During World War II, Germany was able to fight several large countries, why does it not dare to do e

Updated on military 2024-05-10
22 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Because after World War II, Germany was limited by the victorious powers, and it was also limited in the size of its army and so on.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    First of all, because now small countries will find a strong backer for themselves, such as the Netherlands next to Germany, with the United States as a backer, according to former Dutch Prime Minister Lubbers said that the United States has also stored its own nuclear ** in the Netherlands, therefore, if Germany wants to move the Netherlands, it must take into account the United States, so Germany does not dare to do it easily. Secondly, the current German Kenben cannot be compared with the Germany of World War II, and it is okay to talk about self-defense, but if you want to start a war again, you are destroying yourself

    After World War II, Germany's military strength was greatly weakenedDuring World War II, Germany's army could reach 12 million, but now Germany's maximum is about 200,000. And so far, Germany has not developed a very destructive **, such as aircraft carriers in the hands of Britain and France, which play a decisive role in modern warfare. Therefore, Germany is not sure that it will be able to win against the surrounding small countries at all, so how can it talk about doing it?

    Germany is a relatively powerful country, and the army it has and needless to say, it must be very powerful, but now the war is not said to be imminent, even if there are contradictions between the two countries, it will not start a war until it is necessary to fight. Just like the two countries, the United States and Iraq, the contradictions were fierce but there was no war. What is now dominated by world peace, and many countries have allies.

    It is equivalent to starting a war, which is not a matter between two countries, it can be said that it is about the whole world, after previous wars, we all know how harmful war is, and we will not take the initiative to fight other countries when it is not necessary. Whether it is Germany or the United States, even if they win the war against a small country, their own losses will be very heavy.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    This is because their development is slow and they have no strength, so they don't dare to be so arrogant.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Because they provoked two world wars, and if they provoked wars, they would definitely be blamed by the whole world.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Because after World War II, Germany was almost partitioned, and the repression of other countries led to the slow development of Germany.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The order of German aggression in World War II is as follows:

    Start with Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Austria, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Great Britain (air combat), Greece, Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union.

    At the beginning of World War II, AHitler advocated a preemptive strike, concentrating his army and air forces, striking the enemy like a sudden lightning bolt in the dark of night, attacking fiercely and seemingly invincible. From September 1939 to June 1940, he used blitzkrieg to occupy Poland, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, France and other countries.

    Specifically, it conquered Poland in 27 days, Denmark in 1 day, Norway in 23 days, the Netherlands in 5 days, Belgium in 18 days, and France in 39 days.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    1. Geographically, Germany is too far away from China. So it's very unsuitable. Moreover, it is simply impossible for the German side to enter the Tanggula Pass or bypass the Soviet side and come from Mongolia.

    2. Since the beginning of World War II, China and Germany have not been in a state of hostility, but they have only involved a V island country in the middle. But even so, the two sides are still working together. Especially military cooperation.

    The Chinese side produces ore, tungsten ore for armor-piercing shells and armor-piercing guns, and the German side sends instructors and light ** (heavy ** are not allowed to sell. As early as the late Qing Dynasty, Sino-German relations were always very good. When Bismarck was depressed in his later years, Li Hongzhang also visited him in person.

    For the iron-blooded prime minister, I believe that Mr. Xi, who is also known for his iron blood, should appreciate it more. At the same time, when he was a young painter, he received help from the Heavenly Couple in Vienna. He also recorded this in some of his own books.

    Therefore, although there has always been a territorial dispute in Sino-German relations (Qingdao), there has never been a big fight with each other. Instead, they are learning from each other.

    3. The most incredible thing is that after the war, a lot of information was declassified, and there were many scientists in the Kingdom of Heaven, even during the war against Japan, who studied in Germany, and they still learned some military science and technology. Such as artillery ballistics, Krupp arsenal technicians, etc. (Reader's Digest broke the news).

    And that expert in artillery ballistics was later the wife of a scientist surnamed Qian in my country. It can be seen from this that the relationship between China and Germany is indeed not ordinary. As for Japan, if there is no Russian presence in this regard, the German side will actually be more entangled.

    Export** and military training to the invaded country to fight their allies. It's awkward to say that it's awkward to change anyone.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    First of all, we must know that World War II was provoked by Germany, Italy and Japan, and Germany, Italy, and Japan all had their own calculations; They are limited according to their own capabilities and geographical location, strategic points, etc., and their aim is to force the other side to obey them by force, so as to achieve their desired ends.

    Their goal was that Germany wanted to defeat Europe, Italy wanted to defeat Africa, and Japan wanted to conquer Asia.

