircraft carrier Prince of Asturias (light aircraft carrier) "Juan Carlos I" (strategic projection ship in the Spanish Navy).

India. The aircraft carrier USS Viratt was originally HMS Athletic of the British Royal Navy. Purchased from the UK in April 1986.

Thailand. Aircraft carrier USS Gakri Nalubet (light aircraft carrier).

Brazil. USS São Paulo (light aircraft carrier).

As a defeated country in World War II, Germany had a tonnage limit for its ships, just like little Japan.

No, but Germany has one of the best conventionally powered submarines in the world.

The defeated countries were not allowed to have large tonnage**, although I liked Germany very much.

No. Germany's favorite ** are submarines and frigates.

Personally, I think that even if Guderian and Rommel finally managed Dunkirk, Germany would still lose the war.

My reasons are as follows: 1. In fact, the most important forces in the anti-fascist European theater were the Soviet Union and the United States, and needless to say on the Eastern Front, it was the United States that played a decisive role in the second battlefield of the Western Front. The 300,000 prisoners (mainly the British army) were later scattered in North Africa, the southern Italian front and Western Europe, of course, not to deny their role in the fight against Germany, at least not to say that it was the successful retreat of these people that led to the defeat of Germany.

2. In fact, Germany's war materials during World War II were good, the country was rich in coal mines, and iron ore was continuously imported by Sweden, but oil was lacking, so Hitler focused on Moscow's oil-producing region after the defeat and retreat, which is now Ukraine. But then again, if he also has a steady stream of ** to supply him, will he be able to win this war? ? Of course you will still lose.

Germany's industrial manufacturing capacity was far inferior to that of the Allies. As far as the navy is concerned, the Bismarck at that time was the most advanced in the world, it can be seen that he is not short of steel or oil, but limited by the limitations of industrial manufacturing capacity, Hitler transferred most of the country's production capacity to the army, followed by the air force, and the remaining production capacity is to build these sea steel, that is, the few ships that are named, so basically these giant steel without too advanced naval combat tactics as a guide The main task is to harass the Allied sea transportation lines, Although Dönitz's naval submarines had caused panic in the Atlantic with wolf packs, once Britain figured out excellent destroyer countermeasures, submarines became hunted targets; Germany's main force is the army, if all the materials can be satisfied, no matter in the early or late stage of the war, all the tanks and heavy vehicles and artillery can be started, but how much can the whole Germany produce, and those best German World War II marine weapons are not all drowned in the Soviet Union's steel torrent and the United States' Sherman. Germany's large arsenals only assemble a Tiger in a few months, and compared with the Soviet Union and the United States, hundreds or thousands of combat vehicles are often used, not because Germany does not have enough steel, but because the production capacity is not enough.

That's the gap. The same goes for the Air Force. 3. Germany's human resources can't keep up, although he is the most populous country in Western Europe, but it pales in comparison with the Soviet Union and the United States, too high ** is unacceptable to this country, in the later war Germany lowered the minimum age of military service every time to strive for more people to supplement the dead soldiers, and the consequence of this is that more and more soldiers have become unqualified recruits, and the ** rate will be higher, this is a vicious circle, plus most of the mechanics are conscripted to the front, The depletion of human resources was another important factor in Germany's defeat in the war.

Impossible, first of all, even if the Germans captured the 300,000 Allied troops in Dunkirk, they would still not be able to win the British air battle, so the sea dominance of the English Channel was no play. If you rely only on the Airborne Forces, it is even more nonsense. Looking at the losses in Crete, it was simply impossible to suppress the British Army without several armored divisions.

Although 300,000 men were not withdrawn from Dunkirk, the native armored corps still had a division, considering that the British tanks were much better than the Germans. (41,42 years) so it was simply impossible to capture the 3 islands of England. Also, How many German troops were there in France 43 years ago?

Hopeless. As for the supplies that supported Germany in the late stages of World War II? If it's raw materials, it's useless, and the factory is completely ruined.

The Soviet Union, because the factories in the Ural Mountains were no problem from the beginning to the end, could produce munitions. If it is munitions, it is estimated that there is not much hope, and the quality of the army is not good. In 44,45 the general quality of the Soviet Guards was significantly stronger than that of the German units.

In terms of numbers, it was much larger than the German army. Germany's defeat was doomed. Even if you take the 3 islands of the United Kingdom, how much will you lose?

And 41 years must have passed. Are you still pointing to the raid on the USSR in '42? Even if you take Britain in 40 years, do you think Stalin will not be prepared for a German surprise attack?

If you attack the Soviet army clearly, the losses of the German army must be amazing, because the equipment of the first Soviet army is better than that of the German army, and the second command ideology The theory of the great depth of the Soviet army is no worse than the blitzkrieg, and the gap between the two armies lies in the quality of soldiers and officers, but the huge number of Soviet troops can make up for this to a large extent, so even if the German army wins, it is a miserable victory, and the Ukrainian military factories will inevitably not fall into the hands of the German army, and the industrial capacity of the Soviet Union will basically not be lost. Judging by the supply mobilization capabilities of the Soviet Union and Germany, the German army was defeated in 43 and 44. Not to mention don't tell me that tens of thousands of people can hold Britain.

Plus the guards of the captive troops. How much could be dealt with the USSR, Comrade Stalin was going to do it against the Germans in 42. Then, the early stage of the war against the Soviet Union was at least impossible to achieve the same results as the Barbarossa plan.

In addition, the joint attack of Japan and Germany against the Soviet Union is nonsense, how many Japanese troops are there in the Far East? During the Kwantung exercise, Japan mobilized 740,000 troops with all its might, and as long as the Soviet army maintained about 400,000 troops in the Far East, there was basically no hope for the Japanese army. What's more, the Soviets have been stationing hundreds of thousands of troops on the Soviet-Turkish border, even in the Battle of Stalingrad.

The reserves in the hands of the Soviet army are far more than the German army, and the Soviet army has not been inferior to the German army in terms of equipment, when the Germans still use No. 3 and No. 4, T34 began to be installed, and when the Germans came out of the leopard type, the whole army was basically popularized. The Soviets will fight much more comfortably than WWII. When he attacked France, he basically turned all the countries in Europe that could fight into his enemies, and added the United States.

Failure is doomed. Of course, it is difficult to say that he will build the atomic bomb before the Americans.