There is a relationship debate between population and manpower 50

The view that truth is often in the hands of a few is in line with dialectical materialism.

The scientific principle. Marx Jinghuai.

Tell us: "There is no smooth road in science, and only those who are brave and the steep mountain road can hope to reach the glorious peak." "Among the many people, those who grasp the truth are those who study hard and have the courage to innovate, those who are scientists and inventors.

And these people are a minority in the population after all. In addition to their own health and intelligence, what is more important is that they are able to explore and discover in practice, which is difficult for ordinary people to do, and it is also difficult for most people to do. In 1600, the famous Italian astronomer Bruno.

Because of his opposition to the geocentric, he supported Copernicus.

The heliocentrism, which asserted that the universe is infinite, was branded as a heretic by the Church, and was burned alive on March 17 of that year in the Piazza del Campo de' Campo in Rome. Later historical practice proved that Bu Xiang's views and propositions were correct, and the truth was in the hands of a few.

It is openly argued that Japan's population density is twice as large as China's, and if the economic policy is correct, then a larger population is more conducive to the country's economic development. To the extent that resources permit, the more people, the greater the economic power. The reason is very simple, a person is always consuming and producing.

Under normal circumstances, a person always produces more than he consumes. For example, the abundant labor force, sufficient military resources, and high consumption levels are conducive to stimulating production and the economy.

For industrial countries, a well-educated population is the most valuable human resource, because wealth is created by people. How much wealth you create depends on the products you create and the services you provide, as well as how popular they are. The more people you have, the more people who demand your products, and the more competitors you have, which leads to technological advancement.

The higher the population density, the less expensive it will be for you to promote your products and services. It can be said that with the increase of population, its economy can only be more developed, and the higher the per capita income.

In a country with a large population, there will inevitably be a large number of banknotes, and an extremely large number of banknotes in the hands of an extremely large number of people will be conducive to the stability of the currency and will have the advantage of becoming a world currency; And the currency issued by a small country is just a little bit and given to speculators for a few speculations, and it may collapse. For example, in countries with large populations, the number of troops as a percentage of the population can be relatively small, and the proportion of defense spending to GDP can be much smaller.

Talking nonsense with your eyes open. Can it work?

According to Keynesian theory, there is an invisible hand that automatically reconciles these relationships, and this is the law of the market.

You can use the method of counter-evidence, the method of overturning the evidence of the positive side, or the tactic of the sea of witnesses, using a large amount of materials to prove your point. Let them overthrow them one by one and consume them to death! You can also use some words that stir up the emotions of the audience and use everyone's voice to give you extra points.

Question:1What is the point of living for oneself means living selfishly without regard for the thoughts and interests of others?

2.Live for yourself, then your parents? Your friend?

Don't you need them? Living for oneself is a mistake in itself!

I really think that your debate is difficult, and your debate is not good for you... Alas, I think I was also a dark horse back then, and I was so devastated by reality...

- -I'll just say what you want.

First of all, if everyone lives only for themselves, then there will be no love, no warmth, no touching things in this world, and the world will become indifferent and selfish.

Second, if you only live for yourself and don't care about the life and death of others, then this kind of life is very unreasonable, everyone takes care of their own affairs, which will lead to the elimination of those who have poor living ability and poor competitiveness, and thus make many people unable to live.

Third, live for others, put yourself in the shoes of the weak, help the weak, and help each other more, then the world will become a better place, and the relationship between people will be more harmonious. There is a good saying, unity is strength, not everything can be done by one person, often there are many things that can be succeeded through the cooperation and efforts of many people, so at this time, if you only take care of yourself, then you will only usher in failure.

Fourth, give people roses, and there is a lingering fragrance in your hands. While you help others, you will also reap happiness, it is easier to be satisfied and happy to give than to get, and when you see the real smile of the person you help you have, you will feel that all your efforts are worth it.

Fifth, people are social animals, and in large social groups, there must be such a situation that the interests of individuals are sacrificed to achieve the interests of the group, and if everyone only cares about themselves at this time, it will cause the situation to get out of control in the big picture. Take family planning as an example, if everyone does not abide by this rule, everyone will have more than one child, then the population explosion will lead to a shortage of food resources, and eventually lead to the extinction of mankind.

It is too selfish to be happy to live for yourself, and the real happiness is the self-affirmation and self-worth realization that you get when you help others, and living for others is the real happiness.

It depends on your arguments.

People have been working all their lives for the benefit of others, and working hard, a large number of examples, recently mentioned Lei Feng, Jiao Yulu, etc., the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, all of them are deputies to the National People's Congress, what is more representative, is to represent the interests of the people, this is the fashion we respect, that is, to live for the people, struggle, etc., with examples to ask, with examples to argue.

For others you can improve your own quality and cultivation, but for yourself is a manifestation of selfishness.

For example, when a teacher achieves an achievement, the teacher's happiness and relief should not be under the parents, except for the student's parents.

That's some of my insights into thinking that others are alive. Thank you!

When a person dies, he can only leave memories, but living for others will be worth living, although the body is dead, the spirit will live forever.

If you live only for yourself, then the world is not only a world of self, where no one communicates with others, and is selfish and self-interested?

For example, helping others is fun, living to be needed, and life is more meaningful.

We live in a collective, everything depends on everyone, and this collective needs to integrate and engage with itself, and we are always dealing with other people, even the little things in life.

Many entertainment stars are equally happy when they give for others.

I have helped others, others are happy, and I am happy myself.

