Do you think that whether a person is good at reading is mainly an innate factor or an acquired fact

It must be an acquired factor, because 99% of people are born with the same IQ.

It doesn't have to be outstanding, but at least you have to be action-oriented and good at summarizing and correcting your shortcomings.

I think there are both congenital and acquired factors, people with poor grades in reading may not necessarily be excellent in their future work, on the contrary, many naughty students with bad grades are not interested in reading and like to play, but their brains are still very good.

Acquired environmental factors are very important, the innate will be changed by the acquired, and people with the same intelligence will not be really powerful if they do not have acquired efforts and flexibility.

Of course, it is not absolute, the poor grades will be scored, and the brain will be good if the academic performance will be poor. The key to doing a good job is whether people are diligent, and if they don't work hard like studying, they will not be outstanding.

Poor grades do not mean that the future work will also be bad, many people have poor grades when they are studying, and they will not break out of their own world after work. It can only be said that his talent is not in his studies.

No. A person's poor academic performance is caused by many reasons. Human abilities are unlimited. The most important thing is to give yourself confidence, there is nothing you can't do.

Acquired factors, poor academic performance does not mean that the work is not excellent.

Not necessarily, but learning can improve people's cultivation, but it seems that academic performance and learning are not equal.

Whether a person is good at reading is an acquired factor, and studying is only the past, not the future.

Not necessarily, people have unlimited potential, but you don't realize it, or you haven't been stimulated by others.

Half and half, innate, will have an impact on whether you can read the book or not. The day after tomorrow is just to cultivate what you are interested in. ，

Innate factors, but acquired without hard work is not good.

The day after tomorrow, this is not absolute. As Albert Einstein said, genius is one percent talent plus ninety-nine percent perspiration.

Learning depends on hard work!

Not necessarily. Many of my classmates don't get good grades in school, but they do a good job.

It's a bit of a relationship by nature, but it's mainly based on acquired efforts.

Innate. Poor grades have nothing to do with work.

There is a talent for reading, and there are a lot of poor learners, and there are many people who will become bosses in the future.

The acquired factor is mainly to develop a good reading habit.

Personally, I think that reading well is an innate factor.

No, the work is excellent, and many of them are not very good at school.

No, but many people have a bad impression of people who don't have a good academic performance, so there will be fewer opportunities.

It's a bit of both, but it's more important to work hard.

Of course not, it's the result of hard work.

The key is to look at skills, examination results can only reflect on the one hand, but not reflect the overall quality of people, and examination-oriented education is a failure of China's education system.

On the contrary, those who study poorly and love to play often do well often do well.

No, academics are only one aspect

Innate plus acquired, genius plus hard work.

Innate factors account for 20 percent and acquired effort accounts for 80 percent

I think it's more important to have the day after tomorrow, and the environment in which you live is very important.

The day after tomorrow must be acquired, and the more experience there is, the more injuries there are, the more abundant.

The level of IQ is determined by nature, but people's abilities can be acquired and developed through acquired learning. Some people may have an average IQ, but they are willing to learn, and their abilities, such as learning ability, communication ability, financial management ability, survival ability, life ability, work ability, etc., can be stronger than the average person. On the other hand, some people with high IQs, if they don't go to Pikai to study, their abilities may be average.

However, no matter how hard a person of average intelligence is, no matter how hard he works, he will not be able to have top-notch, extremely good, outstanding abilities.

For example, a person with an average IQ can obtain and develop his ability to take exams through his own hard work in a good external environment, and be admitted to a college, but no matter how hard he works, he will not be admitted to the world's top universities, including Tsinghua University and Peking University. Therefore, IQ is equivalent to an innate mine, and how much ore this mine produces still needs to be excavated the day after tomorrow.

But if this mine contains less ore, it will produce so much ore with all the effort of excavation.

Innate factors determine the upper limit of your IQ, and acquired cultivation determines the lower limit of your IQ.

Pure IQ or innate factors play a decisive role.

It should be said that there are all of them, the foundation has been laid by innate factors, and the acquired cultivation is slowly changing.

This is an interesting question, let me give you an analogy.

If you were born in a very good family background, you have no worries about food and clothing, and if you don't work hard and don't seek improvement, you will end up with nothing.

If you were born into a very poor family background and were poor, if you worked hard and were aggressive, you would end up with everything.

Now you get the idea.

There is a certain relationship between the congenital and the acquired conditioning.

Hello, to what you say about a person's personality is definitely an acquired factor that affects more.

For example, many of the twin brothers or sisters in the show have grown up separately since they were young for various reasons, and they grew up in different environments, different family atmospheres, different educational styles, different social groups and friends, and in this case, the personalities of the two people are completely different. Therefore, from this point of view, it is acquired factors that will have a greater impact on the shaping of personality.

The person in charge told you that whether it is intelligence, height or system, etc., congenital accounts for 70%. Innate is equivalent to the foundation of a person's life, and if the foundation is not strong, it will be easy to loosen the day after tomorrow.

Do you really think that the acquired hard work type can catch up with the natural one? If you compare yourself with those top students in the college entrance examination, you will never be able to get his score in your life. If the day after tomorrow is more important, people who play basketball every day are taller than people who don't play basketball and don't exercise.

As for the system, I am afraid that it is difficult to see it now. In the past, the ancients relied on themselves. After a plague, the genetics of the body can be carried over, and the bad ones will die.

The Red Army's Long March, those who survived were some extremely strong people. It's the same when people are sick, taking medicine when they are sick, medicine is just an auxiliary, and the key is to look at their own antibodies. You can try it, it's good to take medicine when you're sick, and it's good to take medicine if you don't take medicine.