    For example, Germany has to pass through Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Poland, and Russia to come to China, and these countries have limited Germany to the point that Germany is not capable of attacking China at that time, and even if Germany really wants to fight China, they will not be able to do so. Because at that time, German fighter planes could only fly 400 to 700 kilometers before landing and refueling, and it was impossible for the army to come to China with huge supplies, which was a very simple explanation, which showed that Germany's rear supply capacity was insufficient, and it was impossible to go over the mountains and mountains to fight China, and besides, Hitler hated Europe, especially the Soviet Union, so Hitler did not fight China, and he had no ability at all, and China had been occupied by Japan since then, and Germany had no need to compete with its own accomplices for profit.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    First of all, from a strategic point of view, it would be unwise to seek the near and far, and secondly, if you attack China, a front that stretches for thousands of miles, with the strength and supplies of Germany at that time, it is undoubtedly like reaching the sky.

    In addition, it is unknown how the Soviet Union will react to attacking China with Japan, and what will happen to Britain on the west coast, these are all unknowns, and these factors all determine that it is impossible for Germany to attack China with its national strength at that time, and why it will fight the Soviet Union if it does not attack China, or strategically speaking, the Soviet Union has a vast land and resources, and has many more resources than any other country in Europe. If the Soviet Union is taken, basically Europe will be about the same, and the remnants of the Anglo-French coalition will not be able to achieve much climate, and after sweeping the whole of Europe, and then confronting the United States in the end, the chances of winning are still very large, and this is Hitler's general strategic line.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Because there was a Soviet Union in the middle, if he wanted to fight, he had to take the Soviet Union down first.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    If you are a neighbor of Germany, try it.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Nobody wants to him ... The Germans are also very clear that the early stage is to regain lost ground and beat him up. Poland is one of them.

    The annexation of Austria led to national unity, and Turkey remained neutral...Switzerland didn't fight, and the people who had the power to suppress the German army at that time were Britain and France, and the Soviets in the Far East, and Germany was very cunning in taking advantage of the contradictions between Britain and France and the Soviets... The Soviets wanted the Germans to go west, and the Germans went to beat the French, and the British, and if the British didn't fight, they immediately turned around and fought the Soviets, which seemed to me almost a clever move...

    The Soviets were not ready at all ... Or it was naïve to think that Germany would not turn east if it had not solved the problem of the Western Front, but unfortunately this was not according to common sense, and the German army fought like this... As for some netizens saying that the German army's strategy is wrong, in fact, in my opinion, this is also a clever plan: If it doesn't snow on the Eastern Front, the German army occupies the territory of Europe, and the Soviet factories in the forest areas of the Far East will not be able to meet the front line.

    To sum up, a heavy snowfall devastated the German ** Army Group Thinking about it the other way around... If the Eastern Front goes well... The Germans turned around and hit England again, and England was also caught off guard, which should be called a sound attack on the west.

    But if you lose, you lose... The strategic mistake was that Dunkirk laid the groundwork to completely annihilate the allied forces in Dunkirk, and it didn't matter if Britain fought or not, turned around and went east, and then turned back to clean up the western front, and basically controlled the European territory... The Soviets retreated to the Far East, and they simply could not afford to consume without industry, and the mechanized battlefields of Europe were neither.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    In the early stage, Germany mainly picked up those who had a deep hatred with him, and relied on the blitzkrieg to take the lead. The appeasement of Britain and France was mainly due to the small wealth and the accumulation of peace, and not long after the war of the First World War ended, a war shook the hegemony of the old Western Europe, and if it happened again, I am afraid that it would be reduced from first-class to second-rate, or even third-rate. The United States had already begun to seek hegemony in World War I, but it did not succeed.

    And the fight is still fought in your own home, and the loss is afraid that it will not come.

    After World War I, many countries did not want to fight, and the war was too consuming of national strength, but Germany, as a defeated country, was always oppressed and exploited, and held back its anger. Moreover, oppression and exploitation are not the turn of European countries, it must be carved up by big countries, and small countries still can't drink a sip of oil.

    You only saw that in the early stage of the war, although Germany won the jackpot, it really couldn't afford to spend it, and it was too unlucky to be in Italy, which couldn't help anything. In many European countries, the land area is small, the population is small, and the production capacity is not high.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    This is actually linked to the strength of the German army. Since Hitler came to power, the collapsed German economy has recovered rapidly. Hitler was an ambitious man, he armed Germany, he made speeches to mobilize the Germans, his speeches and his abilities fanned the Germanic peoples, and he promised to help Germany avenge the First World War and make Germany stronger.

    To answer the landlord's question, at that time, only Britain and France were able to fight with Germany in Europe, and other countries were not strong enough, because Germany was much higher than the Netherlands and Norway in terms of people's knowledge, education and technology, and the population of 60 million was also incomparable with these countries. Moreover, at that time, the graduation rate of German universities was even higher than that of today's China, and many talents emerged, and Germany had a good industrial base in the past. The restoration, of course, is not comparable to that of these countries, and he can process steel and so on for heavy industry.