As the old saying goes: it is better to be happy alone than to be happy.

If everyone lived for themselves, life would be very gloomy. Socialism is simply impossible.

Happiness is in life, from relatives, friends, and society.

Be happy to be alive for yourself.

Because we don't know what others think, we don't know whether others are happy or not, we don't know if others are really happy, so only we know ourselves and live happily for ourselves.

The most convincing examples are cited, listing historical celebrities, people who live for others are always remembered by history, such as Qu Yuan, Ouyang Xiu, Marx, etc., people who live for themselves alone, even if they have a greater reputation and a larger career, they will not get a good evaluation, such as Cao Cao, and even more, some selfish people, not only do not have a good reputation, but will be stinking for thousands of years, such as Wang Jingwei and Qin Hui.

The theory of the six-degree relationship holds that no more than six people can have a relationship between any two people on the earth.

The theory of the six-degree relationship was first proposed by the American social psychologist Stanley Milgram in 1967. In layman's terms, you can't have more than six degrees of relationship with anyone in the world, which means that you can get to know any stranger through a maximum of six people.

The theory of the six-degree relationship has a high reputation in the field of social communication, but it is not a rigorously proven theorem, but only an experimental discovery.

It expresses the important concept that any two people who have never known each other, through some means, can always have a certain connection or relationship.

Six degrees of separation theory. In 1967, Stanley Milgram (1933-1984), a professor of psychology at Harvard University, wanted to depict a network of human connections between people and communities. I did a chain letter experiment, and the result was that the phenomenon of "six degrees of separation" was discovered.

Put simply: "You can't have more than six people between you and any stranger, that is, you can get to know any stranger through a maximum of six people." ”

"Six degrees of separation" illustrates the "weak bonds" that are prevalent in society, but they play a very powerful role. There are many people who experience the effect of this weak bond when looking for a job. Through weak bonds, people become very "close" to each other.

Mathematical explanation: If each person knows an average of 260 people, the six degrees are 260 6 1,188,137,600,000. Eliminate some node duplication, which also covers almost the entire earth's population by several times.

It's not so mysterious.

Actually, there are about 100 people in each person's relationship, so theoretically two people can connect 100x100=10,000 people.

That's 100 6 for six people, and the planet is only a few billion people.

What is the relationship between the two? In addition to the teacher-student relationship, there should be another kind of relationship. For example, the relationship between sister and brother, the relationship between uncle and niece, the relationship between father and daughter, in short, the relationship between seniors and juniors.

If it's one of the above relationships, it's normal to give a girl a mobile phone. If it is a simple teacher-student relationship, then it is not suitable. After all, any mobile phone is thousands of dollars, not a small number.

If the teacher gives a mobile phone to every girl who is admitted to high school, then he will have to drink the northwest wind, what is the point of teaching.

It's hard to take your 100.

Against: Environmental pollution is the most direct and conspicuous disadvantage.

If you can't say that, let's take plastic bags! It's not that our technology is too advanced, it's that our technology is not good. If we did, we wouldn't be using plastic bags, but would have invented low-cost and eco-friendly shopping bags.

Because of this, we need to develop environmental protection technology. If there is no science and technology, how can the annual flood be controlled, or we will also learn from Dayu and lead a large group of people to dig canals? Besides, Dayu also said:

People go to higher places, and water flows to lower places. "We should keep up with the times, shouldn't we? Besides, doesn't environmental pollution have anything to do with population expansion?

In fact, environmental pollution is caused by human use and technology, but now all the responsibility is put on science and technology, is it a little shameful? Grandpa once said: "Science and technology are the primary productive forces."

What do you think about this?

Don't talk to him about water conservancy construction, if technology is not beneficial, then what do you want it for? Since the other party said that environmental pollution is related to population expansion, why doesn't the other party stop thinking about it, there was no family planning in ancient times, but now there is, what does this mean? What is limiting the expansion of the population, that is precisely the development of science and technology and society.

Science and technology is the primary productive force, this is not nonsense, even if I can argue with famous quotes, I will not argue, generally say that this is just the role of science and technology, remember that science and technology is to bring benefits and bring greater disadvantages).

I don't have time to think about it later, looking at this situation, you don't have a good argument, you don't have your own system, the questions you ask are not sharp, there are no traps, and it's too simple.

Brother cried.,I played a lot just now.,Submit the revision results and don't find the change behind you qq ask me 35153414.,I really don't want to play anymore.。

Pros and cons of technological development.

Conclusion: The development of science and technology is important, but can not be developed under the premise of reasonable and normal use, development must first purify the mind, only the mind and heart of no individual have been developed and improved, the development of high-tech can be permanently beneficial to the development of human beings, the harmony of nature!

Disadvantages: It is said above that each of us has a higher and farther vision, which makes us see things that are just far away, to explore and pursue, and ignore what should be done in front of us, just like those monarchs in history who want to find immortality, medicine is used to treat diseases, and as a result, they blindly invest in order to achieve something impossible, and as a result, they harm themselves and the people, and there is a macro scene that the people see in the movie now. Chilling imperial burials and those so-called wonders of the world. For example, if every.

The development of science and technology has brought convenience to people, but also brought disaster. Prov: We can go where we want to go, and people are constantly exploring, and in the future we may be able to overturn the Sun Center Society.

In the development and progress of science and technology, no one can enjoy the things that those historical figures can not enjoy, each newcomer has a different understanding of the world, and our vision is farther!