But don't take medicine as soon as you get sick, otherwise your body will become resistant to it.

We also practice martial arts, under the acquired efforts, the strength and technology are about the same, congenital bad is not able to hold the other party, because your bones are not as thick as the other party, this is a genetic problem, that is, congenital.

I can tell you responsibly that the day after tomorrow is very important.

In fact, the IQ difference between most people is really not very big, the reason why we think that some people are smart and some people are stupid is because everyone has his strengths and weaknesses, some people are good at math but the article may be badly written, some people have a strong sense of musicality but their writing skills may be very bad, and so on... Too much. Our judgment of whether someone is smart or stupid is often just to see one side of him.

Everyone's acquired ability development is crucial, and the key is to find out what your strengths are.

The innate determines the upper limit of your development, that is, the height of the ceiling. Acquired effort will determine how much of this ceiling you can reach.

In the top field, whether it is a scientist or an athlete, because everyone works very hard, at this time, the main thing to look at is the innate who has better talent and whose achievement is higher.

But for the vast majority of ordinary people, the main thing is to fight for the day after tomorrow, because everyone's innate is almost the same, so the acquired effort has become the decisive factor.

Innate is important. Imagine if a person was born a fool, or was born with congenital deficiencies and constant diseases, how about it? Therefore, the state should promote eugenics. This is primary.

Acquired is also important. A person is born with normal things, but it is in vain not to learn, not to forge ahead, and not to hone himself.

To distinguish this, we must first understand the difference between innate and acquired, the biggest difference between the two is that innate cannot be changed, and acquired can be changed through human efforts and mind.

So relatively speaking, it is more important to acquire.

There are often many children who are born with intellectual weakness, and they have become celebrities with acquired efforts, and have made achievements in some fields that ordinary people cannot do.

Of course, acquired is important, as long as there are no congenital brain defects, acquired is definitely important.

Innate is the foundation, and the acquired is construction.

Most people are congenitally similar, and the key to the big difference is that it is caused by acquired things. So in a way, acquired is more important than innate.

Although the innate conditions need to be taken seriously, the acquired effort is more important. If a person is proud of his talent and intelligence, and he doesn't learn it, is that possible? There was a story about a boy and a girl who could not use their ears and eyes due to illness, and they were very depressed and sad about their fate, but an old man said to them, although you have become what you are now, it is not that there is no way out.

Blind children learn to learn **, can't see things but make him avoid interference, deaf children learn art, because of deafness, also avoid interference, it can be seen that the acquired effort is more important!

Innate is your potential, and acquired requires you to work your own.

Potential cannot be changed, and the acquired can be created by yourself.

For your problem, it should be the acquired matter.

Innate is our inner energy, but sometimes it is between the environment and various conditions that cannot be exerted to the limit, so the acquired factor is very important, of course, the innate conditions are also necessary.

If it is innately important, people still struggle to be big.

The I Ching is not mysterious, it is all around us.

Of course, it is the day after tomorrow that matters, can you choose who to be the parent?

A person's height is determined by congenital genetics and acquired factors, and it is not congenitally limited. Congenital genetic factors depend on the genes of the parents, which we have no way to change, and the acquired factor is that the body's nutrition should be supplemented in time and sufficient. Some people will be limited in height due to genetic factors, while some people's height can be changed by acquired factors.

A person's height has a little to do with congenital conditions. But acquired nutrition and exercise also have a lot to do with it. There are many children whose parents are not very tall, but the children are rich in nutrients, and they will grow tall after regular exercise.

Therefore, nutrition for children when they are young is very important. Drinking more milk will help you grow.

Height is a congenital factor, but also an acquired factor is crucial, if the acquired exercise, and then eat some nutrients to grow the body slowly can have a taller class ability, but genetics is also very related, girls with their mothers, boys with their fathers!

Imperfection. Innate is only a part. The acquired factor is also very important.

If you can insist on exercising properly every day, pay attention to the health and collocation of your diet, and try not to stay up late at night, you will still have the opportunity and room to grow taller to a certain extent. Don't be discouraged.

There is this possibility, a person's height, how much is also related to genetic factors, basically birth has already determined your height, no matter how much you refine the day after tomorrow, there will not be too many changes, however, there are exceptions, parents are short, and children are very tall.

A person's height is determined by innate genetics and acquired nutritional supplements and exercise, which means that you can work hard to grow taller by yourself. The most fundamental thing is genes, but if you keep up with the acquired nutrition and exercise hard, your height will improve a lot.

A person's height is determined by the height of his parents, so a person's height is limited to you first, but the probability of being limited is not large, and you can also grow ten centimeters taller on the original basis after long-term exercise in the later stage, which is also possible.

Height has a lot to do with the genes of the parents, if the parents and grandparents are short, it is difficult to improve the height of the child under the influence of the family. Of course, acquired factors are also very important, children can't keep up with the acquired diet, and poor sleep quality is also the reason for affecting height.

I think so, right. For example, if your parents are 1.6 meters, even if you can get the acquired improvement, your height will not exceed 1.7 meters.

Is a person's height congenitally limited? The height of a one-to-one individual is not necessarily congenitally limited, but also born by genetic factors, which are limited, most of them are acquired, and a series of factors such as nutritional exercise are limited.

How, genetics is very important, but as long as you have a reasonable diet, healthy diet, and insist on exercising, you can also have a satisfactory height and work hard.

Congenital genetic factors play a decisive role, but they can be improved and changed through acquired nutritional supplementation and exercise, so it is possible to grow taller with acquired efforts.

Not necessarily, although innate genes are an important factor in determining height, they are also essential and can be improved by playing with milk and basketball.