    The soldiers are well-trained, resolute in fighting, and new in their tactics. Here's why. The main thing is the excellent unity of the nation....I'll just say that later East and West Germany merged...People are mostly thinking about the nation.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    One point is that Germany did not send troops to attack European countries at the same time, there is a sequence, and there is also the fact that Germany did not support World War II, and there were many countries in the Axis countries, and not all of them were completed by the German army, such as fighting the Soviet Union, and Italy also sent troops. The North African battlefield was originally initiated by Italy, but Italy did not seek benefits in North Africa, and Germany had to send troops to North Africa as a last resort. In addition, Germany's tactics and military equipment at that time were somewhat superior to those of other European countries.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Because Hitler was a madman, and only a madman would fight on multiple fronts, this is what Stalin said in the defense of Moscow.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Not many people?? Both Germany and Japan were all soldiers, and there were more troops than the Soviet Union was in service at that time. The same is true of Japan, which had no fewer soldiers than China in those years. Moreover, coupled with industrial strength, that is, there was a certain imbalance between the great powers and their military and industrial industries.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    You must know that the German nation is a warlike nation, and at that time Germany had advanced **, excellent military talents, crazy recruitment, coupled with advanced blitzkrieg theory, it is not strong or good.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Well equipped, there are famous generals like Rommel, Guderian, Goering, etc. There are also advanced combat theories and advanced weapons, such as V2 missiles, Stuka dive bombers, etc. After Hitler came to power in 1931, the German economy recovered, while Britain and France and other countries declined in economic strength due to the economic crisis.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Germany has compulsory military service, and there are allies, Italy, Hungary... He is annexing Austria, doesn't the Czech Republic have the largest arsenal, so Germany first west and then east, have you ever heard of the defeat of the army, Germany's successive victories have scared those small countries to death, they do not have any territorial depth, Britain and France adopted a compromise policy because they wanted to use Germany to eliminate the communist Soviet Union, and as a result, Germany was given a chance.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Other countries are even smaller.

    With a population of 80 million, Germany is more than Britain and France, and only less than the Soviet Union.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    The strength of a country cannot be simply divided by population and land area. Think about the end of the Ming Dynasty, when there were hundreds of millions of people in China, only to be conquered by the Manchus, who numbered less than a million.

    The number of people was not equal to the number of troops, and the combat effectiveness of the improvised peasant contingent was far inferior to that of the regular army. If the regular army is defeated. No matter how many people there are, it will be in vain.

    There are not many soldiers, but fine. It will not be brave but strategic. The spirit of the Germanic peoples made them the first in the world in terms of wisdom and organization. In addition, modern warfare is different from ancient times, and the quality and sophistication of the first are the key to a military victory.

    Germany has all these things. How could it be impossible to lose.

    The brave and absolute obedience of the Germans made it very easy for them to deal with enemies who could only run.

Related questions
8 answers2024-05-10

I'll help you out.

In the 30s of the last century, Jews were mostly inhabited, such as in Warsaw, Berlin, and Kiev, and there were many settlements, and it was easy to find or isolate. In Warsaw, for example, there is the Jewish Quarter, which resembles Chinatown, but is much larger than that. In Germany, Jews have different identity cards than others, so it's easy to determine whether a person is Jewish. >>>More

11 answers2024-05-10

Depth: 150-350 meters.

Drainage: about 1000 tons. >>>More

16 answers2024-05-10

Arado was disbanded. Messerschmidt (formerly Bavarian Aircraft Factory, not Bavarian Maschinenbau (BMW)), Folkwulf, Heinkel, Dornier, Junkers were all merged and now known as the European Aerospace Defence and Space Corporation (EADS), later renamed Airbus Group. During this period there was MBB (Messerschmidt-Bolkow (I don't know how to translate this...).- Blom), MBB was acquired by the German aerospace company DASA, and later renamed Daimler-Benz Aerospace, the predecessor of EADS Germany. >>>More

15 answers2024-05-10

During World War II, Germany missed at least three turnarounds. <>The most important turning point in the Battle of Britain was that the Luftwaffe underestimated the role of British radar, believing that radar was not important, and switched to bombing cities. If the Luftwaffe chose to continue to attack the British radar station at that time, and then paralyzed the radar in the English Channel area and lost the monitoring ability, this would at least drag the British Air Force and make the Air Force unable to effectively control the sea surface from the air, so that the German Sea Lion Plan could be implemented and send the German Army to the British Isles, plus the psychological impact of the blitzkrieg at that time still existed, and with the high-quality German Army at that time, in the face of the British who were limited to panic at that time, the German army should be able to take the British Isles quickly. >>>More

8 answers2024-05-10

Germany didn't know that at that time. Japan had already planned to attack the United States, and Germany knew about it, but all along, Germany had been vigorously opposed to Japan's attack on the United States, because the United States' participation in the war at that time was likely to directly reverse the situation of the war that was originally biased in their favor, and moreover, Japan at that time did not conquer China within a month as it had planned, and the war situation in East Asia was still unclear, and if the United States got involved, it would inevitably suffer from the enemy, so Germany has always opposed Japan's sneak attack on the United States in this regard. However, the Japanese emperor at that time seemed to have seen the defeat of the war and lost confidence in the war, so with their national character, they had to fight to the death. >>>More